>>>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Gary> Why not, many projects roll a `cvs-dist' and suchlike? It is Gary> certainly orthogonal... If you want to roll back to a clean cvs checkout, there is already a tool to do this. Prefacing it with `make' doesn't add anything, IMHO. Also, a `cvs-clean' rule won't work for the recipient of a distribution. In other words, we'd be adding a target to every Makefile which (1) is redundant given Pavel's cvs-utils, and (2) only works for the maintainers anyway. Tom
- Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Reinhard Müller
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Tom Tromey
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Gary V . Vaughan
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Reinhard Müller
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Tom Tromey
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Gary V . Vaughan
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Gary V . Vaughan
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Reinhard Müller
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Gary V . Vaughan
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Tom Tromey
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Eric Siegerman
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Gary V . Vaughan
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Eric Siegerman
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Gary V . Vaughan
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Akim Demaille
- Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean Gary V . Vaughan