Yeah, this was what I was thinking of - I remembered things not working because of that specific prohibition, and confused that with it _only_ being possible for by-announcement actions.
-twg ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Saturday, July 13, 2019 11:31 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > > > Which precedent? "just making a post" is explicitly disallowed in R2466: > > > A person CANNOT act > > > > > on behalf of another person to do anything except perform a game > > > > > action; in particular, a person CANNOT act on behalf of another > > > > > person to send a message, only to perform specific actions that > > > > > might be taken within a message. > > > > On 7/13/2019 3:01 PM, Rebecca wrote: > > > by precedent you can do anything like that on behalf of a zombie including > > just making a post to a public forum > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:28 AM Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red wrote: > > > > > I just noticed that, according to R2579/0: > > > > > > To perform a fee-based action, an entity (the Actor) who is > > > otherwise permitted to perform the action must announce that e is > > > performing the action; the announcement must specify the correct > > > set of assets for the fee and indicate intent to pay that fee for > > > the sole purpose of performing the action. > > > > > > > > > If the Actor is a zombie, e is not actually the one making an > > > announcement. So does this mean zombie masters can't make their zombies > > > perform fee-based actions at all? This seems like a bit of an oversight if > > > true. Or am I overlooking something? > > > -twg
