> -----Original Message----- > From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org > [mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org] On > Behalf Of Weddington, Eric > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:43 AM > To: Georg-Johann Lay > Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Praveen, Vidya; Wunsch, Joerg; Joerg Wunsch > Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches > > > > > Weddington, Eric schrieb: > > >> Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch > > >> > > >>> The FSF only allows changes of 10 lines or less in a patch, if > > >>> there is no copyright assignment on file. > > >> I thought with the recent changes, adding a new AVR device is > > >> merely going to be a one-liner (a change to avr-devices.c)? > > > > > > Sure, it's now easier to add devices. But device support also needs > > > the I/O header file in avr-libc, and no one else can submit that > > > except Atmel. > > > > Ah, interesting. Does this mean avr-libc is owned / hosted by Atmel now? > > No, it never has been owned by Atmel. > > But, sorry let me make myself a little clearer: > > Atmel has generated I/O header files to match the new devices. Those header > files are copyright by Atmel. So, *those* files would have to be submitted > to avr-libc.
Gah, that last sentence should read: So, *those* files would have to be submitted to avr-libc *by Atmel*. (Caffeine is not having much effect this morning...) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
