On Mon, 29 May 2017, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > Believe me, you were never part of the problem. I didn't mind opining > over philosophy in Agora as long as it's backed with an understanding > of the rules and CFJ precedent--something you always made sure to include > in your more abstract posts. I'm more frustrated with the blase "I say > I did so I did" approaches towards abstract applications of the rules, > especially in cases where the rules plainly state how that case could be > handled.
Thanks for the kind words. Definitely much appreciated. And Hmm. You can find sets of silly CFJs from one player in the archives periodically. Sometimes they're fine, but if we're trying to get activity going too, and traffic is high overall, they can be really distracting - but don't want to utterly discourage them either sometimes it's fresh eyes finding true loopholes... tricky...
