"Weddington, Eric" <eric.wedding...@atmel.com> wrote: > Gah, that last sentence should read: So, *those* files would have to > be submitted to avr-libc *by Atmel*.
If they've already got a BSD-style copyright when they are shipping as part of the Atmel toolchain (I didn't look whether they do), this copyright statement itself would be enough to be integrated into the public avr-libc repository, because the redistribution clauses in a BSD-style copyright already do allow it. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
