> ===================  CFJ 2488 (Interest Index = 2)  ====================
> 
>     The prohibition on excessive Notices of Violation in rule 2230
>     is ineffective due to rule 101
> 
> ========================================================================
We had this argument back when excess CFJs were first introduced,
regarding 101(ii), the right to CFJ. I believe the consensus on the DF
was that it could take precedence in the right circumstances (ie, there
were >N genuine controversies that couldn't wait until next week), but
that the circumstances in which there was a genuine conflict would very
seldom come up.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to