Yeah, this was what I was thinking of - I remembered things not working because
of that specific prohibition, and confused that with it _only_ being possible
for by-announcement actions.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, July 13, 2019 11:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Which
Which precedent? "just making a post" is explicitly disallowed in R2466:
> A person CANNOT act
> on behalf of another person to do anything except perform a game
> action; in particular, a person CANNOT act on behalf of another
>
You cannot make a post on behalf of a zombie to a public forum; it is
explicitly forbidden my the acting on behalf rule.
-Aris
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 5:56 PM Rebecca wrote:
> by precedent you can do anything like that on behalf of a zombie including
> just making a post to a public forum
>
> O
by precedent you can do anything like that on behalf of a zombie including
just making a post to a public forum
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:28 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I just noticed that, according to R2579/0:
>
> To perform a fee-based action, an entity (the Actor) who is
> othe
The acting on behalf rule is intended to generally specify that an
announcement on behalf of someone is treated like an announcement by that
person. Do you know of some reason that might not work?
-Aris
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 5:28 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I just noticed that, according to
I just noticed that, according to R2579/0:
To perform a fee-based action, an entity (the Actor) who is
otherwise permitted to perform the action must announce that e is
performing the action; the announcement must specify the correct
set of assets for the fee and indicate i
6 matches
Mail list logo
