On Friday 27 June 2008 2:32:56 Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Fair enough. I'm happy enough to be required to keep offering things
> for sale when I'm below 50, but if no one accepts even at the cheapest
> price after good faith effort, that shouldn't be a contract violation
> (or at least, it should be a m
>> Sounds good for the sell side, but I'd still like to see "I buy up to
>> X VP worth of votes in the obvious optimal fashion" refactored as well.
>
> Not quite sure how to make that one work. Care to take a stab at it?
I'm not sure about auto-optimization, but the current contract text
supports
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BobTHJ wrote:
>
>> "Casting a vote of SELL (X) on a proposal is equivalent to posting a
>> Sell Ticket with a cost of X and endorsing the filler of that Sell
>> Ticket."?
>
> Sounds good for the sell side, but I'd still like to
BobTHJ wrote:
> "Casting a vote of SELL (X) on a proposal is equivalent to posting a
> Sell Ticket with a cost of X and endorsing the filler of that Sell
> Ticket."?
Sounds good for the sell side, but I'd still like to see "I buy up to
X VP worth of votes in the obvious optimal fashion" refactore
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking personally, the more effort it takes, the less often anyone
> will bother. I suggest amending the Vote Market so that, instead of
> a three-step specific process:
>
> Alice> I offer to sell my vote on 6000 for 1 VP
>
> via clauses something like these:
>
> "I sell my vote on for " is equivalent to
> conditionally voting "endorsing the person (if any) who buys my vote;
> if they are not an eligible voter, then as they direct; if there is
> no such person, then no vote".
This is a good idea. The only thing
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is absurd. You've set up an impossible condition if no one's buying.
>> I state that the fact of no one being willing to buy even the cheapest
>> of votes is a state not envisioned by the contract, a
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> If you ask me Vote Market is finally starting to act as it was envisioned.
>>
>> Fair enough. I'm happy enough to be required to keep
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Alexander Smith wrote:
>> Goethe wrote:
>>> By the way, does OBLIGATED in all caps have any meaning other than
>>> the standard definition of the word (not in all-caps)? I can't find it.
>>> (This is
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> If you ask me Vote Market is finally starting to act as it was envisioned.
>
> Fair enough. I'm happy enough to be required to keep offering things
> for sale when I'm below 50, b
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Alexander Smith wrote:
> Goethe wrote:
>> By the way, does OBLIGATED in all caps have any meaning other than
>> the standard definition of the word (not in all-caps)? I can't find it.
>> (This isn't a prelude to trying to weasel out of anything, I'm just
>> curious if I'm mi
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> If you ask me Vote Market is finally starting to act as it was envisioned.
Fair enough. I'm happy enough to be required to keep offering things
for sale when I'm below 50, but if no one accepts even at the cheapest
price after good faith effort, that sho
Goethe wrote:
> By the way, does OBLIGATED in all caps have any meaning other than
> the standard definition of the word (not in all-caps)? I can't find it.
> (This isn't a prelude to trying to weasel out of anything, I'm just
> curious if I'm missing something somewhere).
I thought it was in M
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Actually, there has been more Vote Market activity in the past month
> then in the six months previously. There have certainly been
> opportunities to gain VP, and there presently exist at least 10 open
> tickets. Just not much of it has been for the buyin
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Actually, there has been more Vote Market activity in the past month
>> then in the six months previously. There have certainly been
>> opportunities to gain VP, and there presentl
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Actually, there has been more Vote Market activity in the past month
> then in the six months previously. There have certainly been
> opportunities to gain VP, and there presently exist at least 10 open
> tickets. Just not much of it has been for the buyin
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
On Thursday 26 June 2008 8:30:54 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
>>> On Thursday 26 June 2008 8:30:54 Kerim Aydin wrote:
Oh hey, comex! Want to do a back-and-forth for trade for free to get us
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
>> On Thursday 26 June 2008 8:30:54 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> Oh hey, comex! Want to do a back-and-forth for trade for free to get us
>>> both above the limit for an instant? We could d
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Thursday 26 June 2008 8:30:54 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Oh hey, comex! Want to do a back-and-forth for trade for free to get us
>> both above the limit for an instant? We could do that monthly as long
>> as our combo sums to 50. -Goethe
>
> How much do yo
On Thursday 26 June 2008 8:30:54 Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Oh hey, comex! Want to do a back-and-forth for trade for free to get us
> both above the limit for an instant? We could do that monthly as long
> as our combo sums to 50. -Goethe
How much do you two trust each other?
21 matches
Mail list logo
