Re: DIS: Re: BUS: gggrumble

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Any player CAN, with notice, declare war on any other > player by announcement. Any player CAN make peace... Is it clear enough to everyone that "declaring" and "making" flips the switch? (It's pretty obvious but maybe not to the Agoran pedant). > wi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: gggrumble

On 25 April 2011 05:28, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Proto: War > > Hostility is a switch for subsets of players of size 2, with values peace > (default) and war. Any player CAN, with notice, declare war on any other > player by announcement. Any player CAN make peace with any other player with > that

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: gggrumble

Yally wrote: > Any player CAN, with notice, declare war on any > other player by announcement. "by announcement" should be removed; it's already part of the dependent-action framework. > Whenever a player gains any points, a > number of points equal to the number of points e just gained divided

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: gggrumble

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 00:56, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 11-04-25 12:28 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > >> I declare war on scshunt. >> >> Proto: War >> >> Hostility is a switch for subsets of players of size 2, with values peace >> (default) and war. Any player CAN, with notice, declare war on any other

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: gggrumble

On 11-04-25 12:28 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: I declare war on scshunt. Proto: War Hostility is a switch for subsets of players of size 2, with values peace (default) and war. Any player CAN, with notice, declare war on any other player by announcement. Any player CAN make peace with any other

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: gggrumble

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Proto: War FOR

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: gggrumble

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 00:13, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 11-04-25 12:02 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > >> Isn't this all moot anyway? Your reduced salaries proposal is probably >> going to pass, and then the Assessor's salary will be 6 regardless of what >> happens with this. >> > -1 for reading comprehe

DIS: Re: BUS: gggrumble

ehird wrote: > On second thoughts I retract my objection. Did that stop being a thing > that is possible? No. Rule 2124 (Agoran Satisfaction), excerpt: A Supporter of a dependent action is an eligible entity who has publicly posted (and not withdrawn) support (syn. "consent") for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: gggrumble

On 11-04-25 12:02 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: Isn't this all moot anyway? Your reduced salaries proposal is probably going to pass, and then the Assessor's salary will be 6 regardless of what happens with this. -1 for reading comprehension; the other one was a series of intents, not a proposal.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: gggrumble

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 00:00, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 11-04-24 11:42 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > >> True, but I'm also not the Assessor and don't look to be it anytime soon. >> So, I should oppose any measure which grants power to my opponents. >> > His salary is already 15. > > Failure to follow t

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: gggrumble

On 11-04-24 11:42 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: True, but I'm also not the Assessor and don't look to be it anytime soon. So, I should oppose any measure which grants power to my opponents. His salary is already 15. Failure to follow the game grants power to your opponents. -scshutn

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: gggrumble

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 23:28, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 11-04-24 11:10 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 23:05, Sean Hunt wrote: > >> I intend, without two objections or with Agoran Consent, to set the Weekly >> Salary of the Assessor to 12. >> >> -scshunt >> > > I object. >

DIS: Re: BUS: gggrumble

On 11-04-24 11:10 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 23:05, Sean Hunt > wrote: I intend, without two objections or with Agoran Consent, to set the Weekly Salary of the Assessor to 12. -scshunt I object. Note that this is just a