DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Repealment proposals

2009-04-17 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/4/17 Jonatan Kilhamn : > Proposal: Rule Change Anarchy > (AI=3, Disinterested) > > Repeal Rule 105 (Rule Changes). FOR

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Repealment proposals

2009-03-23 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Alex Smith wrote: > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 19:35 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn >>>> Repeal Rule 104 (First Speaker). >>> >>> N! >> Doesn't that rule serve no

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Repealment proposals

2009-03-23 Thread comex
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> I'm going to vote FOR. The ruleset needs to be simplified. > > Based on the above:  I am the winner there are no rules. I initiate an equity case with the rules as contract, the players as the parties to the contract, and Pe

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Repealment proposals

2009-03-23 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/3/23 Aaron Goldfein : > I'm going to vote FOR. The ruleset needs to be simplified. I'm going to pray for your soul. It needs cleansing.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Repealment proposals

2009-03-23 Thread Ed Murphy
Yally wrote: > I'm going to vote FOR. The ruleset needs to be simplified. Based on the above: I am the winner there are no rules.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Repealment proposals

2009-03-23 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/3/23 Alex Smith : > > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 19:35 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn > >> wrote: > >> 2009/3/22 Alex Smith : > >> > >> > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Repealment proposals

2009-03-23 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
2009/3/23 Alex Smith : > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 19:35 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn >> wrote: >>         2009/3/22 Alex Smith : >> >>         > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: >>         >> The following proposal is made a

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Repealment proposals

2009-03-23 Thread Alex Smith
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 19:35 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: > 2009/3/22 Alex Smith : > > > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > >> The following proposal is made as a part of the Anarch

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Repealment proposals

2009-03-22 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/3/23 Aaron Goldfein : > Doesn't that rule serve no purpose anyway? How dare you!

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Repealment proposals

2009-03-22 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/3/22 Alex Smith : > > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > >> The following proposal is made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly > >> duties. > >> Date of this message: Sun 22 Mar 09 > >> Date of last fulfilment

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Repealment proposals

2009-03-22 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
2009/3/22 Alex Smith : > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: >> The following proposal is made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly >> duties. >> Date of this message: Sun 22 Mar 09 >> Date of last fulfilment of these duties: Sat 14 Mar 09 >> >> Proposal: Speaker Anarchy >> (AI

DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Repealment proposals

2009-03-22 Thread Alex Smith
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > The following proposal is made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly > duties. > Date of this message: Sun 22 Mar 09 > Date of last fulfilment of these duties: Sat 14 Mar 09 > > Proposal: Speaker Anarchy > (AI=3, Disinterested) > > Repeal