Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-22 Thread Taral
Bravo! On 10/22/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > comex wrote: > >Perhaps not, but having more Patent Titles can never be a bad thing. > > I hereby submit the following proposal titled "famous last words": > > {{{ > > Award comex the patent title "Sorceror's Apprentice". > > }}} > > -zefram

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-22 Thread comex
On 10/22/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should we really be encouraging speed-judging? Many CFJs merit better > treatment than that. Perhaps not, but having more Patent Titles can never be a bad thing.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-22 Thread Ian Kelly
On 10/22/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Proto: > > Fastest Judge In Agora. > > Create a new rule titled "Fastest Judge In Agora" to read as follows: > > There shall be a Patent title known as the "The Fastest Judge In > Agora". Which may only be held by one player at a time. It is awarded

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-22 Thread Zefram
Peekee wrote: >Create a new rule titled "Fastest Judge In Agora" to read as follows: Better add a "since the beginning of 2007" or similar time limit. CFJ records are incomplete. -zefram

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-22 Thread Peekee
Proto: Fastest Judge In Agora. Create a new rule titled "Fastest Judge In Agora" to read as follows: There shall be a Patent title known as the "The Fastest Judge In Agora". Which may only be held by one player at a time. It is awarded to a Judge who judges a CFJ quicker than any previous r

DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-22 Thread Kerim Aydin
Murphy wrote: >> Ed Murphy wrote: >>> Measured from assignment, though, the record is 0 s (set or at least >>> tied by some CFJ earlier this month, in which you assigned it to >>> yourself and judged it in a single message). >> >> I don't recall doing such a thing, and I can't find it in my files

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-21 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: Measured from assignment, though, the record is 0 s (set or at least tied by some CFJ earlier this month, in which you assigned it to yourself and judged it in a single message). I don't recall doing such a thing, and I can't find it in my files. Neither can I

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-21 Thread Josiah Worcester
On Sunday 21 October 2007 17:06:38 Zefram wrote: > Josiah Worcester wrote: > >I suggest calling a CFJ on "This CFJ is the shortest one in Agoran > >history.". ;) > > It would only end up being appealed. > > -zefram > So assign yourself, amending that this is also the shortest *appeal* ever. ;

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-21 Thread Zefram
Josiah Worcester wrote: >I suggest calling a CFJ on "This CFJ is the shortest one in Agoran >history.". ;) It would only end up being appealed. -zefram

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-21 Thread Zefram
comex wrote: >If you want to set a record, have the Pineapple Partnership call a CFJ, >assign it to yourself, and judge it all in the same message. Heh. But I don't want to set such a meaningless record. I'm much more interested in how fast our regular processes work, where initiator, CotC, and

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-21 Thread Josiah Worcester
On Sunday 21 October 2007 16:56:38 comex wrote: > If you want to set a record, have the Pineapple Partnership call a CFJ, > assign it to yourself, and judge it all in the same message. > I suggest calling a CFJ on "This CFJ is the shortest one in Agoran history.". ;)

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-21 Thread comex
On Sunday 21 October 2007, Zefram wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: > >Measured from assignment, though, the record is 0 s (set or at least > >tied by some CFJ earlier this month, in which you assigned it to > >yourself and judged it in a single message). > I don't recall doing such a thing, and I can't fi

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-21 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: >Measured from assignment, though, the record is 0 s (set or at least >tied by some CFJ earlier this month, in which you assigned it to >yourself and judged it in a single message). I don't recall doing such a thing, and I can't find it in my files. -zefram

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-21 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: == CFJ 1767 == Initiated by pikhq: 21 Oct 2007 19:53:50 GMT Judge Goddess Eris assigned:21 Oct 2007 20:01:35 GMT Judged FALSE by Goddess Eris: 21 Oct 2007 20:04:29 GMT I suspect th

DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE

2007-10-21 Thread Zefram
>== CFJ 1767 == >Initiated by pikhq: 21 Oct 2007 19:53:50 GMT >Judge Goddess Eris assigned:21 Oct 2007 20:01:35 GMT >Judged FALSE by Goddess Eris: 21 Oct 2007 20:04:29 GMT I suspect that this is our