I’m not a core member anymore, but I completely agree with John. The
company affiliation should not be the reason to deny somebody’s promotion
to the core team.
If core members from the particular company will try to influence the
project development in the wrong way – it will be a completely diff
7 PM
*To:* Edison Su
*Cc:* Vladimir Popovski; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Hi Edison,
I think I'm seeing a bit more where you're coming from.
I guess I was under the impression that when a plug-in was invoked to
create storage that the i
y XenServer and VMware code to you and Edison when I finish
my testing (probably tomorrow).
Talk to you later!
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Vladimir Popovski <
vladi...@zadarastorage.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I was away for couple of days, so sorry for the delay.
I’m completely with Mike
ay, March 27, 2013 10:21 AM
*To:* Edison Su
*Cc:* cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; Vladimir Popovski
*Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Sounds good, Edison
Last night I finished up code that uses the VI Java API to create a VMware
Datastore.
I want to test it a bit more b
Hi Edison,
Thank you for the reply. We will check it out.
Regards,
-Vladimir
*From:* Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2013 11:36 AM
*To:* 'Vladimir Popovski'; cloudstack
*Cc:* mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
*Subject:* RE: Storage Subsystem
ilto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:02 PM
To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to remove Primary Storage / NPE in Maintenance mode
On Mar 20, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Vladimir Popovski
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Is there a way to remove the Pri
Hi All,
Is there a way to remove the Primary Storage?
I’m running a clean devcloud on a VM with almost the latest code from the
Master branch (commit ba69ce0c8911eb7186774d2ddbae97483e65d48c from 3/19).
The only UI options I see for 2 Primary Storage instances I’ve added are:
- E
case.
Talk to you later,
-Vladimir
*From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:30 AM
*To:* cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
*Cc:* Vladimir Popovski; Edison Su
*Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Hi,
Yeah, CHAP is not
Fire plugin ever finished?
- How to activate a new plugin and use it (at least through
CLIs/APIs)
- How to integrate it with the UI
Thanks,
-Vladimir
---
Vladimir Popovski
VP, Cloud Operations
Zadara Storage
(949) 677-2095
vladi...@zadarastorage
Hi Ghe,
I suppose it will be very useful. We are planning to create a new project
for nova-volumes (cider?) and I’m sure it will have same duplicate classes.
Sooner we will have a common openstack layer is better.
Regards,
-Vladimir
*From:* openstack-bounces+vladimir=zadarastorage...
+1
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+vladimir=zadarastorage@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+vladimir=zadarastorage@lists.launchpad.net]
On Behalf Of John Griffith
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 4:21 PM
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack] [Ope
, March 15, 2012 9:53 AM
To: Vladimir Popovski
Cc: Vishvananda Ishaya; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Removal of VSA Code
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 09:02 -0700, Vladimir Popovski wrote:
> I was not aware of any issue with VSA code in diablo/stable (or at
> least major issues).
a
completely new code.
Thanks,
-Vladimir
-Original Message-
From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:57 AM
To: Vladimir Popovski
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Removal of VSA Code
Vladimir,
Are you sure the
Hi Vish & All,
We would definitely prefer to leave the code in place and ready to fix any
issues related to it.
We found out that it is extremely hard to work with latest trunk version -
our QA was constantly complaining about different regression scenarios and
we decided to stick with released s
Folks,
We’ve used IRC #openstack-volumes for that and had a mailing-list set up
for the team. Check it out on https://launchpad.net/~openstack-volume
Unfortunately, there was not much going on lately. Primarily I suppose you
can blame me on this as our team was completely overwhelmed by
produ
Have anybody found a root cause of this issue? We are running Natty 2.6.38-8
and experienced it as well.
Any applicable workarounds? We tried to force Linux to generate a core dump in
such situations, but were unsuccessful.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
look for in the meta-data.
Regards,
-Vladimir
*From:* Thomas, Duncan [mailto:duncan.tho...@hp.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 25, 2011 9:21 AM
*To:* Vladimir Popovski; openstack-volume@lists.launchpad.net
*Subject:* RE: [Openstack-volume] adding auxiliary specs to volume create
Hi
I’m
Team,
I would like to propose a change to volume-type aware scheduler we are
developing. After last meeting it was unclear how we will treat volume
affinity or other types of per-volume specifications.
*What I think we could do is to add an additional parameter (optional) to
create volume API t
t we need a volume-type aware scheduler, and thanks for
> > taking this on. I had envisioned it a bit different though. I was
> > thinking that the cluster operator would define the volume types
> > (similar to how they define vm flavors). Each type would have a
> >
table configured through some special set of admin APIs or just
configuration flags?
Regards,
-Vladimir
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Thier [mailto:cth...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 7:39 AM
To: Vladimir Popovski
Cc: openstack-volume@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re
Hi All,
I’ve registered a new blueprint for volume-type aware scheduler:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/volume-type-scheduler
Please take a look at specification attached to it explaining main
principles (feel free to add/change parts of it).
Regards,
-Vladimir
--
Mailing l
Vish,
We are not sure if this particular issue may cause any problem, but just
wanted to understand what is wrong.
To provide a bit more data about this particular environment:
- Dedicated servers config at RAX
- FlatDHCP mode with primary NIC (eth0) bridged and used for
could do ours prior or after that. How about 1pm PST?
Regards,
-Vladimir
*From:* Renuka Apte [mailto:renuka.a...@citrix.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 12, 2011 10:52 AM
*To:* John Griffith; Vladimir Popovski
*Cc:* openstack-volume@lists.launchpad.net; Esker, Robert;
vishvana...@gmail.com
Adding volume ML to cc.
As John pointed before, it might be beneficial if we will meet over
IRC/phone and discuss our requirements for the product. Based on that we
could create some work plan and assign priorities.
How about this coming Thursday… or is it too early? The alternative option –
to
Hi All,
As it was discussed during the Design Summit, there was a desire to create a
Working Group for Nova Volume changes.
If you would like to participate, pls feel free to add yourself to:
https://launchpad.net/~openstack-volume
and/or its mailing list:
openstack-vol...@lists.launchpa
I would prefer to have a separate openstack-dev list, but tend to agree
that it will shift developer's attention from general ML to dev-oriented
one.
At the same time it might be beneficial to move some discussions from
general ML to more narrow ones. During the Design Summit we've agreed to
creat
Alex et al,
I’ve succeeded to reproduce this problem by issuing multiple concurrent
euca-allocate-address & euca-release-address calls.
Here is one of traces from nova-api.log:
2011-09-23 22:07:24,355 ERROR nova.api [3a5ae61d-4e6a-4701-9180-ef6c49a76c61
diego nubeblog] Unexpected error rai
Hi Josh,
I have a question regarding latest changes that were introduced for log file
settings. It seems like now log.py is trying to change mode of log files
using:
os.chmod(self.logpath, FLAGS.logfile_mode)
I’m completely fine with it for all modules except nova-manage… I
Hi Chuck,
This idea is very good aligned with some functionality we intend to
propose as part of our Virtual Storage Array feature.
I suppose in general the goal here is to be able to create a volume from
storage of specified class. For me it means that:
1. User should be able to select storage
that user data is working in the
SecurityGroupTests by passing in a script proxy script that runs on boot.
Vish
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Vladimir Popovski wrote:
Folks,
Have anybody tried to inject user data into instances? Or if anybody
actually tried to use Cloudpipe / VPN
Folks,
Have anybody tried to inject user data into instances? Or if anybody
actually tried to use Cloudpipe / VPN functionality?
It seems like there is some code missing (at least on libvirt/connection
level).
If I’m not missing anything, EC2 RunInstances takes user_data from kwargs
argume
31 matches
Mail list logo
