On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:25 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I try one more time, and then give up if i fail >>> >>> Without 3 objections I intend to chagne the RBOA contract as follows: >> >> Is "to chagne" a term of art I'm not aware of? > > Though "to change" is one possible interpretation, it's also an > abbreviation of "champagne", so this is ambiguous and therefore > ineffective. > > --Ivan Hope CXXVII >
i object to your intent to ambigufy my statements.
