ricejasonf wrote: @cor3ntin
> Now that the Clang 20 branch has happened, I think we should go ahead with > that PR Does this mean we should adjust the cxx_status page to not say Clang 20? I also see there is a conflict with the ReleaseNotes.md where it appears all of the C++2c items no longer exist. (I guess that is because it is for the next release.) > It would be great to explore merging ResolvedUnexpandedPackExpr and > FunctionParmPackExpr in a separate PR. Is that something you would be > interested in exploring? I can look into this. I will consider `SubstNonTypeTemplateParmPackExpr` as well although I am not sure how special that one is. >Thank you Jason for contributing this feature and for being reactive on this >rather involved review :) Likewise and thank you and the others for your contributions and diligence while reviewing this! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121417 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
