Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2025-02-05 17:21]:
> Testing Discord RSS feed.
Wow what. Is there a digest one? This is interesting.
Also, I support any intents to declare Apathy.
--
juan
Testing Discord RSS feed.
This messages contains no game actions.
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor
ef139f68-d4c9-4c18-b408-575ea7a4dce7
From
>From
>>From
>From x
>From x
>>From x
I screwed up what I was trying to test the first time. Very sorry. I
hope this will be the last one.
I declare under penalty of No Faking that this message is not intended
as part of any scam or exploit.
~qenya
b0298f01-928c-4697-a3e4-ef011b6544d6
From
>From
>>From
Pardon the spam, I'm trying to debug a thing.
I declare under penalty of No Faking that this message is not intended
as part of any scam or exploit.
~qenya
Sorry, testing email setup.
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
Hello?
This message contains no game actions.
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On 4/11/23 15:44, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
I scheduled them to send at the exact same time (Test 1 before Test 2)
Ah interesting. My guess is that when you schedule the client sets the
Date to the scheduled time, even if it doesn't actually *send* at the
scheduled time. That
I scheduled them to send at the exact same time (Test 1 before Test 2)
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:40 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/11/23 15:00, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience
> The
On 4/11/23 15:00, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience
The time between your DATE and the first received on these messages
seems longer than your previous messages (or other players'). Did you
schedule these, or do something to the head
I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience
I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience
Just testing a filter.
--
nix
Herald
This message contains no game actions.
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
Jason wrote:
I intend, without objection, to intend, without objection, to declare
Apathy.
[G. suggested the archives went down on Discord.]
https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/2015/08/no-1973-1975.html
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:44 AM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to intend, without objection, to declare
> Apathy.
>
> [G. suggested the archives went down on Discord.]
>
> --
> Jason Cobb
>
> Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemaso
I intend, without objection, to intend, without objection, to declare
Apathy.
[G. suggested the archives went down on Discord.]
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
test
--
Falsifian
This message contains no game actions.
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
This is a test message and contains no actions.
Test, sorry for the spam. The list was down for about 7 hours today because I
messed something up while upgrading the server to be fully 64-bit. Sorry.
(i386 in 2020? Absurd!)
On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 18:41 +, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to figure out if the lists are quiet or
> down.
I support.
--
ais523
I intend, without objection, to figure out if the lists are quiet or down.
Gaelan
I intend, without objection, to determine whether the list is working again.
This is only a test. This message contains no game actions.
--
Jason Cobb
This message contains no game actions. This just a test to see if the
fora are working properly again.
-Aris
No doubt this message will spur a flurry of suspicion and precautionary
objections, but after being stuck with a temporary email client for a
month, my main email client has started working for receiving Agoran
email again.
I'm therefore hoping that it will also be currently capable of sending,
in
=Metareport=
This is the ADoP’s weekly report
Date of last report: 2020-06-21
Date of this report: 2020-06-28
MISCELLANEOUS INFO
--
Filled offices: 15/15 (100%)
Total officers: 10
Consolidation[1]: 1.5
Late reports: 0%
Playing around with KMail and the protonmail bridge.
---
Nch
1... 2... 3... testing.
-Aris
On 2/14/20 2:26 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 2/14/20 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if
>> it's only for that message.
>>
>> -- Jason Cobb
>
> Looks like it is, since I got this back (w/o failure notice).
>
Oh, just
On 2/14/20 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if
> it's only for that message.
>
> -- Jason Cobb
Looks like it is, since I got this back (w/o failure notice).
--
Jason Cobb
Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if
it's only for that message.
--
Jason Cobb
On 2/2/20 9:15 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:01 PM comex wrote:
>> Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone.
> ...except that didn't actually use Haraka because I sent from the
> wrong address. This time for real.
Received, if it helps.
--
Jason Cobb
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:01 PM comex wrote:
> Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone.
...except that didn't actually use Haraka because I sent from the
wrong address. This time for real.
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 5:11 PM comexk--- via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Nothing to see here, move along.
Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone.
Nothing to see here, move along.
my filters work differently if the subject is munged with "DIS"
etc. this is testing that part of the filter.
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019, omd wrote:
Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP?
Maybe this is a good time to remind you (you never responded to my
original message) that back in June/July (I think) I had trouble receiving
list email because the list IP got on a global spa
Never mind; I eventually got "Yeah ... I was trying" at 03:59 UTC.
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:52, James Cook wrote:
>
> I got "Testing my new address filter." but not "Yeah... I was trying
> to send from an unsubscribed address, ...".
>
>
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:49, Jason Cobb wrote:
> >
> >
I got "Testing my new address filter." but not "Yeah... I was trying
to send from an unsubscribed address, ...".
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:49, Jason Cobb wrote:
>
> On 12/22/19 10:35 PM, Nicholas Allegra wrote:
>
> I received this, but not Falsifian's reply nor the one that says
> "Testing my ne
On 12/22/19 10:34 PM, omd wrote:
Testing my new address filter.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 3:25 PM omd wrote:
Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP?
Sorry, just received this; disregard my previous message.
--
Jason Cobb
On 12/22/19 10:35 PM, Nicholas Allegra wrote:
I received this, but not Falsifian's reply nor the one that says
"Testing my new address filter."
--
Jason Cobb
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 7:37 PM James Cook wrote:
> I got this one.
Yeah... I was trying to send from an unsubscribed address, but I
didn't realize that when sending from an alias, Gmail would keep my
normal address in the envelope. Whoops.
I got this one.
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:36, Nicholas Allegra wrote:
>
>
--
- Falsifian
Testing my new address filter.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 3:25 PM omd wrote:
>
> Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP?
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 at 23:25, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 12/22/19 6:24 PM, omd wrote:
> > Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP?
>
> Received.
>
> --
> Jason Cobb
I got both these messages, but GMail attached the note "This message
was not sent to Spam because of a filter
On 12/22/19 6:24 PM, omd wrote:
Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP?
Received.
--
Jason Cobb
Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP?
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 10:58 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
wrote:
> This is a test of what happens if I don't add "DIS:" to the subject
> line ahead of time.
I received this (and the a-b and a-o versions too). The mailing list
rewrote the "From:" line in order to prevent a DMARC mismatc
This is a test of what happens if I don't add "DIS:" to the subject line
ahead of time.
test
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
third time's the charm (or not)
Actually I was testing if my new email was subscribed correctly (yes,
obviously), and if my filters put the returning message in the right place
(no they didn't, but I'll try to minimize tests to fix that).
On 12/28/2018 8:42 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
I received this, if that's what you we
I received this, if that's what you were trying to test.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, December 28, 2018 4:24 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> testing new email filters
testing new email filters
I messed around with some settings and now it is working properly.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:56 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing
> characters actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the
> rest of you?
>
> -tw
needs an explicit declaration of monospace typestyle:
[image: needs monospace.PNG]
Here it is in monospace, gmail's "fixed width" option:
> ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐
> │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│
> ├───
Looks sharp/nice/correct to me.
With the usual exception of that Japanese line (but it's less out-of-line
then other reports have been).
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing
> characters
> actually have wide supp
Hmm. Perhaps an experiment to shelve for the time being. 🤔
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On July 16, 2018 3:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
>
>
> =E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=
>
> =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2
=E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=
=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=
=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=
=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=9
I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing characters
actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the rest of you?
-twg
┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐
│Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Pap
Testing server.
-Aris
*HTML preformatted style, perhaps?*
*+---++++---+++++++
*
*|Entity
|Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs| *
*+---++++---+++++++
*
*|ATMunn
Why... How do you all make the tables???
(Let me try reposting Gaelan's previous report)
+---++++---++++++
|*Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|
*+---+++---
Testing the tables
+---++++---+++++++
|Entity
|Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs|
+---++++---+++++++
|ATMunn | 10| 35| 0| 0|
My nickname: dragging Agora to like 1992 in terms of internationalization
of its encoding.
天火狐
On 22 November 2017 at 19:59, ATMunn wrote:
> Yeah, I've noticed this as well, it happens in my text editor as well. I
> tend to go with the approach of having the | be in the same column.
>
>
> On 11
Yeah, I've noticed this as well, it happens in my text editor as well. I tend
to go with the approach of having the | be in the same column.
On 11/22/2017 7:56 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote:
Telnaior|
天火狐 |
Trigon |
Telnaior|
天火
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 19:57 Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote:
> > > Telnaior|
> > > 天火狐 |
> > > Trigon |
> >
> > > Telnaior|
> > > 天火狐 |
> > > Trigon |
> >
> > > Telnaior|
> > > 天火狐 |
> > > Trigon |
>
> According
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote:
> > Telnaior|
> > 天火狐 |
> > Trigon |
>
> > Telnaior|
> > 天火狐 |
> > Trigon |
>
> > Telnaior|
> > 天火狐 |
> > Trigon |
According to the Unicode standards, the vast majority of Japanese
characters (whiche
| Telnaior |
| 天火狐 |
| Trigon |
| Telnaior |
| 天火狐 |
| Trigon |
| Telnaior |
| 天火狐 |
| Trigon |
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam?
>
> It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at least with
> respect to sending. If this message gets through, presumably others
> will too.
I did not receive this.
(I k
me too.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> I received this.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>> On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>>
>> Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing sc
I received this.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam?
>
> It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at least with
> respect to sending
Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam?
It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at least with
respect to sending. If this message gets through, presumably others
will too.
--
ais523
Yeah, that was the thing I wanted to try to exploit. Unfortunately SLR and
other stuff are not self-ratifying like other reports.
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 at 09:39, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > On Sep 18, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> >
> > This worries me. Is there something in the SLR tha
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that
> your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing.
>
> Gaelan
The “Estate Auctions” rule is missing a paragraph, I believe.
-o
signature.asc
Descri
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > test
>
> This concludes our test of the emergency scam response system.
>
> Had this been an actual working scam, it probably wouldn't have
> involved CuddleBeam
I refer the interested student
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> test
This concludes our test of the emergency scam response system.
Had this been an actual working scam, it probably wouldn't have
involved CuddleBeam.
Auctions became unregulated. It was just "an auction" and such. Presumably
I could just make my own.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given
>> that your scam do
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given
that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing.
The last paragraph of rule 2491 is duplicated. I don't see how that allows
any scam though...
Greetings,
Ørjan.
This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that
your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing.
Gaelan
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> I don't have any email problems fortunately. I was trying to pull a scam
> which relied on timi
I don't have any email problems fortunately. I was trying to pull a scam
which relied on timing and I wanted to see what time appeared on the
archives for my message to compare with a-o.
Sorry for any concerns.
Also, my scam didn't work because the SLR isn't self-ratifying and now I
cry in a corn
The implication that Cuddlebeam sending this email suggested e might be having
email problems.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>
> I received it too (but already deleted it, after briefly seeing if I
I received it too (but already deleted it, after briefly seeing if I could
spot anything funny in the headers but I didn't), what's wrong with it?
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I a
I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am slightly
concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> test
signature.asc
De
Uh oh.
-Aris
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:22 PM Cuddle Beam wrote:
> test
>
test
Would it be better if I write the subject tags myself?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote:
> > Is this working?
>
> It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's posts are, and no matter
>
On 05/20/2017 08:50 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote:
Is this working?
It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's posts are, and no matter
how many I mark as "not spam" it keeps happening.
I distinctly remember having this problem a while back with
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
> I use it too, but nearly exclusively through a desktop client. Maybe it's a
> problem with the web client?
>
>
Nope. I mostly use the web client.
-Aris
On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote:
> Is this working?
It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's posts are, and no matter
how many I mark as "not spam" it keeps happening.
I can unstick them manually, but finding a long-term solution to this
might well be helpful. (The DKIM s
I use it too, but nearly exclusively through a desktop client. Maybe
it's a problem with the web client?
On 05/20/2017 08:27 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:09 PM, CuddleBeam wrote:
I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it finally works
lol, holy fuck.
K
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:09 PM, CuddleBeam wrote:
> I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it finally works
> lol, holy fuck.
>
> Kudos to PSS btw, he helped me out. Straight up gmail doesn't work
> apparently but they taught me the googlemail.com trick and it works and I'm
> sup
I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it finally works
lol, holy fuck.
Kudos to PSS btw, he helped me out. Straight up gmail doesn't work
apparently but they taught me the googlemail.com trick and it works and I'm
super grateful.
Yeah, I noticed, but I didn't want to point it out.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, it should probably be ita vero. It's kind of scary how long I've
> been doing that wrong.
>
> -Aris
>
>
Actually, it should probably be ita vero. It's kind of scary how long I've
been doing that wrong.
-Aris
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:15 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Yes. I appreciate the Latin.
>
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
Yes. I appreciate the Latin.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeam
> wrote:
>
>> Is this working?
>>
>> Ita vera.
>
> -Aris
>
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeam
wrote:
> Is this working?
>
> Ita vera.
-Aris
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
