Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu> writes: > Okay that sounds reasonable. I would be more toward 24 than 18 — maybe > going for 18 to the next "beta"-quality automake, 24 to the final > release. Speaking of which I would suggest that we call X.0 the betas, > and suggest general usage only when X.1 is out...
IMHO, that seems like a great way to cause trouble for unsuspecting users. (Anyone remember KDE4.0?) Can you expand on why you think it's a good plan? Is there a system like X.beta1, X.beta2, ..., X.0 that is going to fit the ordering system for most package managers? Bonus points if it works in asciibetical order, too. -- Jack
