Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > > > > and substitution of existing Makefile defines (but not defines based > > on autoconf substituted values) should also work so the following > > should produce the same result: > > > > FOO_BAR=foo/bar++ > > $(xlate $(FOO_BAR))_SOURCES > > > > This

Re: non recursive includes proof of concept #2

On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 07:52:37PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > It transforms macros and paths in an included file (called > Makefile.rules for now) , to make them suitable for a non-recursive > build. > > As show by the test cases, this allows a couple of neat things: > 1) A stub Makefile.am >

Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue

On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 02:10, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > > Hmm, I'd prefer to do it via the include mechanism - see my crude, but > > effective updated proof of concept - posted here a minute ago. > > I like your include approach. It helps convert existing recursive > builds into non-recursive build

Re: SUBDIRs and slashes

On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 09:47, Joerg Faschingbauer wrote: > > "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "Marty" == Marty Leisner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > adl> [...] > > Marty> common/Makefile.am:1: directory should not contain `/' > > Marty> Just wondering for som

Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue

On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 07:08, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > By 'read only', I mean that there is an existing source tree with no > Makefile.am's (perhaps it uses some other build system) and you are > not allowed to (or shouldn't) update it. Since Automake supports > subdirectories, the Makefile.am does

Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 02:10, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > > > Hmm, I'd prefer to do it via the include mechanism - see my crude, but > > > effective updated proof of concept - posted here a minute ago. > > > > I like your include approach. It helps convert

oops, regression - updated proof of concept - #2a

A minor oversight led to a regression, which I caught when the test cases finished running... here's a replacement patch. (Still use the test cases from my previous email). Rob -- GPG key available at: . Index: automake.in ===

Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue

On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 03:49, Jirka Hanika wrote: > My view is that these (and other) problems disappear if you use a > per-directory Makefile.am; but I also see the benefits (esp. compilation > speed) of a non-recursive Makefile. So the solution could be to support > generating a single Makefile

Re: Non-recursive make & maintenance issue

On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 04:29, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > It is not a problem as long as Automake provides sufficient > automatic translation capabilities. There just needs to be a standard > way to create definitions and refer to existing definitions, including > those that Automake generates for it

Re: failure building HEAD

On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 18:09, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > Robert> configure:1847: cd conftest && eval autoconf -o /dev/null conftest.ac > Robert> autom4te: cannot open /dev/null.tmp: Permission denied > > Robert> Is thi

FINANCIAL Independence Is Calling You...jiro

Got your attention? Let me show you the way Financial Independence: www.saax.org?axel=49 No more advertisements, thanks - www.5jzd.org/out5s/pre-rem2e.asp aripfhqhbonin mg rjb drqyqdzqy i tirof zpp efj j nlxeg

non recursive includes proof of concept #2

Well, I finally snuck in a little time to update my proof of concept for non recursive includes. Still, I don't code perl - and it shows ;). How to use? Grab CVS automake, apply thepatch, drop the test files into tests subdir. Have a look at the test cases to see how to use it. What does it do

Re: SUBDIRs and slashes

> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: "Marty" == Marty Leisner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: adl> [...] Marty> common/Makefile.am:1: directory should not contain `/' Marty> Just wondering for some thoughts on this matter...is Marty> there any reason to insist on sing

Re: failure building HEAD

>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Robert> configure:1847: cd conftest && eval autoconf -o /dev/null conftest.ac Robert> autom4te: cannot open /dev/null.tmp: Permission denied Robert> Is this a 'need to use 2.59' thing? (If so, the error is misleading). It works