On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>> On Jun 10, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2017-06-10 at 04:04 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>>> Separately, we’ve still not reverted the requirement that a payment
>>> to pend a proposal happen Without 3 Objections that
> On Jun 10, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2017-06-10 at 04:04 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> Separately, we’ve still not reverted the requirement that a payment
>> to pend a proposal happen Without 3 Objections that was put in as a
>> scam stopper. This is a huge brake on pro
On Sat, 2017-06-10 at 04:04 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Separately, we’ve still not reverted the requirement that a payment
> to pend a proposal happen Without 3 Objections that was put in as a
> scam stopper. This is a huge brake on proposals, and therefore on
> legislative play, and if we’re su
I’m way late to this party, and I’m aware I’m running the risk of reigniting a
bit of a fight by bringing it up, but, I _heartily_ endorse grok’s lament:
> On May 29, 2017, at 12:58 PM, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
>
> I was really excited to play legislative-based, classic nomic style Agora.
> T
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 6:49 PM Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2017, CuddleBeam wrote:
>
> >> Gah. Oh well. How would you put it?
> > I'm digging a hole for myself, nvm, sorry
>
> So was I. Sorry.
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
As was I in all probability. I'm sorry too. I'd suggest that we al
On Tue, 30 May 2017, CuddleBeam wrote:
Gah. Oh well. How would you put it?
I'm digging a hole for myself, nvm, sorry
So was I. Sorry.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
>Gah. Oh well. How would you put it?
I'm digging a hole for myself, nvm, sorry
>Just in case you're not aware, that message _still_ makes you sound like a huge
dick.
Gah. Oh well. How would you put it?
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2017, CuddleBeam wrote:
>
>> man saying that so stale makes me sound like a huge dick.
>>
>> ok so BASICALLY:
>>
>> -Dude it sucks that you have to leave
>> -I'm not sorry about doing what I'm doing though
>> -I want us both t
On Tue, 30 May 2017, CuddleBeam wrote:
man saying that so stale makes me sound like a huge dick.
ok so BASICALLY:
-Dude it sucks that you have to leave
-I'm not sorry about doing what I'm doing though
-I want us both to play *together* in our *own way* and be HAPPY. Hopefully
in the future tha
man saying that so stale makes me sound like a huge dick.
ok so BASICALLY:
-Dude it sucks that you have to leave
-I'm not sorry about doing what I'm doing though
-I want us both to play *together* in our *own way* and be HAPPY. Hopefully
in the future that happens.
OK THATS ALL I FEEL AWKWARD lo
I find it massively unfortunate that you've felt the need to leave, and I
do feel that I'm definitely part of this new music that is sounding across
Agora which you dislike.
But I enjoy what I enjoy, and I'll pursue my own happiness in Agora, but
I'll also try to help everyone else achieve theirs
On Mon, 29 May 2017, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
> Believe me, you were never part of the problem. I didn't mind opining
> over philosophy in Agora as long as it's backed with an understanding
> of the rules and CFJ precedent--something you always made sure to include
> in your more abstract posts
I don't think this situation required permanent record.
On May 29, 2017 3:53 PM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I would have recommended that you submitted a Writ of FAGE.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@
I would have recommended that you submitted a Writ of FAGE.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On May 29, 2017, at 12:58 PM, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
>
> I was really excited to play legislative-based, classic nomic style Agora.
> That's not what I'm g
Sad to see you go grok - hope I wasn't overly problematic - your insight so
far has led me to some interesting archive spelunking on my part - and I
really have enjoyed your play so far.
Interestingly - does grok's agency get dissolved? I think it doesn't - so
i'll work on fixing that.
(Though TB
Believe me, you were never part of the problem. I didn't mind opining over
philosophy in Agora as long as it's backed with an understanding of the
rules and CFJ precedent--something you always made sure to include in your
more abstract posts. I'm more frustrated with the blase "I say I did so I
did
Sorry if I was over-historicating myself.
On one hand, long digressions on philosophy have always been a part
of Agora, that's not going away. The recent talk about academics,
essays and theses, and new players asking lots of questions, kicked it
up a notch so maybe I started doing that too muc
18 matches
Mail list logo
