Re: Review Request: SoK Unit test : core/collections/Collection

2012-06-21 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
> On June 21, 2012, 2:08 p.m., Matěj Laitl wrote: > > tests/core/collections/TestCollection.cpp, line 34 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105166/diff/2/?file=70025#file70025line34> > > > > Strange indentation again. Hmm? > > Jasneet Bhatti

Re: Review Request: SoK Unit test : core/collections/Collection

2012-06-21 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
sses on my repository Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK Unit test : core/collections/Collection

2012-06-21 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
/r/105166/diff/ Testing --- Test passes on my repository Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK Unit test : core/collections/Collection

2012-06-22 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
--- Test passes on my repository Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/QueryMaker

2012-06-23 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
tests/core/collections/TestQueryMaker.cpp PRE-CREATION Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105172/diff/ Testing --- Able to build Amarok after writing the test Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://ma

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/QueryMaker

2012-06-23 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
tests/core/collections/MockQueryMaker.cpp PRE-CREATION tests/core/collections/TestQueryMaker.h PRE-CREATION tests/core/collections/TestQueryMaker.cpp PRE-CREATION Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105172/diff/ Testing (updated) --- Test builds and runs fine Thanks, Jasneet

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/QueryMaker

2012-06-23 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
tests/core/collections/MockQueryMaker.cpp PRE-CREATION tests/core/collections/TestQueryMaker.h PRE-CREATION tests/core/collections/TestQueryMaker.cpp PRE-CREATION Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105172/diff/ Testing --- Test builds and runs fine Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/QueryMaker

2012-06-26 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
lly generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105172/#review15160 ------- On June 23, 2012, 7:05 p.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail.

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/QueryMaker

2012-06-26 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
/diff/ Testing --- Test builds and runs fine Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/QueryMaker

2012-06-26 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
and runs fine Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/support/TrackForUrlWorker

2012-06-29 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
--- Builds and runs fine. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/MetaConstants

2012-07-03 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
E-CREATION tests/core/meta/support/TestMetaConstants.cpp PRE-CREATION tests/mocks/MetaMock.h b478c87 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105424/diff/ Testing --- Builds and runs fine. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing l

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/support/TrackForUrlWorker

2012-07-04 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105389/diff/ Testing --- Builds and runs fine. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/support/TrackForUrlWorker

2012-07-04 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
-- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105389/#review15334 --- On July 5, 2012, 12:07 a.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > ---

Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/MetaKeys( TrackKey )

2012-07-05 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
-CREATION Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105454/diff/ Testing --- Builds, and runs fine Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/support/TrackForUrlWorker

2012-07-06 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
/ Testing --- Builds and runs fine. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/support/TrackForUrlWorker

2012-07-06 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
---------- On July 6, 2012, 8:54 a.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105389/ >

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/support/TrackForUrlWorker

2012-07-06 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/support/TrackForUrlWorker

2012-07-06 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
--------- On July 6, 2012, 5:38 p.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105389/ >

Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/MetaKeys( AlbumKey )

2012-07-09 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105497/diff/ Testing --- Builds, links and runs fine. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/MetaKeys( TrackKey )

2012-07-09 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
/meta/support/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION tests/core/meta/support/TestMetaTrackKey.h PRE-CREATION tests/core/meta/support/TestMetaTrackKey.cpp PRE-CREATION Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105454/diff/ Testing --- Builds, and runs fine Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/support/TrackForUrlWorker

2012-07-11 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
-CREATION Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105389/diff/ Testing --- Builds and runs fine. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/support/TrackForUrlWorker

2012-07-11 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
r ***** Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/MetaKeys( AlbumKey )

2012-07-11 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
eet/amarok/tests/core/meta/support/TestMetaAlbumKey.cpp(104)] PASS : TestMetaAlbumKey::testOperatorLessThan() INFO : TestMetaAlbumKey::cleanupTestCase() entering PASS : TestMetaAlbumKey::cleanupTestCase() Totals: 4 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped * Finished testing of TestMetaAlbumKey *

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/MetaKeys( TrackKey )

2012-07-11 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
testing of TestMetaTrackKey * Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/PrivateMetaRegistry

2012-07-12 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
* Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/MetaKeys( TrackKey )

2012-07-13 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
: TestMetaTrackKey::cleanupTestCase() entering PASS : TestMetaTrackKey::cleanupTestCase() Totals: 3 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped * Finished testing of TestMetaTrackKey * Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/MetaKeys( AlbumKey )

2012-07-13 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
sed, 0 failed, 0 skipped * Finished testing of TestMetaAlbumKey * Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/MetaKeys( AlbumKey )

2012-07-13 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
-- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105497/#review15794 ------- On July 14, 2012, 6:03 a.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > -

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/MetaKeys( TrackKey )

2012-07-20 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105454/#review16093 ------- On July 14, 2012, 4:06 a.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-m

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/MetaKeys( AlbumKey )

2012-07-20 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105497/#review16091 --- On July 14, 2012, 6:03 a.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/PrivateMetaRegistry

2012-07-20 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
::cleanupTestCase() Totals: 8 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped * Finished testing of TestPrivateMetaRegistry * Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/MetaUtility

2012-07-20 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
--- Builds and runs fine. Just the image setting problem exists. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/PrivateMetaRegistry

2012-07-24 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
, 0 failed, 0 skipped * Finished testing of TestPrivateMetaRegistry * Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/support/PrivateMetaRegistry

2012-07-24 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
t: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105525/#review16229 ------- On July 24, 2012, 4:32 p.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-

Re: Review Request 109470: A patch which allows us to distinguish between cached lyrics and lyrics newly downloaded from the internet.

2013-03-14 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
/lyrics/LyricsEngine.cpp <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109470/#comment21854> Indentation issue. src/context/engines/lyrics/LyricsEngine.cpp <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109470/#comment21855> Spaces needed between brackets and function arguments. src/context/engines/lyrics

Re: Review Request 110426: KWalletHelper class for services using the KWallet

2013-05-14 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
ttp://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110426/#comment24195> The problem seems to be here. There's MagnatuneConfig.cpp here too. So you'll probably have to add KWalletHelper.cpp to this list as well to link it properly. - Jasneet Bhatti On May 14, 2013, 6:13 p.m., Vedan

Re: Review Request 110426: KWalletHelper class for services using the KWallet

2013-05-14 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
> On May 14, 2013, 6:43 p.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > src/services/magnatune/CMakeLists.txt, line 19 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110426/diff/1/?file=143704#file143704line19> > > > > The problem seems to be here. > > > > Th

Review Request: Bug 173814 - JJ: add keyboard shortcut for "Edit Track Information..."

2012-02-12 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
ylist/PlaylistDock.h 897be1d src/playlist/PlaylistDock.cpp b217e3c Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103960/diff/ Testing --- I've tested this on ubuntu 11.10 with kubuntu-desktop and it seems to work fine. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti

Re: Review Request: Bug 173814 - JJ: add keyboard shortcut for "Edit Track Information..."

2012-02-13 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
-- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103960/#review10581 --- On Feb. 13, 2012, 5:26 a.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > --

Re: Review Request: Bug 173814 - JJ: add keyboard shortcut for "Edit Track Information..."

2012-02-13 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
d it seems to work fine. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: Bug 173814 - JJ: add keyboard shortcut for "Edit Track Information..."

2012-02-14 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
> On Feb. 13, 2012, 8:40 a.m., Matěj Laitl wrote: > > src/playlist/PlaylistDock.cpp, line 327 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103960/diff/1/?file=49412#file49412line327> > > > > Is there any specific reason this call is here? > > Jasneet Bhatti

Re: Review Request: Bug 173814 - JJ: add keyboard shortcut for "Edit Track Information..."

2012-02-14 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
th kubuntu-desktop and it seems to work fine. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: Bug 173814 - JJ: add keyboard shortcut for "Edit Track Information..."

2012-02-15 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
sted this on ubuntu 11.10 with kubuntu-desktop and it seems to work fine. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: Bug 173814 - JJ: add keyboard shortcut for "Edit Track Information..."

2012-02-15 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
ommunity. On to the next one. - Jasneet --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103960/#review10650 ------- On

Review Request: Implemented Bug 214721 - Enable bookmark marker to be moved

2012-03-16 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
Works fine for me. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: Implemented Bug 214721 - Enable bookmark marker to be moved

2012-03-18 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
Tested it on ubuntu 11.04 with kubuntu-desktop. Works fine for me. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

GSoC : Implement MediaArtStorageSpec

2012-03-18 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
I'm interested in working on "Project: Implement MediaArtStorageSpec" as a GSoC project. I've read the information on the links provided on the page https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296049 . What more do I need to study and how should I go about working on this ? ___

Re: GSoC : Implement MediaArtStorageSpec

2012-03-19 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Teo Mrnjavac wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 18:46, Jasneet Bhatti > wrote: > > I'm interested in working on "Project: Implement MediaArtStorageSpec" as > a > > GSoC project. I've read the information on the links prov

Re: Review Request: Implemented Bug 214721 - Enable bookmark marker to be moved

2012-03-23 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
t.cpp 5e72e13 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104307/diff/ Testing --- Tested it on ubuntu 11.04 with kubuntu-desktop. Works fine for me. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/ma

Re: Review Request: Implemented Bug 214721 - Enable bookmark marker to be moved

2012-03-24 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
an opportunity to remove these, too) I don't completely understand the concept of DEBUG_BLOCKs. So I tried to structure the function like other similar functions. How do you determine that we are not debugging a piece of code, because there is debug() to output the messages ? A

Re: Review Request: Implemented Bug 214721 - Enable bookmark marker to be moved

2012-03-24 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
t.cpp 5e72e13 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104307/diff/ Testing --- Tested it on ubuntu 11.04 with kubuntu-desktop. Works fine for me. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/ma

Re: Review Request: Implemented Bug 214721 - Enable bookmark marker to be moved

2012-03-24 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
src/widgets/BookmarkTriangle.cpp 4c59d42 src/widgets/SliderWidget.cpp 5e72e13 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104307/diff/ Testing --- Tested it on ubuntu 11.04 with kubuntu-desktop. Works fine for me. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ A

Re: Review Request: Implemented Bug 214721 - Enable bookmark marker to be moved

2012-03-24 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
t > > actually debugging. (I know, it is in other methods here, you can take this > > as an opportunity to remove these, too) > > Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > I don't completely understand the concept of DEBUG_BLOCKs. So I tried to > structure the function li

Re: Review Request: Implemented Bug 214721 - Enable bookmark marker to be moved

2012-03-24 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
s/BookmarkTriangle.cpp, line 135 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104307/diff/2/?file=54412#file54412line135> > > > > Minor things: trailing whitespace, excessive debugging. Taken care of. And finally, I apologize for the silly mistakes I made. I should have been m

Re: Review Request: Implemented Bug 214721 - Enable bookmark marker to be moved

2012-03-25 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
ically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104307/#review11839 ------- On March 24, 2012, 12:03 p.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > --- >

Re: Review Request: Implemented Bug 214721 - Enable bookmark marker to be moved

2012-03-25 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
e swtich); I've > > tried to upload updated patch here twice so that you can see the changes, > > but it somehow doesn't show. > > > > Anyways, thanks and I'd be glad to commit more your review requests, > > Jasneet, pick any little bug that a

GSoC 2012 Proof Of Concept : Amarok Unit Testing - Sample test

2012-04-21 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
I have been extremely busy with university exam preparations for the past few days, so haven't been as active here as I've been before. But I've written a sample test to demonstrate my test writing skills. P.S. : This is just a sample test, so I've not put it up on the kde reviewboard Regards Jas

Review Request: Unit test : ActionsCapability

2012-06-03 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105144/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: Unit test : ActionsCapability

2012-06-04 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
-- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105144/#review14402 --- On June 3, 2012, 3:45 p.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > --

Re: Review Request: Unit test : ActionsCapability

2012-06-04 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
/TestActionsCapability.cpp e69de29 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105144/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: Unit test : ActionsCapability

2012-06-05 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
105144/#review14420 --- On June 4, 2012, 10:53 a.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://g

Review Request: Unit testing : core/collections/Collection

2012-06-07 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
2efd1fe tests/core/collections/TestCollection.h PRE-CREATION tests/core/collections/TestCollection.cpp PRE-CREATION Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105166/diff/ Testing --- Test passes on my repository Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti

Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/QueryMaker

2012-06-07 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
rewritten in the future Diffs - tests/core/collections/TestQueryMaker.h PRE-CREATION tests/core/collections/TestQueryMaker.cpp PRE-CREATION Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105172/diff/ Testing --- Able to build Amarok after writing the test Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti

Re: Review Request: SoK Unit test : core/collections/Collection

2012-06-07 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
-CREATION Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105166/diff/ Testing --- Test passes on my repository Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit test : core/capabilities/ActionsCapability

2012-06-07 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
--- Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/collections/QueryMaker

2012-06-07 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105172/diff/ Testing --- Able to build Amarok after writing the test Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/Meta (MetaCapability)

2012-06-18 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
/ Testing --- Unit Test builds and runs as desired Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit test : core/capabilities/ActionsCapability

2012-06-18 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
/capabilities/CMakeLists.txt e69de29 tests/core/capabilities/TestActionsCapability.h e69de29 tests/core/capabilities/TestActionsCapability.cpp e69de29 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105144/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/Meta (MetaCapability)

2012-06-19 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
tests/core/meta/TestMetaCapability.cpp PRE-CREATION Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105291/diff/ Testing --- Unit Test builds and runs as desired Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit Test : core/meta/Meta (MetaCapability)

2012-06-19 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
ably because cmake sometimes doesn't detect changes to cmake files and the older version had several more link targets including this one. - Jasneet --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit test : core/capabilities/ActionsCapability

2012-06-19 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
tests/core/capabilities/TestActionsCapability.h PRE-CREATION tests/core/capabilities/TestActionsCapability.cpp PRE-CREATION Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105144/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list

Review Request: SoK - Unit test : core/playlists/PlaylistFormat

2012-06-20 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105306/diff/ Testing --- Compiles, links and runs fine. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit test : core/playlists/PlaylistFormat

2012-06-20 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION tests/core/playlists/TestPlaylistFormat.h PRE-CREATION tests/core/playlists/TestPlaylistFormat.cpp PRE-CREATION Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105306/diff/ Testing --- Compiles, links and runs fine. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit test : core/playlists/PlaylistFormat

2012-06-20 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
ply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105306/#review14910 ------- On June 20, 2012, 2:05 p.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To re

Re: Review Request: SoK - Unit test : core/playlists/PlaylistFormat

2012-06-20 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
/playlists/TestPlaylistFormat.h PRE-CREATION tests/core/playlists/TestPlaylistFormat.cpp PRE-CREATION Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105306/diff/ Testing --- Compiles, links and runs fine. Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing

Re: Review Request: SoK Unit test : core/collections/Collection

2012-06-21 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
repository Thanks, Jasneet Bhatti ___ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Re: Review Request: SoK Unit test : core/collections/Collection

2012-06-21 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
/core/collections/TestCollection.cpp, line 237 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105166/diff/2/?file=70025#file70025line237> > > > > Same as comment for testIsWritable() Working on it now. - Jasneet --- This is a

Re: Review Request: SoK Unit test : core/collections/Collection

2012-06-21 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
just dont > > QCOMPARE( collection->usedCapacity(), 0.0 )? You really want to pretend > > static_cast doesn't exist and use it only in at a least resort. > > Jasneet Bhatti wrote: > 0.0 is a double and usedCapacity returns a float, so there was a warning > on c

Re: Review Request: SoK Unit test : core/collections/Collection

2012-06-21 Thread Jasneet Bhatti
> On June 21, 2012, 2:08 p.m., Matěj Laitl wrote: > > tests/core/collections/TestCollection.cpp, line 34 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105166/diff/2/?file=70025#file70025line34> > > > > Strange indentation again. Hmm? > > Jasneet Bhatti