The acting on behalf rule is intended to generally specify that an announcement on behalf of someone is treated like an announcement by that person. Do you know of some reason that might not work?
-Aris On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 5:28 PM Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote: > I just noticed that, according to R2579/0: > > To perform a fee-based action, an entity (the Actor) who is > otherwise permitted to perform the action must announce that e is > performing the action; the announcement must specify the correct > set of assets for the fee and indicate intent to pay that fee for > the sole purpose of performing the action. > > If the Actor is a zombie, e is not actually the one making an > announcement. So does this mean zombie masters can't make their zombies > perform fee-based actions at all? This seems like a bit of an oversight if > true. Or am I overlooking something? > > -twg >
