OscarMeyr wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 12:29 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
1621 OscarMeyr to judge
I believe I'm waiting on this to be officially reassigned to me, pending
the database's hampsters waking up and going to work.
Yes, this is waiting on CotC comex to reassign it to you per
Rule 1447 (c
On Jun 29, 2007, at 12:29 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
1621 OscarMeyr to judge
I believe I'm waiting on this to be officially reassigned to me,
pending the database's hampsters waking up and going to work.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
Goethe wrote:
root wrote:
Ack! The whole point of CFJ 1684 was to settle the matter of CFJs
1622 and 1623 while avoiding the paradoxes introduced in those earlier
CFJs.
I was wondering when someone would notice this.
So was I.
However, if HP2 did
not become Speaker, Murphy is still Speak
root wrote:
> Ack! The whole point of CFJ 1684 was to settle the matter of CFJs
> 1622 and 1623 while avoiding the paradoxes introduced in those earlier
> CFJs.
I was wondering when someone would notice this. However, if HP2 did
not become Speaker, Murphy is still Speaker. Lucky fact. The Cot
On 6/28/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I intend to have HP2 judge the appeal of CFJ 1684.
Ack! The whole point of CFJ 1684 was to settle the matter of CFJs
1622 and 1623 while avoiding the paradoxes introduced in those earlier
CFJs.
-root
5 matches
Mail list logo
