On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > Proposal: Okay, that worked once a long time ago > (AI = 1.7) > > Amend Rule 2343 (Victory Conditions) by inserting this paragraph after > the second paragraph: > > The remainder of this rule notwithstanding, if an event's Victory > Deadline has passed, then a person CANNOT Win the Game due to > that event, and its Victory Deadline CANNOT be extended. An > event's Victory Deadline is initially 28 days after the event, > and CANNOT be extended except as specified by this rule. If it > is within 28 days of passing, then anyone CAN extend it by 28 > days by announcement. (Initiating, assigning a judge to, or > judging a judicial case substantially relevant to the event > implicitly counts as such an announcement.)
The last sentence, in parentheses, might not be a great idea. Without it, we have to say "I extend the deadline" whenever someone calls a case, which is easy enough; with it, every CFJ that is only marginally relevant to the event could lead to a second CFJ that is also marginally relevant to the event, which (in theory) could lead to an infinite s cascade of CFJs. —Tavros *cough* Nitram
