DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2488 assigned to root

2009-05-04 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2488 > > ===  CFJ 2488 (Interest Index = 2)   > >    The prohibition on excessive Notices of Violation in rule 2230 >    is ineffective due to rule 101

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2488 assigned to root

2009-05-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 4 May 2009, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 14:26 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote: >>> === CFJ 2488 (Interest Index = 2) >>> >>> The prohibition on excessive Notices of Violation in rule 2230 >>> is ineffective due to rule 101 >>> >>> =

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2488 assigned to root

2009-05-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 4 May 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote: >> === CFJ 2488 (Interest Index = 2) >> >> The prohibition on excessive Notices of Violation in rule 2230 >> is ineffective due to rule 101 >> >> ==

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2488 assigned to root

2009-05-04 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 14:26 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote: > > === CFJ 2488 (Interest Index = 2) > > > > The prohibition on excessive Notices of Violation in rule 2230 > > is ineffective due to rule 101 > > > >

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2488 assigned to root

2009-05-04 Thread Benjamin Caplan
> === CFJ 2488 (Interest Index = 2) > > The prohibition on excessive Notices of Violation in rule 2230 > is ineffective due to rule 101 > > We had this argument back when exces