On Jun 26, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
So I envisioned that people would probably consider it, but I
didn't envision
that someone actually did it. That said, after the event I wasn't
suprised that
it was comex who did it.
You should have
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> BobTHJ wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2047
== CFJ 204
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BobTHJ wrote:
>
>>> Anyway, I think it could be 'not envisioned'. I mean, obviously I was
>>> aware that it was
>>> *possible* that someone could deregister me, but I hoped (and
>>> believed) that it wouldn't
>>> happen - sinc
BobTHJ wrote:
>> Anyway, I think it could be 'not envisioned'. I mean, obviously I was
>> aware that it was
>> *possible* that someone could deregister me, but I hoped (and
>> believed) that it wouldn't
>> happen - since anyone looking at it would realise it's not a novelty
>> to discover it could
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BobTHJ wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2047
>>>
>>> == CFJ 2047
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2047
>>
>> == CFJ 2047 ==
>>
>>notehird is a registered player.
>>
>> ===
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/26 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> As I indicated previously, I don't mind minor corruption of the
>> judicial system through the Protection Racket, however I am not
>> interested in bringing down all the upstandi
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> So I envisioned that people would probably consider it, but I didn't envision
> that someone actually did it. That said, after the event I wasn't suprised
> that
> it was comex who did it.
You should have envisioned that comex would have envisioned that
2008/6/26 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gratuitous: my first thought was: "I should deregister em. Naw, that's
> boring." But the fact that it was (apparently) the first thought of
> many who read it might mean it should have been envisioned as likely.
> -Goethe.
>
I didn't envision that i
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> Anyway, I think it could be 'not envisioned'. I mean, obviously I was
> aware that it was
> *possible* that someone could deregister me, but I hoped (and
> believed) that it wouldn't
> happen - since anyone looking at it would realise it's not a novelty
2008/6/26 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As I indicated previously, I don't mind minor corruption of the
> judicial system through the Protection Racket, however I am not
> interested in bringing down all the upstanding citizens of Agora upon
> my head. I therefore invite ehird or notehird (whi
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2047
>
> == CFJ 2047 ==
>
>notehird is a registered player.
>
> ===
12 matches
Mail list logo
