On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I'm still sorting it out, but I must say I wholly disagree with this bit.
> The Fora rule allows any player to make an announcement by sending a message
> via a public forum. It is a simple inference from slave golem mechanisms to
> say that t
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ID: 7315
> Title: Power of the Herald
> Author: omd
> AI: 1.5
> Chamber: Ordinary
N.b. the Promotor here missed the first line of the proposal:
> Amend Rule 649 (Patent Titles) by inserting this paragraph after the second:
It's been two months and a half since Taral posted here, so I'm
guessing we really need to decide who is going to run the lists.
Again, I volunteer; if someone else wants to do it, please reply, and
I suppose we can have an informal election.
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Klaus Herrmanns wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So what is currently going on in Agora? After some time spent browsing
> recent mail archives and CFJs I'm not quite sure whether the game is in a
> post-scam reorientation phase (still trying to figure out whether the scam
> succe
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The scam was pretty complicated but I think most people just decided to go
> even
> quieter and wait to see if it worked. I think consensus was it didn't, at
> least
> the CFJs that said it didn't haven't been appealed. Of course, the scam
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I intend to cause Rule 2380 to append "scshunt CAN, by announcement,
>> cause this Rule to perform an arbitrary change to the gamestate."
>
> Do you intend to do so With Notice?
I intend,
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:31 PM, omd wrote:
> Well, with no hard feelings, I intend, with two support, to appeal
> this judgement. ;p
Nobody? Well... I guess we can get this over with.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2012, omd wrote:
>> CFJ: I own multiple Machiavelli trading cards.
>
> I disfavor all open cases called by omd. -G.
I had to try something.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> Arguments: the intended interpretation (which would lead to a
> judgement of TRUE) was perfectly clear, well-defined, and reasonable.
> omd's interpretation (which led to a judgement of FALSE) is to
> interpret the condition as being ill-defi
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Jonathan Rouillard
wrote:
> AFFIRM without prejudice.
No arguments from either of you?
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
wrote:
> I agree that "A player can do [action] without objection" translates
> to "A golem can do [action] without objection", not simply "A golem
> can do [action]" without the objection part. I think it's reasonable
> to say that a Player ann
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Klaus Herrmanns wrote:
> Would it be legal to bribe people to vote in certain ways by promising them
> (formally or informally) a reward to be paid in trading cards?
Legal and encouraged. Vote manipulation is fun.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2012, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I intend, without objection, to deputise for the Promotor to
>> distribute undistributed proposals.
>
> I think the office is vacant so you can just do this right out?
I unfortunately assumed it.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:53 PM, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
>> 7319 1.0 Ordinary G. Trading Cards
> FAP
>> 7320 1.0 Ordinary scshunt Lexicon
> FAP
>> 7321 2.0 Ordinary Murphy Appeal of appeals
&
TTttCF
-- Forwarded message --
From: omd
Date: Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: BUS: Getting around to things (attn: Registrar)
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On second thought, I object. The new lists should
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Happy New Year, Agora!
>
> See you all on the 7th (or not)
>
> -scshunt
I award myself a Pink Ribbon.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> As each Slave Golem is an entity with zero Props, and zero is less than
> nine, each Slave Golem is a Marine under the last sentence of R2376.
FOR
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> --Machiavelli, who hopes that there's a keyboard layout for Windows
> that makes typing em dashes easy while not impairing the typing of
> things that can be typed on an ordinary US keyboard
In OS X it's option-shift-dash.
(Unhelpfully yours
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Arguments:
Holy crap, this is an old case.
Gratuitous: By itself, "I cause X to send a message with the same text
as Y" may be reasonable shorthand, but isn't there some precedent that
we should take the global view and consider the shorthand unreasonable
because it is being used to effectively send an infinitely long
message?
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:48 PM, woggle wrote:
> Re: "the online versions", comex's are out of date (AFAIK), but see
> https://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~charles/agora/ .
I've updated my online version to include this link. Maybe some day I
will revamp my web interface...
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> Proto-proposal, "Options":
Wasn't there something else along these lines recently?
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> *7329 1.0 Antony The Card That Owned Itself
> *7331 1.0 Antony Let's bookbind differently
> *7332 1.0 Antony Lesser oops
CoE: I did not write any of these proposals.
By the way, I change my name to omd.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> Presumably you mean "I also vote for Machiavelli, as he seems to have
> been doing an adequate job", rather than "I also vote for myself, as I
> seem to have been doing an adequate job".
Presumably.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:53 PM, woggle wrote:
> THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
It would be nice if this document contained a link to the online FLR...
which apparently I never did. Oops. I thought I started doing that
at some point.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Slave golems have been used for ownership scams, criminal scams, and
> currency scams. Anything genuinely "useful" in there?
It used to be possible to let partnerships (not slave golems) vote by
spending assets on their behalf, with the somewh
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> I call a CFJ on the following statement: A person CAN violate Rule 101
> by failing to treat Agora right good forever without violating any
> other regulation found in Rule 101.
Evidence: CFJ 2515.
I think you've missed last week's VVLOP report, unless I've missed
something, so just a reminder that you're supposed to publish it. :)
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Arguments: this fails due to rule 2150; a rule needs power at least 2 to
> define an entity as a person. Defining a rule as a golem is defining it
> to be a person, among other things.
Arguments: As I mentioned on IRC, clearly if a high-powered
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: New Beginnings (AI=3)
Generally, I was going to respond negatively, criticizing the extra
complexity introduced when the latest batch of changes might finally
produce a solid basis for gameplay (unlike several past attempts that
are st
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> The Proposal Pool contains the following proposals:
>
> AI CHAMBER AUTHOR TITLE
> 1.0 Ordinary omd Plan B
>
> The above proposal is undistributed because its AI is too small for it
> to be effect
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> I submit a proposal, titled "Seventy-Three Ninety-Five": In Rule 2367
> "Messy Statements", replace "inaccurate and incorrect" with
> "nonsensical and meaningless".
>
> Arguments: considering both a statement and its negation to be
> meaningfu
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Wes Contreras wrote:
> This is a case where comma placement parses the sentence quite differently.
>
> "If there is no [[[Agoran Decision to adopt a particular proposal that
> has an outcome of ADOPTED]]], that proposal CANNOT take effect, rules
> to the contrary n
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> Admitted. Since the report also contained a correct account of the
> Proposal Pool's contents, it is not necessary (if I'm not mistaken)
> for me to publish that account a second time.
>
> Want me to distribute that proposal, by the way?
Does
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
>> TL;DR: the office of ATC is vacant and the Registrar is behind in eir
>> duties.
>
> I initiate an election for Registrar. omd is considered to have
> nominate
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> 7386 2.0 Ordinary scshunt Eraser
> FOR. Sorry Bayes, the small positive you contribute isn't worth the
> large negatives brought by the rest of the golems.
For the record, just the other day I was planning to make a new Bayes
with a
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The most someone can get is just under 3xbase, I'm not sure this really
> that unfair compared to a lot of past systems? Or am I missing
> something. -G.
Oops, I forgot that the default limit is now 4...
In general I think the limit should
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:54 PM, woggle wrote:
>>> 7382 1.0 Plutocra omd Плутократия!
> With 3 Agoran consent, I hereby make the decision to adopt Proposal 7382
> Democratic.
>
> Murphy and Roujo supported and there were no objectors.
Oops, I forgot to object...
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> The new rule has power as specified by the enacting
> instrument, defaulting to one if not specified, but if
> that power is less than a minimum or more than a maximum
> specified in another rule, then the
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> If it is ambiguous whether or not the proposal contained the
> text in brackets, then it could be argued that I chose to interpret
> the text in brackets as not being part of the text of the proposal,
> and thus the distribution succeeded.
G
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3306
>
> == CFJ 3306 ==
>
> scshunt satisfies the Victory Condition of Junta due to Rule
> 2380
>
> ==
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:32 PM, omd wrote:
> I hereby deregister all Golems and Agora Nomic.
correction: the Golems were already destroyed, so this only deregistered Agora.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I don't think this solves the problem. I think the problem is people
> putting in switches without thinking about tracking, the requirement
> to add "untracked" doesn't help. Also, I'm nervous about having
> untracked switches in general.
W
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:36 PM, omd wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to change the Publicity of the fora
> currently located at agora-busin...@agoranomic.org,
> agora-offic...@agoranomic.org, and agora-discussion@agoranomic.org to
> Foreign.
I am now sending the above ann
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:04 PM, omd wrote:
>> Apr 16 0:13 Report published
>> Machiavelli -6
>
> While this seems (more or less) accurate, I notice that you didn't put
> down the reason for this
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
wrote:
> The Ambassador must debunk any impersonators' claims within a week or
> so, even if he isn't even aware such a claim has been made. Here's a
> fix:
You might also want to only require making a reasonable effort to
inform the nomic. See
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> (But I assume that the Promotor can do that practically effortlessly,
> and it wouldn't actually help the Rulekeepor at all.)
As Promotor, it's my policy not to reformat proposals because (a) it
historically hasn't typically been done, (b) t
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> { Enforcement
>
> Enact a Rule entitled "The Prosecutor" with the following text:
>
> The Prosecutor is an office. As soon as possible after a player
> breaks the Rules, the Prosecutor SHALL i
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:20 PM, woggle wrote:
> THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
Are you going to keep the web ruleset at
https://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~charles/agora/current_flr.txt updated?
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> Yaks, with currency symbol '#' are a class of assets and a
> currency; their ownership is restricted to players. The Yak
missing comma, and "class of assets and a currency" is redundant
> The Yak Herdor CAN destroy other
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
>>> Any player CAN, by announcement, set the Chamber of an entity to
>>> Democratic for a cost of 1000 Yaks.
>>
>> Democracy is easy enough already :(
>
> Would you rather I:
> a) Increase the cost
> b) Remove the other method of d
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The final version will go through and replace a bunch of crimes with
> infractions and maybe add a few. This is just to proto the mechanism.
You should also replace some serious but unmarked SHALL NOTs with
Crimes, such as R2143's prohibitio
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> To which I'll expand: the prime example of permissiveness in CFJ 1719 was
> partnerships (now gone)
Arguments: Partnerships, including the implicit ability to act on
behalf of them, were originally recognized by CFJ (by you in CFJ
1622), with
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:19 PM, omd wrote:
> Even though the effect of such a misinterpretation is
> lessened in this case because the general effects of the action
> scshunt meant to take and the one e wrote are the same, it's still a
> misinterpretation, and the potential
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:44 PM, woggle wrote:
> See CFJ 1856 (finding that there was insufficient evidence, in a similar
> situation, that the act-on-behalf agreement met the historical versions of
> R101(iii) and R101(iv) and therefore judged such an attempt unsuccessful).
Arguments: djanatyn h
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Defining a bank for a Rules-backed currency is
> Secured.
As written, only the rule defining a currency can define a Bank for
it, so securing this is unnecessary.
> The creation or
> awarding of instances of a Rules-backed cu
Did everyone not realize this was coming up, or just me? :)
I invite any sort of publicity that might encourage Agora's current
just-getting-out-of-a-slump.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> A singleton switch is a switch for which Agora Nomic is the only
> entity possessing an instance of that switch.
You could just say Agora Nomic switch.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I don't see why the archives need authentication at all.
>
> Wasn't it a defense against email-harvesting issue?
Not everyone has Gmail's spam filtering!
That said, it's not like we've ever tried particularly hard to protect
email addresses,
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:50 AM, omd wrote:
> There is an experimental feature which I went ahead and implemented,
> but I'd appreciate feedback and will turn it off if desired: all list
> messages are piped through a script which rewrites the Date header to
> be the same as t
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 2 May 2013 18:18, omd wrote:
>> Not everyone has Gmail's spam filtering!
>
> Surely even mailman can weakly obfuscate addresses in the archives.
The archives include the raw mbox, and I don't really want to
obf
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 2 May 2013 17:58, omd wrote:
>> The archives include the raw mbox, and I don't really want to
>> obfuscate that, because then the obfuscated version will end up
>> getting backed up and published someday ;p
>
&
Testing. Just set OLD_STYLE_PREFIXING = No, so the subject of this
message should be "DIS: Re: OFF:", as before, instead of "Re: DIS:
OFF:"
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> ...and unfortunately, it seems that this is enough to make Gmail treat
>> the message as distinct from the original, so if you send a reply, you
>> now get a duplicate, rather than that only happening when you switch
>> fora. Pfft.
>
> This is a
- Date hack disabled until I can figure out what to do about the
duplicate messages.
- Slightly updated http://www.agoranomic.org and now on GitHub at
https://github.com/comex/agoranomic. (I updated the FLR links,
removed the text about me being the Rulekeepor, changed the link to
http://www.win.t
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
> Proposal: Numericity (AI=2)
> {{{
> Enact a new power-3 rule entitled "Integral Switches" as follows:
> An integral switch is a switch defined as such by the rules. An
> integral switch may be defined to have any or all of:
Defined
testing digest.
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 3:50 PM, omd wrote:
> testing digest.
oops, derp.
I fixed something, but I also didn't receive any digest when I ran
senddigests. Testing again. Sorry for the spam.
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:19 PM, omd wrote:
> I fixed something, but I also didn't receive any digest when I ran
> senddigests. Testing again. Sorry for the spam.
Never mind. It should be fixed now. Also, the archives are now being
properly updated.
One more test - this time I'm trying to fix the "DIS: Re:" problem.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
> On May 5, 2013 1:03 AM, "Henri Bouchard" wrote:
>>
>> Who is the current Rulekeepor?
>>
>
> It hasn't changed since I published my report...
He just subscribed.
It's woggle, ruleset is at
https://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~charles/agora/current_f
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> What is an entity?
> Is it the same thing as a player?
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/entity
Everything is an entity.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 11:12 PM, comex wrote:
>> djanatyn [1] c/o Machiavelli 2013-04-29
>
> djanatyn can be reached at djana...@gmail.com.
Noted.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I initiate a criminal CFJ alleging that omd violated Rule 2143 by failing to
> report on Adoption Index and Chamber last week.
Defendant's arguments: I considered publishing such a report, but
Adoption Index of Agoran Decisio
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> Sounds fun. I join the Bucky Proposal Proxy Party. Even though I don't
> think co-authors are going to get VCs once a certain proposal passes.
It already passed, sorry :p
[13:42:48]I can't believe I was distributor for 10 years.
[13:42:59]Someone award me "10 Years Long Service" please.
I thank you for your long service. :)
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Like I've said, I support the return of contract law. In fact I'm working on
>> a proto at the minute.
>
> The point is, we don't need complex charters for the basic "let's
> run a sub-game based around an event and have it go away after a
> c
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 6 May 2013, omd wrote:
>> > 7421 3 G.What you WILL
>> AGAINST
>
> Is there a bug here I should know about, or you just don't
> like the shorthand?
I'm somewhat against it because &
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Yeah, I had problem coming up with an easy short phrase. WILL isn't
> used so I picked that. (I thought about REQUESTED AND REQUIRED, while
> nice and colorful, it isn't that much shorter, and raises the question
> about whether "requested" an
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Benjamin Schultz
wrote:
> Why me? ::checks drop-box::
I was proposing rules copied verbatim from past proposals - somewhat
pointlessly. By my count, two or three of my proposals would actually
be interesting to adopt; I was hoping for better when I went looking
f
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> I intend to become a player at this time.
Welcome back!
Incidentally, G., would you like me to restore the note about "Gravity
Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck e^(-kt)", or is your
nickname now officially G.? (It was removed at so
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Incidentally, G., would you like me to restore the note about "Gravity
>> Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck e^(-kt)", or is your
>> nickname now officially G.? (It was removed at some point when you
>> deregistered and came back.)
>
>
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> Oops, sorry, wrong mailing list.
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
>> I'm confused. Shouldn't this be in the Business mailing list?
The proposals were indeed sent to the business mailing list
(http://www.agoranomic.o
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
>> 7419 3 omd Clear the books
> AGAINST
Why?
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> I vote:
NttPF
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> As long as you're rewriting headers, can you rewrite them to move Date:
> to the bottom? Makes it easier to find.
Okay. I currently have the header rewriting disabled because of the
Gmail issue, but I'll address that and implement your suggest
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:49 PM, woggle wrote:
> I hereby appeal this judgment.
>
> Arguments:
> The message was eventually delivered. Per CFJ 1646 and CFJ 2058, it was sent
> when it left my technical domain of control, which was before the deadline.
> Even if this precedent does not apply, on it
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:57 PM, James Beirne wrote:
> ...by the way, and I'd like be referred to by that name (if it's not too
> much trouble).
Noted. Welcome back.
- The Registrar
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> I don't think it necessarily makes sense to say that the severity of a crime
> is linearly proportional to its Class. I don't feel like seven class-2 crimes
> ought to equate to one class-14 crime. Quadratic makes more sense to me
> persona
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Wes Contreras wrote:
>> Proposal 7434 (AI=3, Ordinary) by omd
>> Fifty-Nine Thirty-Seven
>
> We vote AGAINST. We find victory by paradox to still be quite possible.
How so?
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Wes Contreras wrote:
> Do you contend that an infinite recursion is the only means by which
> the truth value of an inquiry CFJ cannot be determined? If so, we
> contend that you lack imagination, but would prefer not to demonstrate
> such a thing until we can do s
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> I submit a promise, titled "Gold Z", with empty text, and with condition for
> cashing "The sum of all numbers 2^n such that I have a promise titled 'Gold
> 2^n' is an even number greater than 2 that is not the sum of two prime
> numbers."
For the record, prompted by someone asking to be a Watcher, I just
sent this out.
-- Forwarded message --
From: omd
Date: Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:27 PM
Subject: Pinging Watchers of Agora Nomic
To: b...@fushizen.net, cmil...@brainsprain.net, davidni...@gmail.com,
xmb...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Thinking of defaults, I was also wondering about default
> expirations, (as these promises tend to lose relevance over time).
I think Horton's destruction without objection is sufficient for those.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
wrote:
> If I haven't already voted on these, I vote PRESENT on all of them.
>
> (I sent a message to the list, but it was down so it told me that it
> would retry automatically. I have no idea if it actually did, so eh.
> =P)
It did.
Incidenta
This one's not even my fault :)
After the actual domain transfer for agoranomic.org completed
yesterday, I attempted to transfer DNS from the servers Taral was
using to namecheap's servers, first by choosing namecheap's transfer
DNS feature and then by directly changing the list of DNS servers.
Af
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> A party is a type of second-class person and a player.
What happens if one is deregistered?
> A player CAN flip eir party membership by
> announcement, provided that e satisfies any conditions for doing
> so in the con
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I was the Registrar who sent out that 2011 email, and everyone flipped a
> shit that I removed people without their explicit instruction to do so. IIRC
> I ended up removing the non-responders anyway (which was nearly all of the
> Watchers a
801 - 900 of 1475 matches
Mail list logo
