On Sat, 2017-06-10 at 04:04 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > Separately, we’ve still not reverted the requirement that a payment > to pend a proposal happen Without 3 Objections that was put in as a > scam stopper. This is a huge brake on proposals, and therefore on > legislative play, and if we’re sure we fixed the scam, then it’s > probably time for that measure to go. I’ll even write the proposal to > remove it, if that’s what it takes.
We have, by proposal. (The proposal didn't mention the old text by name, which is why you may have missed it.) I'm not sure if the Rulekeepor has processed the proposal in question yet, but the rule not having been reported doesn't prevent it having changed. -- ais523
