Authors and *AD,
[AD - please review and weigh in on Question 21.]
While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as necessary) the
following questions, which are also in the XML file.
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
Thank you, Lynne. Please record in https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9728
that I approve of the publication of the current draft as RFC 9728.
Phil, Aaron, do you concur?
Thanks all,
-- Mike
-Original Message-
From: Lynn
I concur
Phil
> On Apr 15, 2025, at 10:09 PM, Michael Jones
> wrote:
>
> Thank you, Lynne. Please record in
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9728 that I approve of the publication
> of the current draft as RFC 9728.
>
> Phil, Aaron, do you concur?
>
>
Hi, Mike. Thanks for your replies! We have updated this document per your
notes below.
Apologies for the missing space before the email address; thank you for
catching that!
We also removed the " From: Michael Jones
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 5:29 PM
> To: 'Lynne Bartholomew' ; Aaron Pare
Hi there, I have no idea, my email account is perfectly fine and I do
receive ietf notifications. Yet if that's really an issue you may use
fabien.imba...@gmail.com if needed.
Best regards
Fabien
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025, 21:06 Justin Richer, wrote:
> Hi Karen,
>
> This happened recently with RFC963
Great! So noted (https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9750). We will prepare
this document for publication shortly.
Thank you!
RFC Editor/lb
> On Apr 15, 2025, at 10:53 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> Approved.
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 10:01 AM Lynne Bartholomew
> wrote:
> Hi, Srinivas a
Hi Enrico,
Thank you for your reply! We have updated the document as requested. Please
take a moment to review the changes and ensure they appear as desired.
For the following:
>> 4) We note that the ISO reference has been withdrawn and is no longer
>> available. There are two updated versions
Hi, Srinivas and Eric.
Srinivas, we have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9750
Eric, here are the latest files. No new iteration. Please refresh your
browser:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750.txt
https://www.rfc-editor.org
Dear Sarah, dear RFC Editor,
Just checking whether the authors, the AD (or the IANA) have still some pending
actions before the publication of these two RFCs ?
Regards
-éric
On 09/04/2025, 06:28, "Stuart Cheshire" wrote:
On Apr 8, 2025, at 13:42, Sarah Tarrant
mailto:starr...@staff.rfc-edit
Lynne, also please remove the "
>>
> Please use this wording, as we identified another ambiguity in the previous
> wording:
>
> These values, such as the jwks_uri (see Section 2), may be
> used with other specifications; for example, the public keys published
> in the jwks_uri can be used to verif
10 matches
Mail list logo
