On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 07:53:08PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:39:47PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:44:29PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:21:39AM +0000, Karl Hammerschmidt wrote:
> > > > Is anyone else interested in their boards?
> > > > 
> > > > They were very willing to provide extra documentation when asked,
> > > > including a schematic for one of their LCD drivers and an unpublished
> > > > datasheet for the AXP228 PMIC used on some of their boards. They also
> > > > offered free boards to the FreeBSD guys several months ago, but there
> > > > were no replies.
> > > > 
> > > > It would be a different SoC, though (Allwinner H3, Samsung 4412, 4418,
> > > > 6818). On a positive note, I haven't found any mention yet of closed
> > > > binaries like the ODRIOD C1. (Doesn't mean there aren't any, and I'm
> > > > still looking...)
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > The focus is on the cubox i4pro and to a lesser extent the beaglebone
> > > black.  Boards that aren't included in the main u-boot repository
> > > are unlikely to support the bootloader which requires efi.
> > > 
> > 
> > Wondering about how i should interpret that; i got yet another board with 
> > SoC
> > by Allwinner/sunxi(Pine64+) waiting at the post office for pickup, that i 
> > had
> > already began writing the support for(CortexA53) into armv7. Wasted effort?
> 
> No, but probably they want to focus their efforts on something more
> generic like the toolchain instead of specific boards. ARMv7 really
> needs hardfp, anything with crypto involved is quite slow.
> 

probably so.

> If you want work with Allwinner CPUs, the pmap could use an update from
> NetBSD. The support for A20 is broken, maybe other newer CPUs will have
> similar problems.
> 

imo there's enough difference, that just fixing/cleaning current pmap
should be easier than 'updating'.
And yes, I'm aware, and i made the (CortexA53) remark on purpose, had i not
noticed just a few hours before writing the mail that my pine64 had just
arrived, i would of have written the mail about wasting effort on fixes
beyond what is rotting on arm@ already for CortexA7, the predecessor of A53
instead..

-Artturi

> -- 
> Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
> 

Reply via email to