On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 06:49:46PM +0100, Gary V . Vaughan wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 May 2001 6:43 pm, Eric Siegerman wrote:
> > The bootstrap could be a simple shell script that makes no
> > attempt to optimize out unnecessary actions -- after all, you
> > would rarely be running it unless all the actions *were*
> > necessary.
>
> Like this?
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/autobook/autobook_43.html#SEC43
Yeah, pretty much. Except that, as you imply, the bootstrap
script *should* be part of the distribution -- if for no other
reason, then for the benefit of those who check the distribution
into a private CVS repo, and thus get the foo/foo.in timestamps
switched around on them (CVS is guaranteed to screw this up on a
"cvs update", since it updates the files in sorted order, and,
for all values of "X", "X" sorts before "X.in").
(Minor typo on that page, btw: in "CVS does not preserve
relatively timestamps", delete the "ly".)
> > PRISTINE
> > (No smiley; I mean it.)
>
> MRPROPER?
>
> :-) I never did get the joke with `make mrproper' what is that all about
> anyway?...
Mr. Clean?
Dr. Pepper?
I dunno... That's from Linux, isn't it? Maybe you have to know
Finnish to get it.
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | /
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea.
- RFC 1925 (quoting an unnamed source)
