Re: DIS: another uh-oh

2008-11-28 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 03:40 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> Uh, do the second and third paragraphs of R1607 actually sufficiently >> imply that the Promoter CAN in fact distribute a proposal? -G. > Ugh, no they don't, as far as I can tell. A good thing that p

Re: DIS: another uh-oh

2008-11-28 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 03:40 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Uh, do the second and third paragraphs of R1607 actually sufficiently > imply that the Promoter CAN in fact distribute a proposal? -G. Ugh, no they don't, as far as I can tell. A good thing that purported proposal results are self-ratifying;

Re: DIS: another uh-oh

2008-11-28 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Uh, do the second and third paragraphs of R1607 actually sufficiently > imply that the Promoter CAN in fact distribute a proposal? -G. I think so; this seems like the same thing as "X SHALL Y by announcement", except the

DIS: another uh-oh

2008-11-28 Thread Kerim Aydin
Uh, do the second and third paragraphs of R1607 actually sufficiently imply that the Promoter CAN in fact distribute a proposal? -G.