On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BobTHJ wrote: > >>> Anyway, I think it could be 'not envisioned'. I mean, obviously I was >>> aware that it was >>> *possible* that someone could deregister me, but I hoped (and >>> believed) that it wouldn't >>> happen - since anyone looking at it would realise it's not a novelty >>> to discover it could >>> be used to deregister me. I was hoping for things like what Murphy and >>> ais523 did, those >>> were what I envisioned. >>> >> >> While it may not be what you envisioned this is not an equity case it >> is a inquiry case. I don't think I can rule on that basis. > > And even if an equity case were initiated, the equation couldn't do > anything to allow ehird to re-register ahead of the usual 30-day limit. > >> Essentially, I'm asking that you provide an argument that would allow >> me to rule TRUE on this case and have that be considered an acceptable >> judgment....otherwise I am inclined to attempt to de-Protect this >> case. > > This attitude is not worthy of the phrase "corrupt the judicial system", > but is in fact precisely equivalent to my earlier suggestion "monetize > the choice between multiple plausible interpretations". Call it the > Interpretation Market if that's what you're after. > Allow me to clarify...
I know I walk a thin line with the Protection Racket agreement. Several players (yourself included) have made it clear that they will oppose any attempts at corrupting the judicial system. I personally don't have a problem with said corruption (to some extent) and the Protection Racket agreement is in existence for those cases where I or one of the other Dons deems a case to be "worth the risk". However, I don't think this particular case is worth the risk, since ehird directly brought this trouble upon emself. Therefore, unless e (or someone else) can provide me a reasonable interpretation that would lead to the desired outcome I will move to de-Protect this case (if Ivan Hope is in agreement with me). I don't want to gamble my status within Agora on this case....but there are other cases that I might want to do so. BobTHJ
