Re: FriendlyARM SBCs

2016-06-29 Thread valerij cotinskij
OpenBSD requires UEFI to boot? cool. I am in the process of creating UEFI implementation for armv7 (bbb, cubieboard 2). when it will come to writing an OS loader for a UEFI aware OS, I would be glad to chose as a target OS, - OpenBSD instead of linux. xD 2016-06-29 7:44 GMT+03:00, Jonathan Gray :

Re: FriendlyARM SBCs

2016-06-29 Thread Artturi Alm
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:44:29PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:21:39AM +, Karl Hammerschmidt wrote: > > Is anyone else interested in their boards? > > > > They were very willing to provide extra documentation when asked, > > including a schematic for one of their L

Re: FriendlyARM SBCs

2016-06-29 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:39:47PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:44:29PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:21:39AM +, Karl Hammerschmidt wrote: > > > Is anyone else interested in their boards? > > > > > > They were very willing to provide extra

Killer board

2016-06-29 Thread John McGuigan
Hi folks, The discussion regarding the FriendlyARM SBCs and the focus on the CuBox-i4Pro got me thinking about my ideal arm board. Personally, I think a small ARM SBC would be perfect as a home router if it has 2 (or more) Ethernet ports -- preferably gigabit, fanless, serial console (FTDI), etc.

Re: Killer board

2016-06-29 Thread Patrick Wildt
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:46:57PM -0600, John McGuigan wrote: > Hi folks, > > The discussion regarding the FriendlyARM SBCs and the focus on the > CuBox-i4Pro got me thinking about my ideal arm board. Personally, I think a > small ARM SBC would be perfect as a home router if it has 2 (or more) >

Re: FriendlyARM SBCs

2016-06-29 Thread Karl Hammerschmidt
Thanks. On 6/29/16, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:21:39AM +, Karl Hammerschmidt wrote: >> Is anyone else interested in their boards? >> >> They were very willing to provide extra documentation when asked, >> including a schematic for one of their LCD drivers and an unpubli

Re: FriendlyARM SBCs

2016-06-29 Thread Artturi Alm
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 07:53:08PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:39:47PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:44:29PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:21:39AM +, Karl Hammerschmidt wrote: > > > > Is anyo

Re: FriendlyARM SBCs

2016-06-29 Thread Daniel Bolgheroni
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:21:39AM +, Karl Hammerschmidt wrote: > Is anyone else interested in their boards? For those who are always looking for SBCs to build routers, Banana Pi R1 is cheap and easily available: http://www.banana-pi.org/r1.html However, it is also based on Allwinner A20. As

Re: FriendlyARM SBCs

2016-06-29 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:39:47PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:44:29PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:21:39AM +, Karl Hammerschmidt wrote: > > > Is anyone else interested in their boards? > > > > > > They were very willing to provide extra

Re: FriendlyARM SBCs

2016-06-29 Thread Artturi Alm
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 03:21:18PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:39:47PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:44:29PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:21:39AM +, Karl Hammerschmidt wrote: > > > > Is anyone else intereste

Re: FriendlyARM SBCs

2016-06-29 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 08:38:03AM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 03:21:18PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:39:47PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:44:29PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:21:3