| > Could you give more details on these steps? What can be done to have
| > it right without tuning by hand?
|
| What I set is:
| PATH_SEPARATOR=:
| TEST_FINDS_EXE=Y
Wow, are you telling us we no longer need to dive into `test $ac_x'
and things like this?
| CC=gcc
That's a known problem of
There are several macros in Autoconf that are checking whether a
function exists and works and set HAVE_FUN accordingly. This is the
strategy I adopted when I stole AC_FUNC_GETGROUPS from Jim, although
his original macro was defining HAVE_WORKING_GETGROUPS.
I think Autoconf should advocate a si
| Hi,
|
| In a package I'm integrating autoconf into, I need to be able to
| support cross-compiling. Specifically, the libraries in the package
| will be cross-compiled. However, the package contains a compiler
| binary that must be run on the build platform, not the host platform.
| This mea
On 6 Jun 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mo> I am stumped. Is something wrong with the
> Mo> AC_REQUIRE([AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR_DEFAULT]) such that is no longer
> Mo> includes the text from AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR_DEFAULT?
>
> Could you set up a small c
Maybe you fell on the AC_REQUIRE problem which was once pointed out by
Axel Thimm. I'll try to adapt his patch to CVS Autoconf. But maybe
it is unrelated, and is caused by the fact that Libtool has to do a
lot of things which are very intimate with Autoconf. But Autoconf is
responsible for thi
> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mo> I am stumped. Is something wrong with the
Mo> AC_REQUIRE([AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR_DEFAULT]) such that is no longer
Mo> includes the text from AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR_DEFAULT?
Could you set up a small configure.in which demonstrates the problem?
Greg A. Woods writes:
> It turns out that some versions of *BSD "install" (aka xinstall.c in the
> 4.4bsd distribution) don't allow '-c' and '-d' at the same time (and
> strictly speaking none should).
> Of course this crops up because some authors using Autoconf (and
> Automake) have the (good,
> other similiar environment . My preference would be to test for programs
> using 'prog_to_find${ac_exeext}'. Then somehow figure out when ${ac_exeext}
> needs to be set without resorting to compiling a program.
or at least allow it be set in config.site until a test can be divined.
>
> | TEST_FINDS_EXE=Y
>
> Wow, are you telling us we no longer need to dive into `test $ac_x'
> and things like this?
It's a solution designed so we don't have to modify configure scripts, but
it's a hack. And it's a DJGPP-only solution, so it doesn't help EMX or any
other similiar environme
> "Mark" == Mark E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | TEST_FINDS_EXE=Y
>>
>> Wow, are you telling us we no longer need to dive into `test $ac_x'
>> and things like this?
Mark> It's a solution designed so we don't have to modify configure
Mark> scripts, but it's a hack. And it's a DJGPP-only
> OK, so we must start working on this.
A unified solution is certainly desirable. But perhaps we should find out how
urgent a solution to this problem is before you decide to take on this
problem for the next release. DJGPP's Bash has a solution (TEST_FINDS_EXE as
mentioned), Cygwin (I've bee
[ On Tuesday, June 6, 2000 at 18:09:13 (+0200), Peter Eisentraut wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: proposed change to setting of INSTALL (and friends)
>
> Greg A. Woods writes:
>
> > It turns out that some versions of *BSD "install" (aka xinstall.c in the
> > 4.4bsd distribution) don't allow '-c' and '
--- Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-8<-
> But after all, maybe just basing our decisions on uname is enough.
> Yes, this is against the philosophy of Autoconf, but it's better than
> nothing. And I guess we don't have to fear portability problems with
> uname, since I suppose the enviro
--- "Mark E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > other similiar environment . My preference would be to test for programs
> > using 'prog_to_find${ac_exeext}'. Then somehow figure out when ${ac_exeext}
>
> > needs to be set without resorting to compiling a program.
>
> or at least allow it be set
I was looking back at the ChangeLog when I noticed this:
2000-05-23 Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Simplify the interface: users shouldn't need to explicitly check
for special environments.
* acspecific.m4 (AC_EXEEXT, AC_OBJEXT): AU defined to
nothing. Repl
We are an International Mail Order Company looking for individuals with a GREAT
WORK ETHIC and the DESIRE to Earn at Least $500 - $1,500 per Month Part Time
or $2,000 to more than $7,000 per Month Full Time WORKING FROM HOME!
The demand for our product line (over 150 different products) is so gre
16 matches
Mail list logo
