On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 2009/3/23 Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk>: > > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 19:35 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn > >> <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2009/3/22 Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk>: > >> > >> > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > >> >> The following proposal is made as a part of the Anarchist's > >> weekly > >> >> duties. > >> >> Date of this message: Sun 22 Mar 09 > >> >> Date of last fulfilment of these duties: Sat 14 Mar 09 > >> >> > >> >> Proposal: Speaker Anarchy > >> >> (AI=3, Disinterested) > >> >> > >> >> Repeal Rule 104 (First Speaker). > >> > > >> > NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! > >> > > >> > -- > >> > ais523 > >> > > >> > >> Funny thing is, this time it was actually the dice that chose > >> it. You > >> guys get this proposal now and again by people who aren't the > >> anarchist, right? > >> > >> Doesn't that rule serve no purpose anyway? > > Any attempt to change it will be met by anger and wrath (well, OK, maybe > > just AGAINST votes) from the long-standing players. The point is it's > > the only rule from the original ruleset that's survived amendment ever > > since the start of Agora. Not doing anything is actually helpful to help > > it maintain that status. > > > > -- > > ais523 > > > I'm not saying I want to remove it, it just seemed better to go > Anarchist on that one than on any of the others the dice returned, > since they were the kind of rules that would be kept just to make sure > everything didn't break down. I'm going to vote FOR. The ruleset needs to be simplified.
