Bug in rc4 utils (was: Re: [Alsa-user] rc4 libs won't compile)

2002-10-23 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Takashi Iwai wrote: please try to "configure --with-versioned=no". which libtool version are you using? please check the output of "libtool --version". As I said in my last email, the above worked. But I found a small bug in the utils tarball. Namely 'missing' 'mkinstalldirs' and 'install-sh

Re: [Alsa-user] rc4 libs won't compile

2002-10-23 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Takashi Iwai wrote: please try to "configure --with-versioned=no". That works! Thanks. which libtool version are you using? please check the output of "libtool --version". Actually, I didn't even have libtool installed (relatively new box, oops, my bad), but after installing it, I still cou

Re: [Alsa-user] rc4 libs won't compile

2002-10-23 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 15:55, Steven Rubenstein wrote: > Read the INSTALL file in alsa-lib. > > SJR I did that... The only thing it states is a bug in libtool when trying to compile static and shared at the same time. Since I'm using default configure options, only shared are build. So this has no

Re: [Alsa-user] rc4 libs won't compile

2002-10-23 Thread Takashi Iwai
At 23 Oct 2002 14:04:46 +0200, Mathy Vanvoorden wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 13:33, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > i believe it's not a bug of "ld" but of "libtool". > > could you check "libtool --version" ? > > > I have exactly the same problem, the libtool (that is included in the > package, so

Re: [Alsa-user] rc4 libs won't compile

2002-10-23 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 14:04, Mathy Vanvoorden wrote: Ignore last mail :-) Apparantly make still used the provided libtool. I replaced it with the libtool I installed (since I can't see a configure-option to specify that it should use the installed version and configure doesn't detect it either???)

Re: [Alsa-user] rc4 libs won't compile

2002-10-23 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 13:33, Takashi Iwai wrote: > i believe it's not a bug of "ld" but of "libtool". > could you check "libtool --version" ? > I have exactly the same problem, the libtool (that is included in the package, so why can't you check for yourself? :-) is version: ltmain.sh (GNU libto

Re: [Alsa-user] rc4 libs won't compile

2002-10-23 Thread Matthias Saou
Once upon a time, Takashi wrote : > > I'm getting the exact same problem on Red Hat Linux 8.0 with "GNU ld > > version 2.13.90.0.2 20020802". Is the "--with-versioned=no" workaround > > considered a clean enough one? Should I wait for a patch to the > > configure script instead? > > i believe it'

Re: [Alsa-user] rc4 libs won't compile

2002-10-23 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:04:39 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote: > > Once upon a time, Takashi wrote : > > > > /usr/bin/ld: .libs/libasound.so.2.0.0: undefined versioned symbol name > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > /usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Bad value > > > > please try to "configur

Re: [Alsa-user] rc4 libs won't compile

2002-10-23 Thread Matthias Saou
Once upon a time, Takashi wrote : > > /usr/bin/ld: .libs/libasound.so.2.0.0: undefined versioned symbol name > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > /usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Bad value > > please try to "configure --with-versioned=no". > > which libtool version are you using? > please

Re: [Alsa-user] rc4 libs won't compile

2002-10-23 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:30:20 -0700, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > > Hey all, > I'm trying to upgrade from 0.9.0rc3 to 0.9.0rc4... The drivers compile > fine, but the libs don't. During make it dies with: > > gcc -shared conf.lo confmisc.lo input.lo output.lo async.lo error.lo > dlmisc.lo -Wl,--whole-

[Alsa-user] rc4 libs won't compile

2002-10-22 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Hey all, I'm trying to upgrade from 0.9.0rc3 to 0.9.0rc4... The drivers compile fine, but the libs don't. During make it dies with: gcc -shared conf.lo confmisc.lo input.lo output.lo async.lo error.lo dlmisc.lo -Wl,--whole-archive control/.libs/libcontrol.al mixer/.libs/libmixer.al pcm/.libs/l