On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> *Ivan Hope 577 Chits
>> *woggle451 Chits
>> *Quazie675 Chits
>
> I cause Ivan Hope, woggle, and Quazie to cease to
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 15:08 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> TOTAL 7578 Chits
> >
> > The total value of the bank's assets is 9151 chits, so
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> TOTAL 7578 Chits
>
> The total value of the bank's assets is 9151 chits, so the bank is
> currently showing a profit of 1573 chits. What do
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TOTAL 7578 Chits
The total value of the bank's assets is 9151 chits, so the bank is
currently showing a profit of 1573 chits. What do we want to do with
that profit?
-root
On Thursday 24 July 2008 09:25:08 pm ihope wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote: I try one more time, and then give up if i fail
> >
> >> Without 3 objections I intend to chagne th
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:25 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I try one more time, and then give up if i fail
>>>
>>> Without 3 objections I intend
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I try one more time, and then give up if i fail
>>
>> Without 3 objections I intend to chagne the RBOA contract as follows:
>
> Is "to chagne" a term of ar
2008/7/24 Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is "to chagne" a term of art I'm not aware of?
>
He copypasted the previous attempt.
Besides, you know that we have a rule to protect that kind of stuff.
tusho
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I try one more time, and then give up if i fail
>
> Without 3 objections I intend to chagne the RBOA contract as follows:
Is "to chagne" a term of art I'm not aware of?
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Without 3 objections I intend to chagne the RBOA contract as follows:
I object.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
>> Assuming I'm a Banker Without 3 proto-objections I proto-change the
>> RBOA contract as follows:
>> ---
>> Add the following to the end for the
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Assuming I'm a Banker Without 3 proto-objections I proto-change the
> RBOA contract as follows:
> ---
> Add the following to the end for the RBOA conract:
>
> 9. Whenever a Player transfers a Mill to the Bank of Agora, and
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2008, at 3:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>
>> EXCHANGE RATES
>> ---
>> 570 crops
>> 1051 crops
>> 962 crops
>> (none) 3 crops
>> 484 crops
>> 775 crops
>> 616 crops
>>
On Jun 25, 2008, at 3:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
EXCHANGE RATES
---
570 crops
1051 crops
962 crops
(none) 3 crops
484 crops
775 crops
616 crops
687 crops
938 crops
1149 crops
42Water Rights Vouchers
48Vote Points
Would it be u
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:36 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gratuitous argument:
> >
> > While the basis of the RBOA and Protection Racket may have been the
> > same at the time of RBOA's registration such is no l
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gratuitous argument:
>
> While the basis of the RBOA and Protection Racket may have been the
> same at the time of RBOA's registration such is no longer the case.
> Less than 12 hours after the registration of the RBOA comex
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a side note, I would remind players who are critical of the
> Protection Racket agreement that by harshly dealing with the RBOA in
> this case as a result of the overlapping membership you would be
> corrupting the very ju
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a side note, I would remind players who are critical of the
> Protection Racket agreement that by harshly dealing with the RBOA in
> this case as a result of the overlapping membership you would be
> corrupting the very ju
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I OBJECT to the deregistration of the Protection Racket.
> I SUPPORT the deregistration of the Reformed Bank of Agora.
I object to both.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I intend without three objections to cause the Reformed Bank of Agora
>>> t
On 6/18/08, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is customary to allow a scamster to retain the fruit of eir scam.
> In my opinion comex should be allowed to keep the crops that he robbed
> from the bank.
How about this? If I get 27 more Vote Points, I'll give back all the
crops that I rob
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> It is customary to allow a scamster to retain the fruit of eir scam.
> In my opinion comex should be allowed to keep the crops that he robbed
> from the bank.
Custom is for either a permanent memento (e.g. patent title) or a
minor competitive advantage (a
22 matches
Mail list logo
