The Emacs manual says
• The AUCTeX package provides more advanced features for editing TeX
and its related formats, including the ability to preview TeX
equations within Emacs buffers. Unlike BibTeX mode and the RefTeX
package, AUCTeX is not distributed with Emacs by default.
The Emacs manual says
• The AUCTeX package provides more advanced features for editing TeX
and its related formats, including the ability to preview TeX
equations within Emacs buffers.
Feature comparison question:
The preview feature is clearly a key feature.
Is there a broader
Uwe Brauer writes:
"AE" == Arash Esbati writes:
>
>> Uwe Brauer writes:
>>> I presume, he wants to clone GNU emacs from the git repository, compile
>>> it and auctex is already included in that tree, like gnus, so that it
>>> would not be necessary to use the package system.
>
>> Ah, thank
Arash Esbati writes:
> Jeremy Bryant writes:
>
>> There are however at least 2 scenarios where there are benefits to
>> having auctex, a functional albeit perhaps not the most recent version,
>> in a distribution of Emacs.
>>
>> 1.
>> New LaTeX user
Tassilo Horn writes:
> Jeremy Bryant writes:
>
>> Indeed, I agree it is very convenient to upgrade auctex through ELPA.
>>
>> There are however at least 2 scenarios where there are benefits to
>> having auctex, a functional albeit perhaps not the most recent
&g
Arash Esbati writes:
> Jeremy Bryant writes:
>
>> Great, this seems to be a major obstacle removed!
>
> That was a good change also for other reasons -- kudos to Keita for
> doing it.
>
>> Again, this only works if users are provided with general network
>&g
Arash Esbati writes:
> Tassilo Horn writes:
>
>> I guess when you only write short documents like letters, there's
>> probably no need for all those features that come with AUCTeX. But
>> that's just a guess. No actual user told me their reasons.
>
> This is also what I've read over the time:
Arash Esbati writes:
> Jeremy Bryant writes:
>
>> Arash, is the below wording on copyright assignment(from your link)
>> still accurate?
>
> See Tassilo's response.
>
>> Are new contributors checked
>
> Of course.
>
> Best, Arash
OK
Arash Esbati writes:
> Jeremy Bryant writes:
>
>> Philip, my suggestion was to continue on adapting AUCTeX for emacs.git
>>
>> Alternatively, I can volunteer to work on a prototype bundling of
>> AUCTeX, but would need your suggestions on this.
>
> The
Arash Esbati writes:
> Paul Nelson writes:
>
>> There is some relevant discussion at
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/8wpatw/auctex_vs_texmode_or_giving_a_texmode_another/,
>> which notes the slower load time of AUCTeX (once per session), some
>> difference in the behavior of imenu (no
Having tested Paul's preview-auto package, this would be a clear
candidate for either merging or at least distribution with AUCTeX.
Is there a mathematician that would write TeX and use preview but not
use preview-auto?
Uwe Brauer writes:
>>>> "JB" == Jeremy Bryant writes:
>
>> Having tested Paul's preview-auto package, this would be a clear
>> candidate for either merging or at least distribution with AUCTeX.
>
>> Is there a mathematician that would wr
Arash Esbati writes:
> Hi all,
>
> you may have seen that there was some work in creating a new branch
> 'main' which can be used easily to make an ELPA release by anyone who
> has write access to AUCTeX repo. We have now 6 releases this way under
> our belt and it works quite smooth.
>
> The lo
Arash Esbati writes:
> Hi Jean-François,
>
> jfbu writes:
>
>> I have noticed the "main" branch has a number of 14.0.x ELPA releases,
>> but does not have tags like on master branch for the releases
>> announced on auctex-announces.
>>
>> If it is not too much inconvenient would you consider add
Arash Esbati writes:
> Jeremy Bryant writes:
>
>> Hi, reftex.el in Emacs core is listed as having maintainer:
>> auctex-devel@gnu.org
>>
>> I have been working on a checkdoc patch for reftex, presumably this will
>> be reviewed here?
>
> I think i
Hi, reftex.el in Emacs core is listed as having maintainer:
auctex-devel@gnu.org
I have been working on a checkdoc patch for reftex, presumably this will
be reviewed here?
Or submitted as a patch to bug-gnu-emacs including auctex-devel?
What will be the commit mechanism?
Thanks for any info.
16 matches
Mail list logo
