Re: What happened to test folder instspc.dir ? -- Please ignore, I have worked it out.

folder  instspc.dir? I've still got a copy from version 1.15, so I suffer no loss. If you have a document which refers to its removal, or a git commit message , I would appreciate it. kind regards, Kevin Youren

RE: How can I pass $@ to Makefile?

You are indeed wise. Thank you Eric Blake!

Re: How can I pass $@ to Makefile?

sh' > test3.abc > + echo '#!/bin/bash' > echo "echo test3.abc $# ' [' $@ ']'>> test3.log" >> test3.abc This is what make passed to the shell... > + echo 'echo test3.abc 0 '\''

RE: How can I pass $@ to Makefile?

o '#!/bin/bash' echo "echo test3.abc $# ' [' $@ ']'>> test3.log" >> test3.abc + echo 'echo test3.abc 0 '\'' ['\'' '\'']'\''>> test3.log' echo "echo I am a test script&

Re: How can I pass $@ to Makefile?

On 2015-05-28 10:23 -0700, Arthur Schwarz wrote: > I'm have a little program in my makefile.am: > > test3.abc: > echo '#!/bin/bash' > test3.abc > echo "echo test3.abc $$# ' [' $$@ ']'>&g

How can I pass $@ to Makefile?

I’m have a little program in my makefile.am: test3.abc: echo '#!/bin/bash' > test3.abc echo "echo test3.abc $$# ' [' $$@ ']'>> test3.log" >> test3.abc echo "echo I am a test scrip

Can I make a convenience library from non-convenience libraries

for this library ... just the previous libraries. All of the examples I see in the automake documentation for making convenience libraries shows pretty much the same thing: e.g. noinst_LTLIBRARIES = convenience.la convenience_la_SOURCES = ... What I'm wondering about doing is something

Re: automake breaks my file by putting includes after rules; how do I fix this?

file by putting includes after rules; how do I fix this? (Jason Gross) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:49:49 -0500 From: Jason Gross To: Gavin Smith Cc: Automake Mailing List Subject: Re: automake breaks my file

Re: automake breaks my file by putting includes after rules; how do I fix this?

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Jason Gross wrote: > These compiled files get distributed/installed, so I think they belong in > DATA. > > The solution I ended up using was manually including an "all-am" target > below the definition, which overrides the one that automa

Re: automake breaks my file by putting includes after rules; how do I fix this?

These compiled files get distributed/installed, so I think they belong in DATA. The solution I ended up using was manually including an "all-am" target below the definition, which overrides the one that automake generates. I think the other contributors to the project would com

Re: automake breaks my file by putting includes after rules; how do I fix this?

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Jason Gross wrote: > I have a Makefile.am which includes another file in order to get a list of > files it should compile (I don't want to require running autoreconf and > configure whenever you add a file that the makefile already knows how to &g

Re: automake breaks my file by putting includes after rules; how do I fix this?

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Jason Gross wrote: > (I don't want to require running autoreconf and > configure whenever you add a file that the makefile already knows how to > compile). > You actually do not need autoreconf. Maintainer mode will take care of it for you

automake breaks my file by putting includes after rules; how do I fix this?

I have a Makefile.am which includes another file in order to get a list of files it should compile (I don't want to require running autoreconf and configure whenever you add a file that the makefile already knows how to compile). But this does not work with automake's generated all

bug#13760: [PATCH 0/2] am__make_dryrun fails to handle GNU make -I option

Stefano Lattarini writes: > And of course, if you want to attempt a fix yourself in the meantime, > be my guest ;-) I was thinking of coming up with a fix. My problem is I can only do it for GNU make; I don't know anything (and, to be honest, don't care) about other flavors o

How do I make a .dylib library with non standard name

I’m working on a project where I would like to use Automake to build a library for mac osx that will be dlopened by existing programs expecting a non-standard name. I’ve been able to get a library generated with the .dylib extension using a name in a standard format When I change the name to a

bug#10889: Some output of a recent build of automake-1.10 - it requested I send it to you!

Some output of a recent build of automake-1.10 - it requested I send it to you! Build is on OpenIndiana 151a2 (illumos/née OpenSolaris) Regards, Lou Picciano make[3]: `aclocal-1.10' is up to date. make[3]: `automake-1.10' is up to date. make[3]: Leaving directory `/export/home/drl

How do I make data depend on something?

phprg.doc > > swisseph_html_SOURCES = swisseph.doc > > swephprg_pdf_SOURCES = swephprg.doc > > swisseph_pdf_SOURCES = swisseph.doc I define rules to create pdf from doc files and define dependancies with the _SOURCES lines. But this gives the following errors: > doc/Makefile.am:25: v

Re: Where can I get 1.10a?

Hello Bernd, * Bernd Jendrissek wrote on Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:59:43PM CET: > I have been trying to update to more recent autotools, and being a > traceability nazi, I want to rebuild from as far upstream as possible. > That means ignoring the distributed ./configure and Makefi

Where can I get 1.10a?

I have been trying to update to more recent autotools, and being a traceability nazi, I want to rebuild from as far upstream as possible. That means ignoring the distributed ./configure and Makefile.in and rebuilding them with currently installed autotools. Here's my problem: Recent aut

Re: I need a hint to integrate a php-extension build into an existing automake

Andreas Otto writes: > I want to add a "php" extension into an allready existing project creating > various extensions to other languages as well Yeah, this is always weird. I keep meaning to write up what I'm currently doing in my projects for review. > 1. wh

I need a hint to integrate a php-extension build into an existing automake

Hi, I want to add a "php" extension into an allready existing project creating various extensions to other languages as well I use automake/autoconf for build top-level project. My new "php" extension has the name "phpmsgque" build in the subdirectory of

Re: -I. in DEFAULT_INCLUDES

On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 19:46 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Bob Ham wrote on Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 01:24:06PM CEST: > > DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -...@am__isrc@ -I$(top_builddir) > > > > > > Why does this -I. exist? How can I remove it? > > See > info Autom

Re: -I. in DEFAULT_INCLUDES

On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 09:34 -0600, John Calcote wrote: > Just curious - under what conditions do you have a header file in the > local directory that you need to have overridden by a globally installed > header file? I have a file named string.h in a subdirectory. It's part of

Re: -I. in DEFAULT_INCLUDES

Hello Bob, * Bob Ham wrote on Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 01:24:06PM CEST: > I have a problem due to conflicts between local and system header > filenames. This problem comes about because of the addition of -I. to > the CXXFLAGS of any objects. I've traced this to a variable called >

Re: -I. in DEFAULT_INCLUDES

Bob Ham wrote: > Hi there, > > I have a problem due to conflicts between local and system header > filenames. This problem comes about because of the addition of -I. to > the CXXFLAGS of any objects. I've traced this to a variable called > DEFAULT_INCLUD

Re: -I. in DEFAULT_INCLUDES

Hi Bob, On 7/6/2009 5:24 AM, Bob Ham wrote: Hi there, I have a problem due to conflicts between local and system header filenames. This problem comes about because of the addition of -I. to the CXXFLAGS of any objects. I've traced this to a variable called DEFAULT_INCLUDES in

-I. in DEFAULT_INCLUDES

Hi there, I have a problem due to conflicts between local and system header filenames. This problem comes about because of the addition of -I. to the CXXFLAGS of any objects. I've traced this to a variable called DEFAULT_INCLUDES in every Makefile.in: DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -...@am__isr

Re: How do I avoid this infinite loop?

to BSDs and several other systems on the way? Erm, if those TAO libs are not yours, then you should go and suggest this to their author, I guess. They do not use libtool to build these libraries. They are using a build system called MPC (Makefile Project Creator) and there is no way I could co

Re: How do I avoid this infinite loop?

>> linux, >> and gain portability to BSDs and several other systems on the way? >> >> Erm, if those TAO libs are not yours, then you should go and suggest >> this to their author, I guess. > > They do not use libtool to build these libraries. They are using

Re: How do I avoid this infinite loop?

Hi Ralf, On 04/11/2008, at 22.39, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Jules Colding wrote on Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 08:46:54AM CET: I have a little project in where I use a third party project. My "Makefile.am" has a rule to update and build the third party project but this rule enters an unc

Re: How do I avoid this infinite loop?

Hello Jules, * Jules Colding wrote on Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 08:46:54AM CET: > > I have a little project in where I use a third party project. My > "Makefile.am" has a rule to update and build the third party project but > this rule enters an unconditional infinite loop.

How do I avoid this infinite loop?

Hi, I have a little project in where I use a third party project. My "Makefile.am" has a rule to update and build the third party project but this rule enters an unconditional infinite loop. Right now I'm getting the source for the external project from svn. I would like m

Re: passing autoreconf -I to aclocal -I

is patch makes sense to apply, or better reasoning than I > can offer why it is not correct. fair enough. cheers, -- Clinton Roy CSIRO - Robotics Platform Engineer Autonomous Systems Lab humbug.org.au - Brisbane Unix Group azure.humbug.org.au/~croy/blog - Blog flickr.com/photos/croy/ - Photo

Re: passing autoreconf -I to aclocal -I

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [adding automake list] According to Clinton Roy on 10/22/2008 5:45 PM: Hello, Clinton, > This patch makes autoreconf pass along -I arguments to aclocal, which > is useful in cases > where m4 files are installed in sensible, but non standa

Re: Why I can not overwrite CXXFLAGS values?

Set AM_ and xxx_ both? Manual said, only one of them will be used. Yes, that is right. For the sources of xxx, xxx_CXXFLAGS will be used. For all sources in this Makefile.am which do not have per-target flags, AM_CXXFLAGS will be used. I figured you might have other sources in

Re: Why I can not overwrite CXXFLAGS values?

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Steven, > > * Steven Woody wrote on Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 08:54:59PM CEST: >> In my system, the default CXXFLAGS is '-g -O2'. But, for a particular >> program, I need -O0 an

Re: Why I can not overwrite CXXFLAGS values?

Hello Steven, * Steven Woody wrote on Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 08:54:59PM CEST: > In my system, the default CXXFLAGS is '-g -O2'. But, for a particular > program, I need -O0 and without -g. I tried something like: > bin_PROGRAS = xxx > xxx_CXXFLAGS = -O0 > in Mak

Re: How can I change shared library's version number?

"Steven Woody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When I use autoconf/automake with its integrated libtool to build a > shared library, I got shared libraray named 'libfoo.so.0.0.0'. I > don't sure where the 0.0.0 comes from, and I don't like it. How

How can I change shared library's version number?

When I use autoconf/automake with its integrated libtool to build a shared library, I got shared libraray named 'libfoo.so.0.0.0'. I don't sure where the 0.0.0 comes from, and I don't like it. How can I change it? I searched info page but found no answer. Thanks in advance. - narke

Why I can not overwrite CXXFLAGS values?

In my system, the default CXXFLAGS is '-g -O2'. But, for a particular program, I need -O0 and without -g. I tried something like: bin_PROGRAS = xxx xxx_CXXFLAGS = -O0 in Makefile.am. But, the final CXXFLAGS used when I compile is actually -O0 -g -O2, the default CXXFLAGS appe

Re: How do I configure Makefile.am to run a program?

ns an exact copy of your existing poll.spec, but add the autoconf substitution variable, @svnrev@ where it make sense. In a Makefile.am in the directory containing your poll.spec file, add EXTRA_DIST = ... poll.spec I use this trick all the time and it works great! In fact, I generate most of m

Re: How do I configure Makefile.am to run a program?

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Bernd Jendrissek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 7:27 AM, John Calcote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Thanks, but the problem with this solution is that I would have to > > > rerun the .configure st

Re: How do I configure Makefile.am to run a program?

On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 7:27 AM, John Calcote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks, but the problem with this solution is that I would have to > > rerun the .configure step each time. Forgetting to do that is as as > > easy as forgetting to edit the spec file. How

Re: [Fwd: How do I get make to run a program during the make operation?]

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > noinst_PROGRAMS = poll.spec > poll_tmpl_SOURCES = poll.tmpl FORCE > .tmpl.spec: > ./logpoll.pl $< > > FORCE: [snip] > Can anyone suggest how I might accomplish what I thought was going to

Re: How do I configure Makefile.am to run a program?

Jim, Thanks, but the problem with this solution is that I would have to rerun the .configure step each time. Forgetting to do that is as as easy as forgetting to edit the spec file. Don't take this wrong - I totally believe you. But, I'm trying to figure out why this has never been

Re: How do I configure Makefile.am to run a program?

You typo'd. I wrote BUILT_SOURCES= ... Check out the docs. H -- > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I like to include my subversion version number in my rpm spec file so I > > can > > > keep track of the

Re: How do I configure Makefile.am to run a program?

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like to include my subversion version number in my rpm spec file so I > can > > keep track of the source used to generate the binary. I've been > manually > > changing it but since

Re: How do I configure Makefile.am to run a program?

e. > > In a Makefile.am in the directory containing your poll.spec file, add > > EXTRA_DIST = ... poll.spec > > I use this trick all the time and it works great! In fact, I generate most > of my rpm and debian build scripts this way. > > Regards, > John > > Hi Jo

Re: How do I configure Makefile.am to run a program?

You may also want: noinst_DATA = poll.spec H > > I like to include my subversion version number in my rpm spec file so I can > > keep track of the source used to generate the binary. I've been manually > > changing it but since I forget to sometimes, I'd like for m

Re: How do I configure Makefile.am to run a program?

> I like to include my subversion version number in my rpm spec file so I can > keep track of the source used to generate the binary. I've been manually > changing it but since I forget to sometimes, I'd like for make to generate > the spec file for me. I wrote a small per

Re: How do I configure Makefile.am to run a program?

Jim, I like to include my subversion version number in my rpm spec file so I can keep track of the source used to generate the binary. I've been manually changing it but since I forget to sometimes, I'd like for make to generate the spec file for me. I wrote a small perl program th

How do I configure Makefile.am to run a program?

I like to include my subversion version number in my rpm spec file so I can keep track of the source used to generate the binary. I've been manually changing it but since I forget to sometimes, I'd like for make to generate the spec file for me. I wrote a small perl program that reads

[Fwd: How do I get make to run a program during the make operation?]

I thought I sent this message but I never saw it show up. If it's a dup, please excuse me. Jim. --- Begin Message --- I like to include my subversion version number in my rpm spec file so I can keep track of the source used to generate the binary. I've been manually changing it b

Re: Include paths: no "-I." please

Hello, * J.T. Conklin wrote on Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 05:48:04AM CET: > overbored <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > How do I tell automake not to pass "-I." to g++/gcc? Thanks in advance. Use the nostdinc option: <http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Options

Re: Include paths: no "-I." please

overbored <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How do I tell automake not to pass "-I." to g++/gcc? Thanks in advance. > > (The problem is that this project has a string.h, which conflicts with > the standard string.h. Besides, why "-I." in the first place? Is it

Re: How do i get make install to only copy target if it was rebuilt

On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: It's possible to make your install-target depend on the file that you want to install, but doing that for several files can be tedious. I do this in regular makefiles, for instance $(INST

Re: How do i get make install to only copy target if it was rebuilt

Hello, * Benoit SIGOURE wrote on Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 10:46:47PM CEST: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-10/msg00070.html See this one as well: Cheers, Ralf

Re: How do i get make install to only copy target if it was rebuilt

Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's possible to make your install-target depend on the file that you > want to install, but doing that for several files can be tedious. I do > this in regular makefiles, for instance > $(INSTALLDIR)/foo: $(SRCDIR)/foo >

Re: How do i get make install to only copy target if it was rebuilt

On Jul 6, 2007, at 8:20 PM, Jeff Safier wrote: Make install seems to copy the target whether its been rebuilt or not and every time the file is copied it puts a new timestamp on the file. You might want to have a look at these two threads: ``install -C'' / unnecessarily updating time stamps h

Re: How do i get make install to only copy target if it was rebuilt

le to make your install-target depend on the file that you want to install, but doing that for several files can be tedious. I do this in regular makefiles, for instance $(INSTALLDIR)/foo: $(SRCDIR)/foo $(INSTALL) $(SRCDIR)/foo $(INSTALLDIR)/foo ...but don't expect to see autom

How do i get make install to only copy target if it was rebuilt

Make install seems to copy the target whether its been rebuilt or not and every time the file is copied it puts a new timestamp on the file. Jeff Safier Cornell-Mayo Associates 600 Lanidex Plaza Parsipanny, NJ 07054 Phone: (973) 887 3069 X119 Fax: (973) 887-0383 Information contained in this

Re: How do I get automake to create compressed man pages?

Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2007, 00:46 -0500 schrieb Paul Elliott: > Excuse me if this is a faq but I can not easily find the asnwer. > > I have a Makefile.am that creates and installs a man page myprog.1 > > It says > > man1_MANS = myprog.1 > > The source is myprog.1.

How do I get automake to create compressed man pages?

Excuse me if this is a faq but I can not easily find the asnwer. I have a Makefile.am that creates and installs a man page myprog.1 It says man1_MANS = myprog.1 The source is myprog.1. How do I make it create and install a compressed man page version myprog.1.gz? Thank You. -- Paul

Re: Some problems I had with texi/info files

Thank you Ralf for quick answer. It helps a lot. Truth to tell I did not read all GNU guide line since it's quiet a huge reading. You guess right: I was indeed using AM_MAINTAINER_MODE in the original project and I had just copy/cut it when I did the test project... my mistake. Everything

Re: Some problems I had with texi/info files

oject/project.texi:7: @include `version.texi': No such file or > directory. This problem will be fixed once you fix the first problem. > makeinfo -I ../project -o ../project/project.info ../project/project.texi > [...] > > Here I was expecting to have something like that:

Some problems I had with texi/info files

Hello all. The following example explains the problems I had. gentoo/gnu/linux kernel-2.6.20 i686 automake (GNU automake) 1.10 autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.61 The tree looks like +--project--+-- Makefile.am | +-- configure.ac | +-- project.texi | +--build >cat Makefile

Re: How do I write a configure.ac file to default sysconfdir to /etc?

Bob Proulx wrote: Jim Lynch wrote: I'd really like a way to enable this for specific applications, not as a site default. ... ... ... If not, I'll just have to go back to my cludgy way of adding my own rules to copy it to a hard coded /etc, (Ugh). What I do is to keep a co

Re: How do I write a configure.ac file to default sysconfdir to /etc?

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Jim, Please don't top-post, if possible. Thank you. * Jim Lynch wrote on Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:17:47PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Jim Lynch wrote on Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:13:41PM CET: >> [...] if I do a ./configure >> --sysconfdir=/e

Re: How do I write a configure.ac file to default sysconfdir to /etc?

Jim Lynch wrote: > I'd really like a way to enable this for specific applications, not > as a site default. ... ... ... If not, I'll just have to go back to > my cludgy way of adding my own rules to copy it to a hard coded > /etc, (Ugh). What I do is to keep a configure.s

Re: How do I write a configure.ac file to default sysconfdir to /etc?

Hello Jim, Please don't top-post, if possible. Thank you. * Jim Lynch wrote on Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:17:47PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Jim Lynch wrote on Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:13:41PM CET: >> [...] if I do a ./configure >> --sysconfdir=/etc I get what I want.

Re: How do I write a configure.ac file to default sysconfdir to /etc?

ldenhues wrote: > Hello Jim, > > This is actually an Autoconf question. I don't think that's easy to > infer, though. > > * Jim Lynch wrote on Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:13:41PM CET: > >> [...] if I do a ./configure >> --sysconfdir=/etc I get what I want.

Re: How do I write a configure.ac file to default sysconfdir to /etc?

Hello Jim, This is actually an Autoconf question. I don't think that's easy to infer, though. * Jim Lynch wrote on Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:13:41PM CET: > [...] if I do a ./configure > --sysconfdir=/etc I get what I want. However as I advance in age, I > forget mor

How do I write a configure.ac file to default sysconfdir to /etc?

I have an application where most of what I need installed goes to /usr/local/*, except I really want to put stuff in /etc. By default sysconfdir gets set to /usr/local/etc but if I do a ./configure --sysconfdir=/etc I get what I want. However as I advance in age, I forget more than I used to so

Re: How do I get configuration files installed?

I noted this message still lying around in my autotools folder... * Jim Lynch wrote on Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:43:17AM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Jim Lynch wrote on Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 02:46:04PM CEST: > > > >> I'm trying to figure out how to

Re: How do I *conditionally* add to INSTALL_DIRS ?

Hello, On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:19:38AM +0900, atoz wrote: > if WANT_MAN_PAGES > cp fooman.8 $(foomandir) > fi ... > and it leads to the following error ... > > Makefile.am:175: unterminated conditionals: WANT_MAN_PAGES_TRUE this question is easy: Automake conditionals are ended by "en

Re: How do I *conditionally* add to INSTALL_DIRS ?

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK, but you insist on the targets `man-pages' and `readme', you can just put the whole block inside an if: if MAN_PAGES man-pages: # do your stuff else man-pages: # do nothing fi my vars are called WANT_MAN_PAGES, WANT_README etc, but other than tha

Re: How do I *conditionally* add to INSTALL_DIRS ?

what magic does automake do with the variable INSTALL_DIRS? EXTRA_DIST can just be added to as well, not much magic either. fooman_MANS and foodoc_DATA come to mind as special variables, if you are ok with having things installed by 'make install-data' or plain 'make instal

Re: How do I *conditionally* add to INSTALL_DIRS ?

\ fi you can do this for example: # configure.ac snippet: AM_CONDITIONAL([MAN_PAGES], [test -n "$with_man_pages"]) AM_CONDITIONAL([FOO_DOCS], [test -n "$with_readme$with_license$with_credits$with_sgml_docs"]) I already have the above in my configure.ac file # Makefile.am s

Re: How do I *conditionally* add to INSTALL_DIRS ?

Hello atoz, * atoz wrote on Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 12:03:54PM CET: > I have added some install options to configure, for example ... > > --with-man-pages > --with-readme > > and some others If you go by the GNU Coding Standards, you should use --enable for these, as

How do I *conditionally* add to INSTALL_DIRS ?

I have added some install options to configure, for example ... --with-man-pages --with-readme and some others I then tried to get automake to add the relevant instructions via automake.am INSTALL_DIRS, like so ... # man pages if test -n "${with_man_pages}"; then \ IN

Re: How do I get configuration files installed?

n!) > > Wouldn't it be enough if you used $(libdir), and told your users > that if they want to shoot themselves mildly in the foot, they could > still use > ./configure --bindir=/some/where/bin --libdir=/some/where/bin/lib > ? > > I mean, this convention goes against

Re: I can do it in Makefile.in but not sure how to translate it to Makefile.am

Actually from my last e-mail it got me thinking concerning the outside program doing something to the make file - I found it and I seem to have fixed the problem. There's a perl script that gets run just after automake is finished that generated the line I was worried about. I've

Re: I can do it in Makefile.in but not sure how to translate it to Makefile.am

gets rebuilt from Makefile.am this gets hosed. I don't understand the question. If you add that code to Makefile.am, it will be copied to Makefile.in exactly by automake. What gets hosed? Maybe there's merely a typo (note only one of the rule lines starts with a TAB)? The problem stem

Re: I can do it in Makefile.in but not sure how to translate it to Makefile.am

efile.in gets rebuilt > from Makefile.am this gets hosed. I don't understand the question. If you add that code to Makefile.am, it will be copied to Makefile.in exactly by automake. What gets hosed? Maybe there's merely a typo (note only one of the rule lines starts with a TAB)? Cheers, Ralf

I can do it in Makefile.in but not sure how to translate it to Makefile.am

Evening, I'm a bit confused on how to accomplish what I need to do, I have a Makefile.in that I need to adjust a single target: kcookieserver_skel.cpp: kcookieserver.kidl $(DCOPIDL2CPP) --c++-suffix cpp --no-signals --no-stub kcookieserver.kidl basically when this target

Re: How do I get configuration files installed?

hat if they want to shoot themselves mildly in the foot, they could still use ./configure --bindir=/some/where/bin --libdir=/some/where/bin/lib ? I mean, this convention goes against all I've ever seen on a *nix system. If instead you are out to get things working on w32 systems, then

Re: How do I get configuration files installed?

Jim Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm trying to figure out how to add a file to be installed in > $prefix/bin/lib. Are you sure you want that and not $libdir or even $datadir? > But when I put > bin_SCRIPTS=bin/float.pl bin/work.pl bin/lib/cipher.txt > in there

How do I get configuration files installed?

I'm trying to figure out how to add a file to be installed in $prefix/bin/lib. I'm able to add files to bin by putting bin_SCRIPTS=bin/float.pl bin/work.pl in my Makefile.AM But when I put bin_SCRIPTS=bin/float.pl bin/work.pl bin/lib/cipher.txt in there, it simply puts ciper.txt i

Re: autoreconf not passing -I option to aclocal

Hello, [let's move to the automake list; please keep Guillaume in the cc] On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:39:45AM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Moreover, it requires me to specify a path to a file external to my > package, which I don't want to do. well, this is the root of t

Re: How do I make a "-config" script?

where > >this should be standardized? > Tyler, > > It's pretty trivial to make one of the *-config scripts by hand, or > even "automate" their generation by making them an autoconf template > (presuming someone doesn't use DESTDIR or relocate after the fac

Re: How do I make a "-config" script?

Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: scripts that give you information like includes, libraries, etc... is there some autoconf/automake/other magic i can use to automatically generate one of these for my distribution? Nope. Such *-config scripts are ordinary, manually w

Re: How do I make a "-config" script?

Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > scripts that give you information like includes, libraries, etc... is there > > some autoconf/automake/other magic i can use to automatically generate one > > of these for my distribution? > Nope. Such *-config scripts are

Re: How do I make a "-config" script?

On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 13:49 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote: > A lot of packages (libxml2, APR, gnome, etc) come with these "-config" > scripts that give you information like includes, libraries, etc... is there > some autoconf/automake/other magic i can use to automatically gene

How do I make a "-config" script?

A lot of packages (libxml2, APR, gnome, etc) come with these "-config" scripts that give you information like includes, libraries, etc... is there some autoconf/automake/other magic i can use to automatically generate one of these for my distribution? Thanks, Tyler

Re: question about DEFAULT_INCLUDES and -I.

Hi Ralf, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Harald, > > * Harald Dunkel wrote on Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:44:55AM CEST: >> it seems that DEFAULT_INCLUDES is set deeply within >> automake.pl to >> >> DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -I. -I$(srcdir) > > Only if not using th

Re: question about DEFAULT_INCLUDES and -I.

Hi Harald, * Harald Dunkel wrote on Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:44:55AM CEST: > > it seems that DEFAULT_INCLUDES is set deeply within > automake.pl to > > DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -I. -I$(srcdir) Only if not using the Automake option `nostdinc'. > What is the reasoning he

question about DEFAULT_INCLUDES and -I.

Hi folks, it seems that DEFAULT_INCLUDES is set deeply within automake.pl to DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -I. -I$(srcdir) What is the reasoning here? Doesn't this undermine the difference between #include "myheader.h" and #include ? Regards Harri

Re: [Fwd: autoreconf and aclocal options (-I, --ac-dir)]

Hello, On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:00:23AM -0400, Chris Pickett wrote: > It could also be nice if autoreconf passed the -I flag to aclocal. I > don't think it would matter if dirs not containing macros were in the > list. Just an idea. well, I'm not sure. autoconf -I mi

Re: where do I have to add the macros

* netman (sent by Nabble.com) wrote on Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 07:51:34PM CET: > > I have a software in two versions I wanted to add a test plugin into > one of them I put my test file in the plugin folder and then modified > the makefle.am. but I have not the file configure.ac Well,

where do I have to add the macros

Hi I have a software in two versions I wanted to add a test plugin into one of them I put my test file in the plugin folder and then modified the makefle.am. but I have not the file configure.ac while I have read in dics that it is needed for autoconf well I saw these errors : libtoolize

  1   2   3   >