--- Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -8<- > But after all, maybe just basing our decisions on uname is enough. > Yes, this is against the philosophy of Autoconf, but it's better than > nothing. And I guess we don't have to fear portability problems with > uname, since I suppose the environments we want to check for do > support it, right? > -8<- Correct. ===== --- Earnie Boyd: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__ Cygwin Newbies: <http://www.freeyellow.com/members5/gw32/index.html> __Minimalist GNU for Windows__ Mingw32 List: <http://www.egroups.com/group/mingw32/> Mingw Home: <http://www.mingw.org/> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints! http://photos.yahoo.com
- DJGPP testsuite results Mark E.
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Akim Demaille
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Mark E.
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Akim Demaille
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Mark E.
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Akim Demaille
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Mark E.
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Akim Demaille
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Mark E.
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Mark E.
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Earnie Boyd
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Earnie Boyd
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Mark E.
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Akim Demaille
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Mark E.
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Akim Demaille
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Mark E.
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Akim Demaille
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Akim Demaille
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Mark E.
- Re: DJGPP testsuite results Mark E.