llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-0` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/14879
Here is the releva
@@ -11714,13 +11714,37 @@ static void DiagnoseBadDeduction(Sema &S, NamedDecl
*Found, Decl *Templated,
return;
}
- case TemplateDeductionResult::InvalidExplicitArguments:
+ case TemplateDeductionResult::InvalidExplicitArguments: {
assert(ParamD && "no parameter f
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Anshil Gandhi (gandhi56)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124983.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (added) clang/test/CodeGenCUDA/increment-index-for-thunks.cu (+33)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/test/Code
https://github.com/aeubanks updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124834
>From 7c40169ec7430ec64aaeb053e423eca1ceff7f0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Eubanks
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 20:36:58 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][X86] Support
__attribute__((model("small"/"large"
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -verify=expected,riscv64 -fsyntax-only %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64 -verify=expected,x86_64 -fsyntax-only %s
aeubanks wrote:
does the change to this test make sense, or am I missing something that putti
https://github.com/gandhi56 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124983
None
>From 0e2317ae0ef1377bc461e7e461bf3b699d75014d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anshil Gandhi
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 18:04:44 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [CUDA] Precommit test for VTable codegen
---
.../CodeGe
@@ -11714,13 +11714,37 @@ static void DiagnoseBadDeduction(Sema &S, NamedDecl
*Found, Decl *Templated,
return;
}
- case TemplateDeductionResult::InvalidExplicitArguments:
+ case TemplateDeductionResult::InvalidExplicitArguments: {
assert(ParamD && "no parameter f
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121417
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jason Rice
Date: 2025-01-29T21:43:52+01:00
New Revision: abc8812df02599fc413d9ed77b992f8236ed2af9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/abc8812df02599fc413d9ed77b992f8236ed2af9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/abc8812df02599fc413d9ed77b992f8236ed2af9.diff
LO
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Narayan (vortex73)
Changes
- [x] Fix crash on Clang's Assertion Trunk due to Virtual Copy Constructor
Fixed #112909
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124819.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaD
https://github.com/vortex73 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124819
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vortex73 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124819
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2949,6 +2950,13 @@ static void handleSectionAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const
ParsedAttr &AL) {
}
}
+static bool isValidCodeModelAttr(Sema &S, StringRef Str) {
+ bool IsX8664Target =
+ S.Context.getTargetInfo().getTriple().getArch() == llvm::Triple::x86_64;
+ bool IsX
https://github.com/broxigarchen edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119750
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/broxigarchen edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119750
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112241
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Matheus Izvekov
Date: 2025-01-29T17:23:36-03:00
New Revision: 07a0e2be86f33beb6d519a3d466b95c2257e93cb
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/07a0e2be86f33beb6d519a3d466b95c2257e93cb
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/07a0e2be86f33beb6d519a3d466b95c2257e93cb.dif
https://github.com/QuietMisdreavus closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120801
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/12682
Here is the r
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-arm-ubuntu` running
on `linaro-lldb-arm-ubuntu` while building `clang` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/18/builds/10661
Here is the relevant piece of the build lo
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122754
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -11714,13 +11714,37 @@ static void DiagnoseBadDeduction(Sema &S, NamedDecl
*Found, Decl *Templated,
return;
}
- case TemplateDeductionResult::InvalidExplicitArguments:
+ case TemplateDeductionResult::InvalidExplicitArguments: {
assert(ParamD && "no parameter f
Author: QuietMisdreavus
Date: 2025-01-29T13:03:33-07:00
New Revision: a368402d633098fc211c29f9726eef6e1874da5f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a368402d633098fc211c29f9726eef6e1874da5f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a368402d633098fc211c29f9726eef6e1874da5f.dif
https://github.com/mizvekov closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111894
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Matheus Izvekov
Date: 2025-01-29T16:57:05-03:00
New Revision: 8a334af417ff2ef49e0bc74f9421b4f3aa479805
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8a334af417ff2ef49e0bc74f9421b4f3aa479805
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8a334af417ff2ef49e0bc74f9421b4f3aa479805.dif
bwendling wrote:
Friendly ping for any further comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122198
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -verify=expected,riscv64 -fsyntax-only %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64 -verify=expected,x86_64 -fsyntax-only %s
Artem-B wrote:
nvptx does not *use* the code models, but CUDA compilation will *see* those
a
https://github.com/DKLoehr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117622
>From 798b3f21593499194487c9877b8f4a3d9e44bb6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Devon Loehr
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 19:29:00 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Warn when unique objects might be duplicated in shared
librar
@@ -11714,13 +11714,37 @@ static void DiagnoseBadDeduction(Sema &S, NamedDecl
*Found, Decl *Templated,
return;
}
- case TemplateDeductionResult::InvalidExplicitArguments:
+ case TemplateDeductionResult::InvalidExplicitArguments: {
assert(ParamD && "no parameter f
https://github.com/aeubanks updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124834
>From 7c40169ec7430ec64aaeb053e423eca1ceff7f0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Eubanks
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 20:36:58 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][X86] Support
__attribute__((model("small"/"large"
@@ -11714,13 +11714,38 @@ static void DiagnoseBadDeduction(Sema &S, NamedDecl
*Found, Decl *Templated,
return;
}
- case TemplateDeductionResult::InvalidExplicitArguments:
+ case TemplateDeductionResult::InvalidExplicitArguments: {
assert(ParamD && "no parameter f
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -verify=expected,riscv64 -fsyntax-only %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64 -verify=expected,x86_64 -fsyntax-only %s
aeubanks wrote:
I thought nvptx64 was the GPU-side of things, the GPU side is also using code
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM. Lets try to follow up w/ something on the llvm side too though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124824
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/vtjnash updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122330
>From 829e1c89ce869f782cb802a1d618003770c0d074 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jameson Nash
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:10:08 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Sema] do not destruct fields of unions
The C++ standard proh
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124750
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+/**
+ * When building shared libraries, hidden objects which are defined in header
+ * files will be duplicated, with one copy in each shared library. If the
object
+ * was meant to be globally unique (one copy per program), this can cause very
+ * subtle bugs.
https://github.com/DKLoehr edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117622
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AidanGoldfarb updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122754
>From b6c576fb90362640b2fd4e41bd7f13dfee95d04d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aidan
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:53:39 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 01/23] initial template arg fix push
---
.../clang/Basic/Diagnost
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+/**
+ * When building shared libraries, hidden objects which are defined in header
+ * files will be duplicated, with one copy in each shared library. If the
object
+ * was meant to be globally unique (one copy per program), this can cause very
+ * subtle bugs.
@@ -6153,6 +6153,15 @@ def warn_static_local_in_extern_inline : Warning<
def note_convert_inline_to_static : Note<
"use 'static' to give inline function %0 internal linkage">;
+def warn_possible_object_duplication_mutable : Warning<
+ "%0 is mutable, has hidden visibility,
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+/**
+ * When building shared libraries, hidden objects which are defined in header
+ * files will be duplicated, with one copy in each shared library. If the
object
+ * was meant to be globally unique (one copy per program), this can cause very
+ * subtle bugs.
@@ -1144,6 +1144,12 @@ Arm and AArch64 Support
* FUJITSU-MONAKA (fujitsu-monaka)
+- The AArch64 calling convention for empty structs in C++ mode was changed to
+ pass them as if they have a size of 1 byte, matching the AAPCS64
+ specification and GCC's implementation. The
@@ -13374,6 +13374,62 @@ void Sema::checkNonTrivialCUnion(QualType QT,
SourceLocation Loc,
.visit(QT, nullptr, false);
}
+bool Sema::GloballyUniqueObjectMightBeAccidentallyDuplicated(
+const VarDecl *Dcl) {
+ if (!Dcl || !getLangOpts().CPlusPlus)
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+/**
+ * When building shared libraries, hidden objects which are defined in header
+ * files will be duplicated, with one copy in each shared library. If the
object
+ * was meant to be globally unique (one copy per program), this can cause very
+ * subtle bugs.
https://github.com/thurstond updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124857
>From 68246540d28c765af1fe4d61244e35cc8ff723cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thurston Dang
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 18:59:07 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [ubsan] Connect -fsanitize-skip-hot-cutoff to
LowerAllowC
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112241
>From c1f3c40382b79a3aa3fb422b6f7382a1f7d7c6f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:28:58 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Track function template instantiation from definition
@@ -9712,19 +9712,34 @@ def warn_operator_new_returns_null : Warning<
"%select{| or 'noexcept'}1">, InGroup;
def err_operator_new_dependent_param_type : Error<
- "%0 cannot take a dependent type as first parameter; "
- "use size_t (%1) instead">;
+ "%select{|type aware}1
cor3ntin wrote:
> > Does this mean we should adjust the cxx_status page to not say Clang 20? I
> > also see there is a conflict with the ReleaseNotes.md where it appears all
> > of the C++2c items no longer exist. (I guess that is because it is for the
> > next release.)
>
> Meh, let's assume
erichkeane wrote:
I don't have a great solution for this unfortuantely, but `HasRebuiltInit`
doesn't seem right to me, it looks like we're just trying to smuggle a bit
around for a few . First, it doesn't seem clear to me why the 'rebuilt-ness'
of an initializer should have anything to do wit
https://github.com/broxigarchen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119750
>From 68ba9f46992b683dcff947e929e5050691acf0f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: guochen2
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:33:14 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] True16 for v_alignbyte_b32 in MC
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/CGB
ricejasonf wrote:
>@ricejasonf let us know if you want us to merge on your behalf
@cor3ntin When you think its ready, yes please. I think it requires write
access. I fixed the conflict in the ReleaseNotes through Github's UI so that
only my feature is under the C++2c features added. I assume o
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff a080498c92e4c00f099dab1a3d5dac48f14b7492
9a3ff427202d1e4cf089732c73d07c2fc90d83da --e
cor3ntin wrote:
> Does this mean we should adjust the cxx_status page to not say Clang 20? I
> also see there is a conflict with the ReleaseNotes.md where it appears all of
> the C++2c items no longer exist. (I guess that is because it is for the next
> release.)
Meh, let's assume 20 and we c
@@ -795,12 +795,29 @@ static void addSanitizers(const Triple &TargetTriple,
PB.registerOptimizerLastEPCallback(SanitizersCallback);
}
- if (LowerAllowCheckPass::IsRequested()) {
+ bool lowerAllowCheck = LowerAllowCheckPass::IsRequested();
+ // Is there a non-zero cuto
@@ -3614,29 +3614,35 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitCheck(
llvm::Value *RecoverableCond = nullptr;
llvm::Value *TrapCond = nullptr;
bool NoMerge = false;
+ // Expand checks into:
+ // (Check1 || !allow_ubsan_check) && (Check2 || !allow_ubsan_check) ...
+ // We need sep
@@ -3614,29 +3614,35 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitCheck(
llvm::Value *RecoverableCond = nullptr;
llvm::Value *TrapCond = nullptr;
bool NoMerge = false;
+ // Expand checks into:
+ // (Check1 || !allow_ubsan_check) && (Check2 || !allow_ubsan_check) ...
+ // We need sep
@@ -795,12 +795,29 @@ static void addSanitizers(const Triple &TargetTriple,
PB.registerOptimizerLastEPCallback(SanitizersCallback);
}
- if (LowerAllowCheckPass::IsRequested()) {
+ bool lowerAllowCheck = LowerAllowCheckPass::IsRequested();
+ // Is there a non-zero cuto
@@ -795,12 +795,29 @@ static void addSanitizers(const Triple &TargetTriple,
PB.registerOptimizerLastEPCallback(SanitizersCallback);
}
- if (LowerAllowCheckPass::IsRequested()) {
+ bool lowerAllowCheck = LowerAllowCheckPass::IsRequested();
+ // Is there a non-zero cuto
@@ -795,12 +795,29 @@ static void addSanitizers(const Triple &TargetTriple,
PB.registerOptimizerLastEPCallback(SanitizersCallback);
}
- if (LowerAllowCheckPass::IsRequested()) {
+ bool lowerAllowCheck = LowerAllowCheckPass::IsRequested();
+ // Is there a non-zero cuto
https://github.com/thurstond updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124857
>From 68246540d28c765af1fe4d61244e35cc8ff723cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thurston Dang
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 18:59:07 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [ubsan] Connect -fsanitize-skip-hot-cutoff to
LowerAllowC
ricejasonf wrote:
@cor3ntin
> Now that the Clang 20 branch has happened, I think we should go ahead with
> that PR
Does this mean we should adjust the cxx_status page to not say Clang 20? I also
see there is a conflict with the ReleaseNotes.md where it appears all of the
C++2c items no long
https://github.com/Prabhuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124824
>From 270c260ba8160c71c6602fcb91a635368ee09a88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Prabhu Karthikeyan Rajasekaran
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 19:07:06 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [clang] Abort on unsupported uefi triples.
https://github.com/gandhi56 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124687
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124964
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,13 +1,15 @@
// Check CUID generated by hash.
// The same CUID is generated for the same file with the same options.
+// RUN: cd %S
+
// RUN: %clang -### -x hip --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--no-offload-new-driver \
// RUN: --offload-arch=gfx906 -c -nogpuinc -no
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Momchil Velikov (momchil-velikov)
Changes
Fixes #124907
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124968.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp (+5)
- (added) clang/test/CodeGenCXX/aarch64
https://github.com/momchil-velikov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124968
Fixes #124907
>From e490f9684aa8784299a9195a195433270f2cec79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Momchil Velikov
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 18:31:18 +
Subject: [PATCH] [AArch64] Add MSVC mangling for the __
@@ -3661,6 +3661,12 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
NonTrivialCUnionContext UseContext,
unsigned NonTrivialKind);
+ /// Certain globally-unique variables might be accidentally duplicated if
+ /// built into mu
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jan Voung (jvoung)
Changes
Check the canonical type in the matchers to handle aliases.
For example std::optional uses add_pointer_t<...>.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124964.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modifie
https://github.com/jvoung ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124964
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Prabhuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124824
>From 270c260ba8160c71c6602fcb91a635368ee09a88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Prabhu Karthikeyan Rajasekaran
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 19:07:06 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang] Abort on unsupported uefi triples.
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+/**
+ * When building shared libraries, hidden objects which are defined in header
+ * files will be duplicated, with one copy in each shared library. If the
object
+ * was meant to be globally unique (one copy per program), this can cause very
+ * subtle bugs.
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+/**
+ * When building shared libraries, hidden objects which are defined in header
+ * files will be duplicated, with one copy in each shared library. If the
object
+ * was meant to be globally unique (one copy per program), this can cause very
+ * subtle bugs.
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+/**
+ * When building shared libraries, hidden objects which are defined in header
+ * files will be duplicated, with one copy in each shared library. If the
object
+ * was meant to be globally unique (one copy per program), this can cause very
+ * subtle bugs.
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+/**
+ * When building shared libraries, hidden objects which are defined in header
+ * files will be duplicated, with one copy in each shared library. If the
object
+ * was meant to be globally unique (one copy per program), this can cause very
+ * subtle bugs.
@@ -6153,6 +6153,15 @@ def warn_static_local_in_extern_inline : Warning<
def note_convert_inline_to_static : Note<
"use 'static' to give inline function %0 internal linkage">;
+def warn_possible_object_duplication_mutable : Warning<
+ "%0 is mutable, has hidden visibility,
@@ -508,6 +508,10 @@ New Compiler Flags
- clang-cl and clang-dxc now support
``-fdiagnostics-color=[auto|never|always]``
in addition to ``-f[no-]color-diagnostics``.
+- The ``-Wunique-object-duplication`` warning has been added to warn about
objects
zmodem
@@ -6153,6 +6153,15 @@ def warn_static_local_in_extern_inline : Warning<
def note_convert_inline_to_static : Note<
"use 'static' to give inline function %0 internal linkage">;
+def warn_possible_object_duplication_mutable : Warning<
+ "%0 is mutable, has hidden visibility,
@@ -13374,6 +13374,62 @@ void Sema::checkNonTrivialCUnion(QualType QT,
SourceLocation Loc,
.visit(QT, nullptr, false);
}
+bool Sema::GloballyUniqueObjectMightBeAccidentallyDuplicated(
+const VarDecl *Dcl) {
+ if (!Dcl || !getLangOpts().CPlusPlus)
https://github.com/joaosaffran closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118895
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/TilakChad edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124609
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jvoung created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124964
Check the canonical type in the matchers to handle aliases.
For example std::optional uses add_pointer_t<...>.
>From f5414bee931510d530c440f0590226367ba7913c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Voung
Date: Wed,
quic-garvgupt wrote:
Gentle Ping again!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121829
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/akyrtzi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119269
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jayfoad closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124929
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jay Foad
Date: 2025-01-29T17:49:54Z
New Revision: aa2952165cd1808dab2bb49b97becc097f4c9cac
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aa2952165cd1808dab2bb49b97becc097f4c9cac
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aa2952165cd1808dab2bb49b97becc097f4c9cac.diff
LOG: Fix
https://github.com/broxigarchen converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119750
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/broxigarchen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119750
>From 68ba9f46992b683dcff947e929e5050691acf0f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: guochen2
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:33:14 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] True16 for v_alignbyte_b32 in MC
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/CGB
https://github.com/aartbik approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124929
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@ struct LinalgOpRewriter : public
OpRewritePattern {
AffineExpr i, j, k;
bindDims(getContext(), i, j, k);
-// TODO: more robust patterns, tranposed versions, more kernels,
+// TODO: more robust patterns, transposed versions, more kernels,
@@ -2489,6 +2489,81 @@ are listed below.
$ clang -fuse-ld=lld -Oz -Wl,--icf=safe -fcodegen-data-use code.cc
+Strict Aliasing
+---
+
+The C and C++ standards require accesses to objects in memory to use l-values
of
+an appropriate type for the object. This is
pranavk wrote:
Oops. Too bad. I didn't realize we branched off release/20.x
Anyhow, I made necessary tweaks to now make it a LLVM 21 feature.
> There is a X86 Support section
It feels more appropriate to put this in "ABI changes section" than "X86
support" since it's not a "support". But I a
https://github.com/rjmccall commented:
Last minute re-read caught a couple slip-ups, and yeah, as mentioned, please
feel free to augment this with other relevant information for users. Also, I'm
definitely not sure the separate clang-cl section is worth keeping; it's pretty
short, and any extr
https://github.com/pranavk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120670
>From 2c049c1a377e0b9142d4dcb8682ea27837750810 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pranav Kant
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 02:17:23 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Return larger CXX records in memory
We incorrectly return
@@ -2489,6 +2489,81 @@ are listed below.
$ clang -fuse-ld=lld -Oz -Wl,--icf=safe -fcodegen-data-use code.cc
+Strict Aliasing
+---
+
+The C and C++ standards require accesses to objects in memory to use l-values
of
+an appropriate type for the object. This is
@@ -2489,6 +2489,81 @@ are listed below.
$ clang -fuse-ld=lld -Oz -Wl,--icf=safe -fcodegen-data-use code.cc
+Strict Aliasing
+---
+
+The C and C++ standards require accesses to objects in memory to use l-values
of
+an appropriate type for the object. This is
https://github.com/rjmccall edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122116
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@vbvictor Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a build
https://github.com/nicovank closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122957
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Baranov Victor
Date: 2025-01-29T12:30:56-05:00
New Revision: 15412d735a4f3e85b1c68025ca28d5671fde7b47
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/15412d735a4f3e85b1c68025ca28d5671fde7b47
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/15412d735a4f3e85b1c68025ca28d5671fde7b47.diff
1 - 100 of 147925 matches
Mail list logo
