On 13 December 2011 16:38, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> On 13 December 2011 14:51, Tanner Swett wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
>>> wrote:
Are you... trolling?
>>>
>>> Well, are you humaning?
>>>
>>> adiosTo
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 14:51, Tanner Swett wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
>> wrote:
>>> Are you... trolling?
>>
>> Well, are you humaning?
>>
>> adiosToreador
>
> Touché. Which universe is this again?
What makes
On 13 December 2011 14:51, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> On 12 December 2011 22:42, Tanner Swett wrote:
>>>
>>> (…)
>>>
>>> —Tavros *cough* Nitram
>>
>> Are you... trolling?
>
> Well, are you humaning?
>
> adiosToreador
Touché. Which universe
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> On 12 December 2011 22:42, Tanner Swett wrote:
>>
>> (…)
>>
>> —Tavros *cough* Nitram
>
> Are you... trolling?
Well, are you humaning?
adiosToreador
On 12 December 2011 22:42, Tanner Swett wrote:
>
> (…)
>
> —Tavros *cough* Nitram
Are you... trolling?
– (got) Tiger
Tanner Swett wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Tanner Swett wrote:
The last sentence, in parentheses, might not be a great idea. Without
it, we have to say "I extend the deadline" whenever someone calls a
case, which is easy enough; with it, every CFJ that is only margi
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Tanner Swett wrote:
>> The last sentence, in parentheses, might not be a great idea. Without
>> it, we have to say "I extend the deadline" whenever someone calls a
>> case, which is easy enough; with it, every CFJ that is only marginally
>> relev
Tanner Swett wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Proposal: Okay, that worked once a long time ago
(AI = 1.7)
Amend Rule 2343 (Victory Conditions) by inserting this paragraph after
the second paragraph:
The remainder of this rule notwithstanding, if an event's Vict
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal: Okay, that worked once a long time ago
> (AI = 1.7)
>
> Amend Rule 2343 (Victory Conditions) by inserting this paragraph after
> the second paragraph:
>
> The remainder of this rule notwithstanding, if an event's Victory
> De
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Rodlen wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Rodlen
> Date: Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:44 PM
> Subject: Re: BUS: Win by Paradox
> To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
>> Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> > This post is a win announcement. CFJ 2543, as ruled by H. Judge BobTHJ,
>> > is a tortoise and has been so continuously for the previous two weeks,
>> > b
2009/5/12 Geoffrey Spear :
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:12 PM, comex wrote:
>> This is a Win Announcement: Wooble has a Medal.
>
> I don't mind winning twice; I just wasn't 100% convinced I actually
> have a medal.
>
Couldn't the medal one have waited? Now I have to talk BobTHJ into
giving me point
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:12 PM, comex wrote:
> This is a Win Announcement: Wooble has a Medal.
I don't mind winning twice; I just wasn't 100% convinced I actually
have a medal.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 14:33, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a win announcement. I have at least 100 points.
>
> (This is ineffective if Pavitra already won. It is also ineffective
> if Pavitra didn't already win, but one or more other players also have
> at least 100 points. H.
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Meanwhile, I CFJ on the following criminal case:
>> Pikhq has violated 2019 by failing to assign prerogatives for
>> August 2008 in a timely fashion before August 1.
>
> Crimi
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Meanwhile, I CFJ on the following criminal case:
> Pikhq has violated 2019 by failing to assign prerogatives for
> August 2008 in a timely fashion before August 1.
Criminal CFJs now require 2 support.
Goethe wrote:
> I seriously recommend exile here. Pikhq activated emself and
> nearly a month ago offered to make the assignments, and eir
> failure to do so despite clear acknolwedgement of being informed
> has blockaded prerogatives due to eir inactivity. Exile is the
> only way to rotate t
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 11:25 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> This is a Win Announcement. ais523 has satisfied the winning condition
> of High Score as eir present score is 112.
>
> BobTHJ
Aargh, I miscounted. At least I underestimated my score rather than
overestimating it... Thanks for doing the annou
2008/8/28 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is a Win Announcement. ais523 has satisfied the winning condition
> of High Score as eir present score is 112.
>
> BobTHJ
>
Haha, he was planning that but I bet he wasn't expecting this. >:)
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 12:03 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:49 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:36 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> I issue 4 sell tickets:
> >>
> >> Action: Goethe will award MwoP Titles such that, among those winning
> >> b
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:49 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:36 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I issue 4 sell tickets:
>>
>> Action: Goethe will award MwoP Titles such that, among those winning
>> by extortion on or about July 7, you will be among the last
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Zefram wrote:
> Sgeo wrote:
>> With Agoran Consent, I act on behalf of Agora to award myself and all
>> supporters a Win.
>
> I believe this is ineffective for lack of specificity. Specifically,
> the announcement of intent was not specific about to whom wins were to
> be awar
2008/7/8 Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If this works, I suggest the Herald record these wins as by Bandwagon.
>
> Pavitra
>
I second this motion. (Only one more support needed!)
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, hey. Anyone else want to support after the fact? Because I CFJ on the
> following statement:
>
> Goethe won by extortion on or about June 7, 2008.
I think you mean July 7.
> Arguments:
>
> The way Support and
2008/7/8 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Pending CFJ :)
Oi, Protection Racket!
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2008/7/8 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> words
>
> AWESOME.
>
> I support all of Sgeo's attempts to award wins on behalf of Agora.
>
> I just won :3
Pending CFJ :)
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The following players have met the Win condition of Win by Extortion:
>> Sgeo
>> ais523
>> ihope
>> Olipro
>> cctoide
>> root
>>
>
> Me too!
>
> You also paid Goethe 7VP to support but decla
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Corrected win announcement:
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The following players have met the Win condition of Win by
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following players have met the Win condition of Win by Extortion:
> Sgeo
> ais523
> ihope
> Olipro
> cctoide
> root
>
Me too!
You also paid Goethe 7VP to support but declared your win before e had
the chance to do so.
BobTHJ
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:52 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> With Agoran Consent, I act on behalf of Agora to award a win to myself
>> and all persons who support my acting on behalf of Agora in this way.
>
> I support.
>
>
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> With Agoran Consent, I act on behalf of Agora to award a win to myself
>> and all persons who support my acting on behalf of Agora in this way.
>
> You can't,
Sgeo wrote:
> With Agoran Consent, I act on behalf of Agora to award a win to myself
> and all persons who support my acting on behalf of Agora in this way.
Doesn't work that way, you have to declare intent first. (This could
be interpreted as an implicit declaration of intent.)
Goethe wrote:
> This following is a win announcement: My nickname is Goethe!
*checks* It is. It doesn't cause you to satisfy any Win Conditions,
though.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> With Agoran Consent, I act on behalf of Agora to award a win to myself
>> and all persons who support my acting on behalf of Agora in this way.
>>
>
> I object.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With Agoran Consent, I act on behalf of Agora to award a win to myself
> and all persons who support my acting on behalf of Agora in this way.
>
I object. I also object to others supporting this.
I submit the following proposal '
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This following is a win announcement: My nickname is Goethe!
>
> I'd think the Herald would want to avoid setting a precedent of
> explicitly labe
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 15:53 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This following is a win announcement: My nickname is Goethe!
>
> I'd think the Herald would want to avoid setting a precedent of
> explicitly labeling random anno
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This following is a win announcement: My nickname is Goethe!
I'd think the Herald would want to avoid setting a precedent of
explicitly labeling random announcements as win announcements. Stuff
like "The following is a win
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> This following is a win announcement: My nickname is Goethe!
>>
>> -Goethe
>>
> Huh? I thought you were the champion of the anti-ISIDTID crowd?
What? I did actually make a
2008/6/30 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Huh? I thought you were the champion of the anti-ISIDTID crowd?
>
> BobTHJ
>
It IS a win announcement, though. Maybe e's doing a scam involving one.
ehird
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> This following is a win announcement: My nickname is Goethe!
>
> -Goethe
>
Huh? I thought you were the champion of the anti-ISIDTID crowd?
BobTHJ
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 12:40 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> This following is a win announcement: My nickname is Goethe!
Ah, a correct announcement clearly labeled as a win announcement.
Unfortunately, I don't think it meets any of the Winning Conditions, so
despite it being a win announcement it do
2008/6/17 Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The following sentence is a win announcement, as defined in Rule
> 2186, and this sentence serves to explicitly label it as one.
>
> The Call for Judgement with ID number 1980 is a tortoise, and has
> continuously been a tortoise for no greater than
On Dec 21, 2007 12:45 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By now, the purported resolution of the Agoran decision to install
> pikhq as Scorekeepor has self-ratified.
>
>
Ah, you are correct. My mistake.
BobTHJ
BobTHJ wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 11:28 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Irrelevant; the resolution need only include the valid votes on it. Inclusion
of votes which were believed to be valid but aren't actually valid does not
violate the requirements set by rule 208 (nor does any in
On Dec 20, 2007 10:20 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 20 December 2007 22:18:37 Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> > > I create 100 points in my posession, as allowed by rule 2166/1.
> > > I win the game.
> >
> > Assuming you're
pikhq wrote:
On Thursday 20 December 2007 22:37:29 Ian Kelly wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 9:53 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I create 100 points in my posession, as allowed by rule 2166/1.
I win the game.
Marks also have this loophole. Possibly VCs as well; changes to VCs
are sec
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> I create 100 points in my posession, as allowed by rule 2166/1.
> I win the game.
Assuming you're the scorekeepor, I'll buy this one. Well found!
-Goethe
On Thursday 20 December 2007 22:37:29 Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007 9:53 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I create 100 points in my posession, as allowed by rule 2166/1.
> > I win the game.
>
> Marks also have this loophole. Possibly VCs as well; changes to VCs
> are secur
On Dec 20, 2007 9:53 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I create 100 points in my posession, as allowed by rule 2166/1.
> I win the game.
Marks also have this loophole. Possibly VCs as well; changes to VCs
are secured by R2126, but R2166 has the same power.
-root
On Thursday 20 December 2007 22:18:37 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> > I create 100 points in my posession, as allowed by rule 2166/1.
> > I win the game.
>
> Assuming you're the scorekeepor, I'll buy this one. Well found!
>
> -Goethe
>
>
>
>
I am ind
Levi wrote:
By Rule 2136:
A player with 100 or more points may win the game by announcing
this fact. Upon such an announcement, each player's score is
set to zero.
I announce that I now have 100 points. Therefore I win the game.
Actually, you have 101 points.
comex wrote:
On Sunday 13 May 2007 7:09 pm, Ed Murphy wrote:
Second-System Effect registers.
I call for judgement on the following statement:
Second-System Effect registered on or about Sun, 13 May 2007 16:09:28 -0700
Arguments:
Without knowledge of the agreement that defines SSE, this act
53 matches
Mail list logo
