2008/6/24 Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Teh Cltohed Mna registers.
>>
>> ehird
>>
>
> I thought that already happened
>
Yeah, not as far as I can tell in the logs.
On 24/06/2008, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you click that in a web browser, you'll get a nice HTML&CSS version
>> of the Notary proto-report.
>
> javascript:
> "Contestmaster: " overlaps (in FF 3, Opera 9.5, Safari 1.3.1).Weird.
> WFM.
> Can the index be table-ified? e.g.
>
> Co Pu Pl Pa Name
>
> N Y N N Agoran Twister
> Y Y N N The Agoran Agriculturalociation
>
Good idea. Sorry for that quote. iPhone weirdness.
2008/6/24 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Contestmaster: " overlaps (in FF 3, Opera 9.5, Safari 1.3.1).
Ah, I think this is because your font size is above the default. I'll
try and fix that later.
ehird
2008/6/24 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I perform the following action on behalf of ehird: ehird deregisters.
>
A proto-contract, if anyone wishes to make it:
{
This contract is a pledge iff it has one member.
This is a public contract.
Parties to this contract must deregister comex at any time th
2008/6/24 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Evidence: See http://eso-std.org/~ais523/notary-report for the current
> text of the AFO.
>
http://eso-std.org/~ais523/notary-report#the-afo, FWIW
ehird
2008/6/24 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On second read-through: I had read that as "excITEment." Now I get it.
> Where's my duh button?..
> -
> Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
> OscarMeyr
>
I think it's like bahs - you need support first. You say 'Duh', then
you get two support, then '
2008/6/24 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is it worth stringing up comex over these?
> -
> Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
> OscarMeyr the Vicious
>
Yes (though I may be biased)
2008/6/25 Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ah. May I refer Sir to a copy of the DOM Level 2 Events specification, then?
>
> --
> Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
> -- Unknown
>
There is little point. The link is non-functional without JS,
2008/6/25 Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How? I can attempt to terminate it without objection if you like,
> but someone might object.
> --
> ais523
>
Er, that'd be nice.
ehird
2008/6/25 Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I tried arguing this one with ehird (the first-class person) privately
> earlier; eir argument was that the contract still devolved its obligations
> onto Ivan Hope CXXVII even though e had no way of causing it to fulfil
> them. I'm not sure if this
2008/6/25 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You would threaten the Godfather? I submit the following:
>
> Sell Ticket
> Cost: 5VP
> Action: not object to the termination of the pledge that permits
> players to act on behalf of ehird
>
> BobTHJ
>
Nice try.
2008/6/25 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why isn't it a person?
>>
> In order to be a partnership it must devolve its legal obligations
> onto a subset of its parties numbering at least two. Presently it only
> devolves its
2008/6/25 Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 5573 O0 1Teh Cltohe comex, as e is while burning in the fire...
> AGAINSTx11 (can power-1 proposals register people?)
Dunno. Would you vote for a version that would work if the current one doesn't?
2008/6/25 Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Perhaps. Although, to be honest, what did you expect to happen when
> you posted those pledges? You could have constrained them to something
> minor, like votes.
I was expecting a bit of restraint - deregistering is not particularly novel or
unique or funny.
2008/6/26 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> H. Notary, can you provide me with the ehrid contract and membership as
> it stood at the time of this CFJ (or confirm that the text and membership
> on the website you've provided was accurate to that time)? -Goethe
>
http://eso-std.org/~ais523/nota
2008/6/26 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Can you (all of you) please continue referring to ehrid as Teh Cltohed
> Mna? Calling it ehrid does nothing but make people look twice so that
> they know who you're referring to.
>
> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>
Since I am notehird now, it's not that ambiguous. (Thi
2008/6/26 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As I indicated previously, I don't mind minor corruption of the
> judicial system through the Protection Racket, however I am not
> interested in bringing down all the upstanding citizens of Agora upon
> my head. I therefore invite ehird or notehird (whi
2008/6/26 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Proto-Proposal: Ruleset as Contract
> (AI = 3, II = 3, please)
You sent this to a-b. Oops?
notehird
2008/6/26 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gratuitous: my first thought was: "I should deregister em. Naw, that's
> boring." But the fact that it was (apparently) the first thought of
> many who read it might mean it should have been envisioned as likely.
> -Goethe.
>
I didn't envision that i
2008/6/26 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> H. Notary, as "ehrid" is/was (apparently) a public contract, can you confirm
> the text and membership in the PF? -Goethe
H. Notary is ais523, and he has root on that server. (So do I, but I certainly
didn't twiddle the bits.)
The previous official No
2008/6/26 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> That's not the same as providing testimony in a forum of record. If e points
> me to the same info, that's sufficient. The issue is, I want a second opinion
> on what varied changes happened and when. -G.
>
Yes, I was just making a note.
ehird
2008/6/26 Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Any Don can
> cause another Don to cease to be bound by this contract without the
> objection of a Don."
>
> Is this to be able to easily kick out inactive Dons? Because the Don to be
> kicked out can always just object..
>
I imagine so.
2008/6/26 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I protest. I have never been on that server.
>
> -root (hoping for a [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address)
>
*g*
ehird
2008/6/26 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gratuitous argument: a reasonable person wouldn't agree to be bound by
> a contract so that restricted eir behavior in such a way. (On the
> other hand, "would cause" seems a bit weak; if it was worded "might
> cause" there might be a stronger argume
2008/6/26 tusho ? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/6/26 Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> All new members between today and day x, where x is the day ehird can
>> re-register are suspicious in my book.
>>
>
> Hmm .. you just contacted me on gmail chat about this. I'll quote it
>
> (WORDS)
Unfortunate choi
2008/6/26 tusho ? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well! I'd like to join this here Agoranomicgamething. May I? Good,
> that's nice of you.
>
> I join.
>
> --
> tusho ? (questionmark)
>
Welcome to Agora, by the way. You're a player, which is more than I
can say.
ehird
2008/6/26 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hmmdidn't think of that. Perhaps the Protection Racket needs
> amended to allow such action?
>
> BobTHJ
>
That would be too specific. It's an odd clause.
ehird
. . . . . . o . . . . . . o . . . . . o . o O . o O O O O O O O
/-\
| |
| |
\-/
/-\
| |
| |
\-/
/-\
2008/6/26 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gratuituous evidence:
Very gratuitous considering my last 'work of art'.
2008/6/26 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/6/26 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Gratuituous evidence:
>
> Very gratuitous considering my last 'work of art'.
>
Oh, and I do indeed use the name 'tusho'. It wasn't made up
on the spot.
2008/6/26 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ps. thanks for coming clean, e-not-rid-hird.
However, depending on who you ask, I may be 'ehrid'.
2008/6/26 Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Wait, what? What server?
>
> --
> Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
> -- Unknown
>
eso-std.org's server.
2008/6/27 Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I submit the following proposal: AI=3 II=0 Name='Race the Hare' Co-Author=Sgeo
>
> change 'initiator' to 'initiator of the tortoise'
>
Change it where, exactly?
> I realize my mistake.
ISTID!
2008/6/27 Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ehird wrote:
>> With 2 support I intend to bah.
> I support.
> I support.
> --
> ais523
>
Having recieved the neccessary support, I bah.
ehird
2008/6/27 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> comex wrote:
>
>> I initiate a criminal case against ehird, for violating Rule 2149 by
>> saying that e joins. In fact, as e knew, the statement was
>> ineffective (because e deregistered less than thirty days prior to
>> it), so e did not join at any tim
2008/6/27 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ais523 wrote:
>
>> Murphy wrote:
>>> ehird, I inform you of this case (2048) and invite you to rebut the
>>> argument against your guilt.
>> Aren't you supposed to invite em to rebut the argument in favour of
>> eir guilt?
>
> Sorry, yes, I invite ehird to
2008/6/27 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Was Manroster a public contract? I've lost track of that. If so,
> the official membership list doesn't change until the change is
> published (R2178). -Goethe
The Manroster is just a list in the ehrid/mna contract.
ehird
2008/6/27 Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hmm... a contract that imposes no obligations on you, but which you
> expect players to join?
> --
> ais523
>
Hey, I'm hopeful that I'll be a player soon...
ehird
2008/6/27 Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I agree to this contract. If there are any such ordinary decisions
> that I can attempt to change to democratic, I do so with 2 support. If
> there are any current attempts to change an ordinary decision to
> democratic that I can support, I do so.
>
NttPF
eh
2008/6/27 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In that case, ehrid still has two partners, so the attempts to
> deregister it were unsuccessful. Updating records accordingly.
>
>
But the Manroster contains a non-player (me). The contract states
it is a list of players.
???
ehird
2008/6/27 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I perform the following action on behalf of ehird:
>> {{{I file a CFJ on the statement "This CFJ was filed by ehird".}}}
>
> Why?
>
Testing 'I' in on-behalf actions, says
2008/6/27 Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I perform the following action on behalf of ehird:
>> {{{I file a CFJ on the statement "This CFJ was filed by ehird".}}}
>> --
>> ais523
>>
>
> You've gotten into the same I probl
2008/6/27 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's already a contest.
Ironic.
2008/6/27 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> With the majority consent of the Dons I de-protect this CFJ.
>
> I judge FALSE.
>
> BobTHJ
>
Your judicial corruption is going well, I see.
ehird
2008/6/27 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I create and agree to the following pledge titled "Agoran Slavery":
No.
2008/6/27 Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Proposal titled "Defend Democracy!" AI>=1.5 II=?
> No agreement is allowed to force a person to vote a certain way or to
> not vote on any democratic decision.
>
This is against the Spirit of the Game, I think.
2008/6/28 Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I object.
>
> -zefram
>
why?
2008/6/28 Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You can't vote on these proposals. Here's part of the distribution
> message that you didn't quote:
>
> | The eligible voters for ordinary
> |proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic
> |proposal
2008/6/28 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My VP is now 50 or above.
>
> I give Pavrita 20 Vote Points.
You know, ais523 stole VP from me and gave them to you
because he thought you desperately wanted to be out of the Vote Market.
2008/6/29 Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>D D E D G Gb / D D E D A G / D D D B G Gb E / C C B G A G
AGORA, YOU SUCK.
I mean happy birthday.
ehird
2008/6/30 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And we still don't really have anything to go on. ais523 knew that we
> needed public voting, and e paid for it with eir life.
>
> -root
>
This. We need it.
ehird
2008/6/30 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ehird wrote:
>
>>> 5577 O1 1comex I don't deserve Scamster!
>> AGAINSTx4
> [etc.]
>
> Unsuccessful because you aren't an eligible voter.
>
Yes, I remembered that now.
2008/6/30 Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I support ais523 making Proposal 5582 Democratic.
>
AWESOME
2008/6/30 Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>Proposal 'Homo sapiens' AI=3 ii=0
>>
>> We're not speciesist here. We have precedent for a blob of (biological)
>> mauve goo being a player.
>>
>> Also, you spelled the binomial name correctly in the title but not in
>> the body of the proposal. The specif
2008/6/30 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hmph. So many accusations! But ehird has still not accepted my offer of
> chits!
>
> I nominate EHIRD.
>
> And I also nominate ZEFRAM, because coming out of the blue to nominate
> Pavrita is... a little suspicious.
>
Your arguments suck.
ehird
2008/6/30 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Keeping in mind there are some who have frowned upon legislative play too,
> and believe 1 person/1 vote
Democratic revolutionaries! :P
ehird
2008/6/30 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Haven't you followed modern american judicial proceedings? The law be
> damned. Legislation from the bench is the new politically correct
> wave. It is a convenient way to override the inconvenient majority.
>
> BobTHJ
>
Let's adopt it posthaste.
ehird
2008/6/30 Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I fully support legislative play for ordinary decisions, but not
> democratic decisions. As far as I'm concerned, the point of the
> distinction is to have a playground for decisions on things that won't
> completely change things, but when there are important
2008/6/30 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Religiously (ooh, bad word choice)
Somehow I think the "dead persons = people" debate will go that way.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] death
ehird
2008/6/30 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Huh? I thought you were the champion of the anti-ISIDTID crowd?
>
> BobTHJ
>
It IS a win announcement, though. Maybe e's doing a scam involving one.
ehird
2008/6/30 Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I agree::Agora to this contract::Agora and register::Flapjack
>
This is Flapjack::unintelligable.
ehird
2008/7/1 Michael Norrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's +12 (hours) because I started the game from Wellington, New Zealand.
>
> Michael.
>
>
Hi there!
ehird
All the credit goes to me, naturally, since I pushed em to do it. :P
On 01/07/2008, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Cctoide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I hereby register under the nickname cctoide.
>
> Well, it's about time. You've been lurking for what,
2008/7/1 Nick Vanderweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I change my name to ehird.
>
Please don't, this is confusing enough as it is.
(We need a Reasonability Court.)
tusho
2008/7/1 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You use Gmail. What do you need a hard drive for?
>
> -root
>
Mirroring google.
tusho
2008/7/1 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Does anyone check their Agora mail exclusively via a portable
> device(serious question)?
No. I check via gmail's web mobile interface on my iPhone at night,
though.
And if I need to reply I use its Basic HTML view (otherwise the
textbox is too small to
2008/7/1 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 5582 O0 1ais523 another probably unsuccessful attempt at...
> FOR * 6
It's democratic.
2008/7/1 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I rename my lands as follows:
> land #4 North Canton
> land #18South Canton
> land #21Times Square
> land #28Black Adder
> land #2 Twilight Zone
> land #54C++
> land #57Zoeland
> land #66S
2008/7/3 Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> After you kill me and find out I'm a townsperson,
> I suggest you lynch ehird.
You seem pretty resigned to your death, eh?
And all you can do upon it is suggest to lynch me...
Very interesting!
ehird
2008/7/4 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Any player can join this contract by announcement.
>
> You're not a player; how do you propose to become a party?
>
Well, I wasn'
2008/7/4 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Heh heh. This is like checking the box on the (U.S.) Federal forms that
> state "I have never used illegal drugs and I am not a spy."
>
> -Goethe
Yes, but criminal CFJs are fun.
ehird
2008/7/4 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/7/4 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Heh heh. This is like checking the box on the (U.S.) Federal forms that
>> state "I have never used illegal drugs and I am not a spy."
>>
>> -Goethe
>
&g
2008/7/4 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This contract is an interesting twist on playing Mafia. Where I played (and
> often kibitz), nobody's ever tried making a binding agreement that members
> are not Scum. I'll be interested in seeing how this works.
> -
> Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
>
http://nomic.info/perlnomic
The permissions on players.txt were broken for a few days.
Now it's 404'd.
I hope it's back sometime.
Say, is the PNP a player anymore? It can't do anything...
tusho
2008/7/5 Matthew Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have been watching agora with much interest for some time, and have begun
> to admire the creature.
>
> Have you ever thought of setting it free from its shackles and allowing it
> to grow to its fullest potential?
>
> - arkestra
>
>
what?
2008/7/6 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Of course, a good way to fix this sort of issue would be to adopt a
> rule stating that participants agree to license their messages under,
> say, GFDL or CC-BY to cover future postings, then get licenses from as
> many current and former participants
2008/7/6 Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Now if you were to bring a case about eir (implied?) claim to be a
> different entity, that would perhaps be a violation of Rule 2149. But
> the action itself isn't.
Don't think I ever claimed that on a PF.
tusho
2008/7/6 Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes, but I'm innocent anyway. See my arguments for that other CFJ about the
>> same
>> thing. If performing a failing action is illegal, I
2008/7/6 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I vote FOR that proposal.
>
> Me too.
>
> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>
Ambiguous, especially since you didn't do it in FLAPJACK.
tusho
E is currently trying to convince Olipro to support it on IRC. If e
does, e can spend some VP and win.
Eek! A call to action!
tusho
2008/7/7 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> E is currently trying to convince Olipro to support it on IRC. If e
> does, e can spend some VP and win.
>
> Eek! A call to action!
>
> tusho
>
Suggestion to all filled VPers if they don't want this to happen:
Wait
2008/7/7 ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And breach the spirit of the Vote Market?
> --
> ais523
>
You bet.
2008/7/7 Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I object to all pending attempts to act on behalf of Agora [if I
> haven't already].
>
> -woggle
>
Thank you.
2008/7/7 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I submit the following proposal titled "Refactor Extortion" (AI=2):
>
> ==
>
> Repeal Rule 2172 (Acting on Behalf of Agora).
>
> Amend Rule 2189 (Win by Extortion) to read:
>
> A playe
2008/7/7 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Meh. Ultimately I don't care too strongly whether the attempt is
> successful or not. It's just a win, and I don't currently hold MwP,
> so I really have nothing to lose by it.
>
> Since when can non-players object to dependent actions, anyway?
>
> -root
2008/7/7 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Oops, I missed that it was a Buy Ticket. In that case: since when do
> you have VP, anyway?
>
> -root
>
I posted it as a mistake.
Previously ais523 had agreed that e would reserve the VP e stole from
me for use as I wished, and I was going to use that.
2008/7/7 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, only players can act on behalf of Agora with Agoran Consent, so
> this probably won't do much good. But I offer moral support.
>
Maybe someone else can try it again tomorrow (Acting on behalf of Agora
is being repealed, but you can still extort
2008/7/7 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You have to object to an action *before* it's performed if you want it
> to have any effect.
>
> -root
>
And did it?
2008/7/7 Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As much as it pains me to be loyal to Agora
Fixed that for you.
2008/7/7 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Welcome Olipro! How'd you find out about this game?
> -
> Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
> OscarMeyr
>
Sgeo, I think.
tusho
2008/7/7 Olipro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Someone posted a link to it some time in a channel I'm in, actually, I think
> Sgeo found it at that time to by the same means.
>
> Olipro
Sgeo is from IRCNomic/Canada.
2008/7/8 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Rule 2189/0 (Power=2)
> Win by Extortion
>
> Upon a player...
> ^^
As observant as the 3 people before you, I see.
2008/7/8 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Pending CFJ :)
Oi, Protection Racket!
2008/7/8 Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If this works, I suggest the Herald record these wins as by Bandwagon.
>
> Pavitra
>
I second this motion. (Only one more support needed!)
2008/7/8 Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 7 July 2008 2:52:31 Elliott Hird wrote:
>> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to act on behalf of Agora to award a
>> win to every person.
>>
>> tusho
>>
>
> I support.
>
It won't work.
2008/7/8 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It won't work.
>
Urgh, hit submit before I wanted to.
It won't work because I'm not a player. When the proposal that
repeals acting on behalf of Agora passes, could someone do it again
the new way for me? Eternal luv offered <3
tusho
2008/7/8 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
>> On Monday 7 July 2008 2:52:31 Elliott Hird wrote:
>>> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to act on behalf of Agora to award a
>>> win to every person.
>
> I object. I ref
2008/7/8 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> Not every person can communicate by email, and besides, this can't happen
>> anyway
>
> It depends on whether you mean "can with eir email account" or &
101 - 200 of 1799 matches
Mail list logo
