Diego Elio Pettenò writes:
> On 31/01/2013 20:58, Jack Kelly wrote:
>> IMHO, that seems like a great way to cause trouble for unsuspecting
>> users. (Anyone remember KDE4.0?) Can you expand on why you think it's a
>> good plan?
>
> Because unlike KDE, automake
Diego Elio Pettenò writes:
> Okay that sounds reasonable. I would be more toward 24 than 18 — maybe
> going for 18 to the next "beta"-quality automake, 24 to the final
> release. Speaking of which I would suggest that we call X.0 the betas,
> and suggest general usage only when X.1 is out...
IMHO
Stefano Lattarini writes:
> So I propose the following change in the Automake versioning scheme:
>
> * Major releases should actually have the major version number bumped.
> That is, the next major Automake version will be 2.0, rather than
> 1.14; and the major version after that will be
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jack Kelly wrote on Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 06:13:58AM CEST:
>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:55 AM, tsuna wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> >> As my java foo is pretty weak,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:55 AM, tsuna wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Stefano Lattarini
> wrote:
>> As my java foo is pretty weak, I'm not sure how to handle jar manifests,
>> jar entry points, or other jar/javac subtleties and advanced features.
>> Suggestions welcome.
>
> You can cre
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> [ adding autoconf-patches; this is <http://debbugs.gnu.org/8111> ]
>
> * Jack Kelly wrote on Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:49:44PM CET:
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> > Can we fix this
I disagree that `make prefix=... install' is a poor man's DESTDIR.
Installing using DESTDIR will install things in
$(DESTDIR)/$(prefix)/bin (and so on), which is a right pain when it
comes to using something like GNU Stow to manage /usr/local.
-- Jack
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Ralf Wildenhu
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Stefano Lattarini
wrote:
> On Sunday 05 December 2010, Jack Kelly wrote:
>> Remark: This may be unrelated.
>>
>> I don't know about overriding in Makefile.am, but overriding $(prefix)
>> is important for supporting GNU Stow. To s
Remark: This may be unrelated.
I don't know about overriding in Makefile.am, but overriding $(prefix)
is important for supporting GNU Stow. To set up a package for Stow,
you configure for one prefix and install under another (note that this
isn't the same as using $(DESTDIR) - that dumps the whole
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues writes:
>
>> Unfortunately, Automake doesn't yet provide a good API for directory
>> stamping yet. You can easily use your own though, that don't interfere
>> with automake's stamps and rules:
>>
>> subdir/generated-file: su
Hello list,
I am writing a nonrecursive Makefile.am, and cannot find the
recommended way of requiring that directories in the source tree have
had their equivalents created in the build tree. This has led me to
write rules like this:
8<---
doc/fake437-primitive.texi: doc/$(am__dirstamp)
include/f
11 matches
Mail list logo
