On Sun, 2014-11-09 at 11:28 -0700, Sprocklem wrote:
> On 2014-11-09 01:16, Alex Smith wrote:
> >ROGCBMUVIPLWK
> > araneaC W
> > Sprocklem C
>
> > 04/11/14 aranea+W (new to Ribbons)
> > 04/11/14 aranea+C (deputizing for Tailor)
> > 06/11/14 Sprocklem +W (new to
On 2014-11-09 01:16, Alex Smith wrote:
>ROGCBMUVIPLWK
> araneaC W
> Sprocklem C
> 04/11/14 aranea+W (new to Ribbons)
> 04/11/14 aranea+C (deputizing for Tailor)
> 06/11/14 Sprocklem +W (new to Ribbons)
These two parts don't agree with each other. (Hint: I sho
> On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 20:35 +0100, Luis Ressel wrote:
> This is a list of all persons with Ribbons, and which ribbons they have:
Random thought:
1. In the Herald's report, all "wins" since 2001 have basically been
under Champion.
2. In the elder days, there were some distinctive othe
On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 08:16:59 +
Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 20:35 +0100, Luis Ressel wrote:
> > I deputize for the Tailor to publish his report:
>
> Was this just to snipe the Ribbon, or do you want the office more
> generally?
>
> I'd be willing to take Tailor (although I'm pl
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 20:35 +0100, Luis Ressel wrote:
> I deputize for the Tailor to publish his report:
Was this just to snipe the Ribbon, or do you want the office more
generally?
I'd be willing to take Tailor (although I'm planning a certain large
proposal that will need an officer, and may ne
5 matches
Mail list logo