[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9691 for your review

Hi Rob, Thank you for your reply! We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9691). Now that we have all author approvals, we will ask IANA to make their updates. Thank you, RFC Editor/mc > On Dec 10, 2024, at 4:36 PM, Rob

[auth48] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9691 for your review

IANA, Please make the following updates to the registries listed below: 1) For the "SMI Security for S/MIME CMS Content Type (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1)" registry, please add Section 2.1 to the reference column for Decimal 50 (

[auth48] [IANA #1408906] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9691 for your review

Hi Madison, These changes are complete: https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers https://www.iana.org/assignments/rpki Thanks, Sabrina Tanamal Lead IANA Services Specialist On Wed Dec 11 16:23:10 2024, mchu...@amsl.com wrote: > IANA, > > Please make the following updates to the registri

[auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 for your review

*IMPORTANT* Updated 2024/12/11 RFC Author(s): -- Instructions for Completing AUTH48 Your document has now entered AUTH48. Once it has been reviewed and approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC. If an author is no longer available, there are sever

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 for your review

Authors, While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as necessary) the following questions, which are also in the XML file. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) Thank you. RFC Editor/mc/ar On Dec 11, 2024, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote: *IMPORTAN

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9698 for your review

Hi Arnt, We have updated the document as described below. Please review and let us know if any additional updates are needed or if you approve the RFC for publication. The files are available here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9698.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc96

[auth48] Re: error in the PDF -Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9639 for your review

Hi Martijn, Thank you for your review. We have updated the document and posted the files here for your review: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9639.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9639.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9639.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9672 for your review

Hi all, We have removed mention of [IEEE_802.11-2024]. Please note that this means there will be no citation or informational reference to the document itself; the reference to the IEEE_802.11 WG ([IEEE_802.11]) remains. You can view the updated files here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth

[auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 for your review

*IMPORTANT* Updated 2024/12/11 RFC Author(s): -- Instructions for Completing AUTH48 Your document has now entered AUTH48. Once it has been reviewed and approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC. If an author is no longer available, there are sever

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 for your review

Authors, While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as necessary) the following questions, which are also in the XML file. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) 17) 18) 19) 20) 21) 22) 23)

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9610 for your review

Hi Madison, On further review I found one error plus a few small indentation inconsistencies in the examples. I have corrected these; please see attached XML. Kind regards, Neil. ]> http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"; sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" tocInclude="true" consensus="true" upd

[auth48] [IANA #1408111] [IANA] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9701 for your review

Hi, These changes are complete: On Mon Dec 09 21:54:43 2024, apal...@amsl.com wrote: > IANA, > > Please update your registries as follows to match the edited document > at https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9701-diff.html. > > > 1) Please remove the periods from the following descriptions i

[auth48] Re: error in the PDF -Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9639 for your review

Hi Sandy, This looks great, I approve. Many thanks for incorporating, and improving on, my suggestion. Kind regards, Martijn van Beurden Op do 12 dec 2024 00:36 schreef Sandy Ginoza : > Hi Martijn, > > Thank you for your review. We have updated the document and posted the > files here for you