> OK, so we must start working on this.
A unified solution is certainly desirable. But perhaps we should find out how
urgent a solution to this problem is before you decide to take on this
problem for the next release. DJGPP's Bash has a solution (TEST_FINDS_EXE as
mentioned), Cygwin (I've been told) has a similiar solution, and I don't know
about EMX.
>
> But after all, maybe just basing our decisions on uname is enough.
I'm convinced there is a good way to do this without resorting to uname, yet
nobody has yet to find one.
> Aah! I just spotted the problem:
>
> Mark> +no_x=yes
>
> The test suite verify that we stay in the ac_ name space, but there
> are exceptions. And the exception for `no_x' is not in the test
> suite. I will fix this.
Ok
> [debug-96]
Yep, I'm lost too. We'd need help from an expert :( Have you tried
> to run it by hand? It is important that you do, because I know the
> debug scripts are sometimes doing illegal fds manipulations.
I ran autoheader with '-d' to preserve traces.sh.
traces.sh:
m4trace:c:/djgpp/tmp/ac7778/stdin:2: -1- AC_CONFIG_HEADERS(config.h)
m4trace:c:/djgpp/tmp/ac7778/stdin:3: -1- AC_DEFINE(this, "whatever you
want.")
