2008/6/26 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > As I indicated previously, I don't mind minor corruption of the > judicial system through the Protection Racket, however I am not > interested in bringing down all the upstanding citizens of Agora upon > my head. I therefore invite ehird or notehird (whichever) to provide > some valid lines of reasoning that would make the case for overturning > past judicial precedent and ruling TRUE. > > BobTHJ >
You will be violating the Protection Racket if you don't judge TRUE. Also, 'ehird' is merely my old name, I am now 'notehird' (Quazie thankfully did this to escape me from the pledge that started all of this.) Anyway, I think it could be 'not envisioned'. I mean, obviously I was aware that it was *possible* that someone could deregister me, but I hoped (and believed) that it wouldn't happen - since anyone looking at it would realise it's not a novelty to discover it could be used to deregister me. I was hoping for things like what Murphy and ais523 did, those were what I envisioned. notehird
