On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 02:10, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > > Hmm, I'd prefer to do it via the include mechanism - see my crude, but > > effective updated proof of concept - posted here a minute ago. > > I like your include approach. It helps convert existing recursive > builds into non-recursive builds with minimum pain. However, there > are sufficient reasons to write only one Makefile (e.g. source tree is > treated as "read only", or personal preference) that both mechanisms > should be supported.
I'm not arguing against the single-big-file-method... but I am curious: how does a 'read only' source tree affect this? If there is a Makefile.am in it that you want to use without alteration, you can just SUBDIRS= x y z #not subdir DIST_SUBDIRS=x y z subdir subdir_include subdir/Makefile.am Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
