On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> 7386 2.0 Ordinary scshunt Eraser > FOR. Sorry Bayes, the small positive you contribute isn't worth the > large negatives brought by the rest of the golems.
For the record, just the other day I was planning to make a new Bayes with a (slightly) more sophisticated algorithm, and I think that now that we're finally allowing drastically unfair voting on ordinary proposals and a corresponding way to give second-class persons meaningful voting power, it might not be the best to remove them entirely, which is why I voted against the one to repeal Public Agreements (also because scshunt's going to get a ridiculous number of VCs, as opposed to a slightly less ridiculous number of VCs if all these repeals were in a single proposal). However, assuming these all pass, I can always have em vote on my behalf, which would be cheaper anyway (since only first-class persons are eligible for single-VC voting limit increases).
