On Monday 11 June 2001 10:35 pm, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Gary> I never did get the joke with `make mrproper' what is that all
> Gary> about anyway?...
>
> A Procter and Gamble cleaning product. In France ``Monsieur Propre''.
>
> www.mo
> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> I never did get the joke with `make mrproper' what is that all
Gary> about anyway?...
A Procter and Gamble cleaning product. In France ``Monsieur Propre''.
www.monsieurpropre.com
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 7:57 pm, Eric Siegerman wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 06:49:46PM +0100, Gary V . Vaughan wrote:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/autobook/autobook_43.html#SEC43
>
> (Minor typo on that page, btw: in "CVS does not preserve
> relatively timestamps", delete the "ly"
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 06:49:46PM +0100, Gary V . Vaughan wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 May 2001 6:43 pm, Eric Siegerman wrote:
> > The bootstrap could be a simple shell script that makes no
> > attempt to optimize out unnecessary actions -- after all, you
> > would rarely be running it unless all the
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 6:43 pm, Eric Siegerman wrote:
> The bootstrap could be a simple shell script that makes no
> attempt to optimize out unnecessary actions -- after all, you
> would rarely be running it unless all the actions *were*
> necessary.
Like this?
http://sources.redhat.com/autoboo
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 06:46:03PM +0100, Gary V . Vaughan wrote:
> On Saturday 19 May 2001 3:41 pm, Reinhard M?ller wrote:
> > How about TOTALLYCLEAN or COMPLETELYCLEAN and defining it as removing
> > everything that can be rebuilt somehow (e.g. with autoconf, automake,
> > libtoolize, etc.)
Ye
> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> Why not, many projects roll a `cvs-dist' and suchlike? It is
Gary> certainly orthogonal...
If you want to roll back to a clean cvs checkout, there is already a
tool to do this. Prefacing it with `make' doesn't add anything, IMHO.
On Saturday 19 May 2001 3:41 pm, Reinhard M?ller wrote:
> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> > ... but I beleive that such target should not rely on CVS (since
> > not everybody use CVS). I'd would prefer to have a
> > MAINTAINERDISTCLEANFILES variable in Makefile.am, for
> > consistency with other c
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> ... but I beleive that such target should not rely on CVS (since
> not everybody use CVS). I'd would prefer to have a
> MAINTAINERDISTCLEANFILES variable in Makefile.am, for
> consistency with other clean-targets.
How about TOTALLYCLEAN or COMPLETELYCLEAN and defini
On Saturday 19 May 2001 1:29 pm, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gary> Anyway, I'm happy to check a copy of Pavel's cvsclean
> [...]
> Gary> If I convert it from perl to shell, would you be
> Gary> interested in accepting as a new automa
>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Gary> If intallers have `make clean' and `make distclean', the
Gary> maintainers corrollary is `make maintainer-clean' and
Gary> `make cvs-clean' (maintainer-distclean?). I do this *all
Gary> the time*!
I too would like to have
On Friday 18 May 2001 1:09 am, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Gary> I have always tried to have maintainer-clean revert the source
> Gary> tree to the state it was in when freshly checked out of CVS.
>
> This is easy enough to do; there is a too
> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> I have always tried to have maintainer-clean revert the source
Gary> tree to the state it was in when freshly checked out of CVS.
This is easy enough to do; there is a tool in the `cvsutils' (Pavel's,
not Alexandre's) which will re
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
> That's interesting. I have always tried to have maintainer-clean revert the
> source tree to the state it was in when freshly checked out of CVS. Giving
> this some thought, it seems to be something that can't easily be fully
> automated by automake since people have v
On Thursday 17 May 2001 4:19 am, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Reinhard" == Reinhard Mller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Reinhard> I am just reading the GNU coding standards (chapter 7.2.5 -
> Reinhard> Standard Make Targets) and I see that it's recommended that
> Reinhard> maintainer-clean should
> "Reinhard" == Reinhard Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Reinhard> I am just reading the GNU coding standards (chapter 7.2.5 -
Reinhard> Standard Make Targets) and I see that it's recommended that
Reinhard> maintainer-clean should not delete files that are necessary
Reinhard> to run config
I am just reading the GNU coding standards (chapter 7.2.5 - Standard
Make Targets) and I see that it's recommended that maintainer-clean
should not delete files that are necessary to run configure.
Makefile.in's are necessary to successfully run configure, as well as
most of the other files i men
17 matches
Mail list logo
